vpFREE2 Forums

are the Santa Fe Station 100%+ slant tops on the level?

I don't know how anyone would address his concern. No one can prove that the machines aren't gaffed and his report of believing that some players, collectively, went a few cycles without hitting a royal doesn't prove they are. His claim of being able to play 3000 hands an hour, casually, on one single line machine destroys the credibility of his whole story.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

···

Barf Bag <barf_bag_007@yahoo.com> wrote:

He's rightfully grouchy because instead of other people just addressing his concern, they have to start throwing in the digs.

This

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Tom Robertson <007@...> wrote:

I don't know how anyone would address his concern. No one can prove that the machines aren't gaffed and his report of believing that some players, collectively, went a few cycles without hitting a royal doesn't prove they are. His claim of being able to play 3000 hands an hour, casually, on one single line machine destroys the credibility of his whole story.

sorry for your streak, but it is nice to read a post in which the player didnt have a "winning trip". It seems every trip report tells od royals hit before breakfast, after lunch, at the bar and then on the way to the front desk checking oyt.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "vp_nbi" <nbi@...> wrote:

Banged away on these things for 5 days (approximately 80k hands) without a royal. Didn't see anyone else hit one neither. On the 5th day a local player comments "I bet you had much better success on the uprights they got rid of". I paused for a second to recollect and indeed this was the case. So it seems that not only I have observed Royal dry spells with these slant tops. Given the popularity of Joker Poker I also expected these machines to be fully occupied. What's going on here, is it common local knowledge that these things are gaffed?

Well said.
Distant memories of a VP statistic that only 1 out of 7 sessions have positive results. The frequency of positive sessions is now even less as average E.V. of machine's has gone down :frowning:

It's nice to have a long winning streak but remember results tend toward the mean "in the long run." :slight_smile:

···

sorry for your streak, but it is nice to read a post in which the player didnt have a "winning trip". It seems every trip report tells od royals hit before breakfast, after lunch, at the bar and then on the way to the front desk checking oyt.

This is the same story we see periodically. Someone posts that a machine or machines are set to pay off less than the paytable would indicate. They provide some minimal, anecodotal statements to try and support their argument and get mad when anyone challenges their statement.

Here's what vp_nbi has stated so far:

1) When playing casually I crank out about 3k hands per hour. When
focused even more. And over most of the time in question there was
at least one other player matching or exceeding my speed.

3000 hands an hour on a single line machine? If the machine is at its fastest setting and you just hit deal/draw deal/draw for an hour, I don't think you could get 3000 hands in. And he says this is casual play, he could play faster and at least one other player plays as fast. I don't believe that. Maybe on a 5 play machine.

2) He went 2 cycles without a royal. That happens all the time. Take a look at progressives. With a .25% meter, if the royal is at $1250, you have gone 80,000 hands without a royal. $1250 progressives happen a lot.

3) Nobody else is hitting royals either. How do you know that? All you are doing is taking what people say.

The only way to tell is the machines are playing fairly is to play a lot of hands, record the results carefully and analyze the data.

If 3 people playing accurately record their results and each goes 200,000 hands without a royal, you may have found unfair machines.
One person who claims to have played 80,000 hands with no royal (and also claims to play ove 3000 hands per hour) is not an indication of anything except bad data collection.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Tom Robertson <007@...> wrote:

Barf Bag <barf_bag_007@...> wrote:

> He's rightfully grouchy because instead of other people just addressing his concern, they have to start throwing in the digs.

I don't know how anyone would address his concern. No one can prove that the machines aren't gaffed and his report of believing that some players, collectively, went a few cycles without hitting a royal doesn't prove they are. His claim of being able to play 3000 hands an hour, casually, on one single line machine destroys the credibility of his whole story.

What's a 2 cycle royal draught? It's nothing. Try 6. That's my record. But the opposite of it is 3 royals in less than four hours of play. It must have been a reverse gaff.

How about a quad draught? My record is 10 cycles. What's yours? Have you ever hit back to back quads? I have many times. What would you call that, a reverse gaff?

I deal with all kinds of frequencies, not just royal frequencies. There is one little game I play where the frequency is 344 to take off a mini meter. My record is 7.5 cycles to hit the damn thing. But the opposite is I've taken it off 4 times on the first game. I just love it when those reverse gaffs happen.

Another little game I play I have to get into the bonus round to take a mini meter off. My chances are 1 in 7 in the bonus round. About 1500 plays in five years and my record is 48 straight misses. Of course, the opposite is I've also hit it 3 times in a row. Don't you just love those reverse gaffs?

Now for 3000 hph. Not even close to possible on the single line machines you play at Santa Fe. But if I had some Amarillo Slim or Titanic Thompson in me I could easily win a bet that I can do it. I'd probably get it done in about 40 minutes which means I would probably be standing there laughing at you while you watch me do it.

There is a machine out there made by Summit Gaming called a MegaPlex. It's a multi-game machine with poker, keno and line games. There are no hold buttons for video poker. All you have is a deal/draw button and the game is autohold. On super turbo speed it's like a flash. You just keep tapping that deal/draw button and you can do about 100 hands per minute. However, the autohold is only about 90% accurate. It steers you away from royals, joker royals, and straight flushes. But if I could get up a decent enough bet....

Now for the worst royal draught horror story I've ever heard-told to me by Doug Reul. When quarter Draw Till U Win (103.2%) showed up at O'Sheas he went 19 cycles and $12,000 stuck before he hit his first royal. The other players were hitting royals right along and his worst nightmare was they were gonna pull the game before he got back in the black. It took him a whole week to get back in the black (royal frequency is 9700). So it looks like they gaffed him and then they reverse gaffed him.

Note to vpFree Administrator: You need to add "RG" to the vpFree Acronyms Section. REVERSE GAFF!

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Mickey" <mickeycrimm@...> wrote:

What's a 2 cycle royal draught? It's nothing. Try 6. That's my record. But the opposite of it is 3 royals in less than four hours of play. It must have been a reverse gaff.

How about a quad draught? My record is 10 cycles. What's yours? Have you ever hit back to back quads? I have many times. What would you call that, a reverse gaff?

I deal with all kinds of frequencies, not just royal frequencies. There is one little game I play where the frequency is 344 to take off a mini meter. My record is 7.5 cycles to hit the damn thing. But the opposite is I've taken it off 4 times on the first game. I just love it when those reverse gaffs happen.

Another little game I play I have to get into the bonus round to take a mini meter off. My chances are 1 in 7 in the bonus round. About 1500 plays in five years and my record is 48 straight misses. Of course, the opposite is I've also hit it 3 times in a row. Don't you just love those reverse gaffs?

Now for 3000 hph. Not even close to possible on the single line machines you play at Santa Fe. But if I had some Amarillo Slim or Titanic Thompson in me I could easily win a bet that I can do it. I'd probably get it done in about 40 minutes which means I would probably be standing there laughing at you while you watch me do it.

There is a machine out there made by Summit Gaming called a MegaPlex. It's a multi-game machine with poker, keno and line games. There are no hold buttons for video poker. All you have is a deal/draw button and the game is autohold. On super turbo speed it's like a flash. You just keep tapping that deal/draw button and you can do about 100 hands per minute. However, the autohold is only about 90% accurate. It steers you away from royals, joker royals, and straight flushes. But if I could get up a decent enough bet....

Now for the worst royal draught horror story I've ever heard-told to me by Doug Reul. When quarter Draw Till U Win (103.2%) showed up at O'Sheas he went 19 cycles and $12,000 stuck before he hit his first royal. The other players were hitting royals right along and his worst nightmare was they were gonna pull the game before he got back in the black. It took him a whole week to get back in the black (royal frequency is 9700). So it looks like they gaffed him and then they reverse gaffed him.

Hey, Bob. The reverse gaff has been a well kept secret until now. Over the years we've all read many posts where a player is getting beat, therefore, the game must be gaffed in favor of the house. But to date we have not had the pleasure of reading a post where a player hit back to back to back quads, therefore, the game must be gaffed in favor of the player.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Bob Bartop" <bobbartop@...> wrote:

>
Note to vpFree Administrator: You need to add "RG" to the vpFree Acronyms Section. REVERSE GAFF!

I don't know how anyone would address his concern. No one can prove that the machines aren't gaffed and his report of believing that some players, collectively, went a few cycles without hitting a royal doesn't prove they are. His claim of being able to play 3000 hands an hour, casually, on one single line machine destroys the credibility of his whole story.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Yes, I stand corrected. I should have typed " give their opinion of his concern without tossing in uneccessary digs".

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

···

--- On Fri, 9/21/12, Tom Robertson <007@embarqmail.com> wrote:

From: Tom Robertson <007@embarqmail.com>
Subject: Re: [vpFREE] Re: are the Santa Fe Station 100%+ slant tops on the level?
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, September 21, 2012, 1:07 AM

      Barf Bag <barf_bag_007@yahoo.com> wrote:

He's rightfully grouchy because instead of other people just addressing his concern, they have to start throwing in the digs.