Very possible. but we enjoy gambling for the
excitement and not for the boredom of playing one
million plus hands to prove its accuracy. Not many of
us have the energy to spend 2o hours in a casino to
prove a theoretical point. Unfortunately we are human
and have other interests or responsibilities.
vet
···
--- npf15251 <npf15251@yahoo.com> wrote:
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, vet <vet611@...>
wrote:
>
> I believe you have proved a valid point that the
> secondary programs are determining the payout.It may be a valid point, but how on Earth can you
say it is proven?I don't question your assumption. But I am saying
that proof is
considered either having absolute verifiable facts
or at the very
least a substantial amount of evidence.Guess what? The casinos won't give it to you.
There are really only two scenarios - the games are
fair, or they are
rigged. If they are fair, an occasional perfect
player will still
have a horrible run of luck resulting in the poor
outcome cited.If the games aren't fair, then the casinos can
manipulate them at
will. Kick in the secondary program on Monday this
week, then give it
a rest. Add the chip next Tuesday and Friday, then
put the game back
to normal. And so forth.If that is the case, we are all wasting an
incredible amount of time.And, more to the point ... money.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Luggage? GPS? Comic books?
Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=graduation+gifts&cs=bz