It would not be too difficult to prove that the lower hands (below 4
deuces) are showing up with the right frequency. The cycle time is
short enough that if we could get several regular players to keep
good records over 100,000 hands we would have enough data to be 95%
confident that the machines are random or not. Depending on the
number of players one could obtain higher confidence levels or go
with fewer hands per player. I proposed this experiment once before,
but I presume the local LV players are pretty convinced the FPDW are
random and fair so there was no interest in conducting such a test.
Chris
>
> I believe you have proved a valid point that the
> secondary programs are determining the payout.It may be a valid point, but how on Earth can you say it is proven?
I don't question your assumption. But I am saying that proof is
considered either having absolute verifiable facts or at the very
least a substantial amount of evidence.Guess what? The casinos won't give it to you.
There are really only two scenarios - the games are fair, or they
are
rigged. If they are fair, an occasional perfect player will still
have a horrible run of luck resulting in the poor outcome cited.If the games aren't fair, then the casinos can manipulate them at
will. Kick in the secondary program on Monday this week, then give
it
a rest. Add the chip next Tuesday and Friday, then put the game
back
to normal. And so forth.
If that is the case, we are all wasting an incredible amount of
time.
ยทยทยท
-- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "npf15251" <npf15251@...> wrote:
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, vet <vet611@> wrote:
And, more to the point ... money.