I love how this is playing out. Dick shows how hurt he is and how he
can't handle any negativity towards him. Kinda reminding you of the
days you were locked up with all those neurotic geeks at IBM, hey big
guy?? God, this is sweet.....
>
> I, for one, would not want to be the administrator and deal with
these
> problems. However, I feel that the majority of members feel that
he
has handled
> them well. Perhaps he should ask the members to vote for
whether
they agree
> that he has handled a difficult situation well or has handled it
poorly. If
> he wins the vote then all the members who are criticizing him
can
shut up. If
> he does not, perhaps you would like his job.
Typical cop out. Whether anyone else wants the job or not is
irrelevant. I don't want to be president of the US but that will
never
stop me from expressing my opinion. That is called being a good
citizen. Attempting to stifle this kind of debate here is along the
same lines. So, let's hear your opinion on secrecy. Would you
prefer
our gov't used secrecy in the treatment of it's citizens?
Also, just like in politics most members would rather not get
involved.
···
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, geo928sk@ wrote:
That isn't a good basis for a group to vote on anything.
Dick