···
--- On Tue, 12/16/08, tenore_s <tenore_s@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: tenore_s <tenore_s@yahoo.com>
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Barona CA Update from Bob Dancer
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, December 16, 2008, 12:06 AM
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups. com, "vpFae" <vpFae@...> wrote:
The Barona machines have not been lowered in past two months. A
post on vpFREE to the contrary was in error, likely because a
significant amount of the good games are one circular bank of 8
machines (within 20 feet of the coat check booth) and the poster
missed that bank.
I'm the poster who noted the downgrade on the $1+ machines.
I played the machines by the coat check booth that he mentions here,
in the 25c denomination. I dispute that there was any error, because
those are not the machines I was talking about. The $1 and up machines
that had been lowered are elsewhere, as I noted in my earlier posting
(#94267). These machines had previously been NSUD (25/16/10/4/ 4), but
by the Thanksgiving weekend had been lowered to pay either
25/16/9/4/4/ (99.23%) or 25/15/9/4/4/ (98.91%, the ones with the Barona
logo). This is not simply my "recollection" of the payouts, I took
careful notes when I noticed the change.
It has recently been reported that these machines are NSUD again, and
I am glad to hear that.
Within the past week, Barona has loosened it's $1-$2-$5
inventory.
Which according to a recent post (#94697) makes them NSUD again.
Barona's response here seems to be "We didn't lower any payments, and
we promise not to do it again."
I am very glad to hear that Bob Dancer is helping us in trying to get
(and keep)good VP in in the San Diego area. If Barona offers
high-payout VP, I will play there often.
Robert
In addition to the NSU reported here (which was
already present), there is also JW2 and 10/7/239 DB for all
three denoms.
As part of the "Loosest Video Poker in San Diego
Area Certification" agreement between me and Barona, they have
agreed not to lower pay schedules on any video poker machines
without notifying me. If they do feel the need to do this, I will
return to the San Diego area (for a fee) and re-scout all the
casinos to verify that Barona still deserves the certification.
Barona has been told that if they no longer deserve the
designation within the 12-month agreement, I'll write an article
to that effect. Common sense tells us that they would not want
such an article.
Over the next year, if anyone believes that Barona has tightened
their machines, they will very likely be mistaken. The good
machines are there and they will remain until at least 12/01/2009
when the certification agreement runs out. (I hope to renew it at
that time, if warranted. We'll see.)
Bob Dancer
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]