If nobody is playing the machine, there's no reason for the casino to keep it.
5% of $0 is $0.
···
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "nudge51" <nudge51@...> wrote:
Discovered yesterday that the final two banks of JW2 were all changed to the fabulous 17-7-4700 version of KBJW (98.44% return). Sometime in mid March, after arduous hours of practice, analysis, notes, and tweaking of my strategy on this game, I became comfortable enough with my speed and confidence to play only this game exclusively while at the Suncoast. On any given day that I was there, very few players were ever on this game. Even though the return on JW2 is about as close to break even as you can get, with what I know about the degree of difficulty of this game, I would have to think that any casino that has it must be maintaining a hold of 5% or better. Seems strange to me that just to prevent a very small handful of players from coming close to breaking even, they are completely eliminating what looks like a profitable game for the casino. Of course, maybe it just wasnât getting enough play. Since the game was only on multi-game, multi-denomination machines, why not just leave it alone? Am I underestimating the number of top skilled players on this game?
Nudge[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]