I assure you, I hardly take this thread of the discussion very
seriously.
Your post here and plus your next one, would seem to imply this is
all just part of a 'plan' to be in a position 180 degrees opposite
from the rest of the pack. You would appear to be striving for the
concept of any publicity is good publicity. Good luck with that.
Your second post would also appear to imply that you are not just
a 'fan' of RS, but perhaps actually in business with him? If so,
appreciate the disclosure. Good luck with it. Personally, I think
you'll do better if you focus on the positive instead of the
negative of others, but it's a 'FREE' world, isn't it?
Kil
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Rasti$ P. Rulz" <vpvegas@c...>
wrote:
Whatever. Dude you taking this way too serious. Those rulz apply
to VpFREE and some such. This is freeforallVPfreeforall. This group
was dead until Rastis come over and gave it CPR. I wouldn't wager
too much on Rastis changing his evil ways if I was you. I
Rasti$
animosity free and happy
as can be
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CoolerPoker2
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CoolerPoker
From: kilroydq2
To: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 1:55 PM
Subject: [FREEvpFREE] Re: Animosity
With all due respect, I believe you need to check the definition
of 'animosity' again.
It doesn't mean you are trying to stop anyone from selling
anything. It does mean that your focus is on being negative
against
that person as opposed to be positive about the alternative.
You
seem to be a fan of RS, so talk about his positive attributes
(of
his methodology), rather than the negative attributes of
another.
It's one thing to occassionally get into a 'compare and
contrast'
argument, but it seems counterproductive and
someone 'suspicious'
when you spend so much time hammering away at the 'competition'.
Caveat Emptor (let the buyer beware) applies to any and all when
they buy anything. There will be those that feel that when
buying
Scott, Dancer, Frome, Singer, etc... that they bought useless
stuff. I see no need for any of the authors to spend time
bashing
another author or even so much as referring to another in a
negative
way (whether directly or indirectly referring to that one).
Stick
to the positive aspects of their own methodology without
dragging
down anothers.
This isn't baseball. You don't have to prove how much you like
the
Mets by bashing the Yankees. (feel free to substitute your most
favorite and least favorite teams).
JMO
Kil
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Rasti$ P. Rulz"
<vpvegas@c...>
wrote:
> Rastis is not trying to stop anyone from doing anything. On
the
other hand someone a major publisher has referred to as "a
creature
called the queen of comps, whatever that is" , is trying to
stifle
freedom of expression and have all Rob Singer material banned
from
bookstores and have RS banned from writing for gaming
publications.
Believe me, Rastis holds no animosity towards any of the
subjects
involved. Rastis and the queen have something in common. We
are
both, "laughing all the way to the bank" as she told the
publisher. Except ole Rastis is not making his money selling
stale "readily available for free" information to naive blue
hairs
on fixed incomes. But if that's the only way the Queen can
support
her gambling habit, Rastis can live with it like she does. After
all, his money ain't going in that direction. Let the buyer
beware!
> From: kilroydq2
> To: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 12:20 PM
> Subject: [FREEvpFREE] Animosity
>
>
> I fail to understand all the animosity going on around here.
>
> Rastis seems to be upset that Jean, Bob et al sell their
information
> about how to get an advantage at Video Poker, while praising
Rob
> Singer.
>
> Doesn't Rob do the same thing? I realize the methodologies
of
how
> to go about it appear to be radically different, but in the
end
all
> these folks are simply trying to tell people how to beat (or
get
an
> edge) at Video Poker.
>
> Why is what Jean does 'wrong' and what Rob does 'okay'?
Both
write
> articles in free mediums (i.e. magazines, websites,
etc...).
Both
> have books they want to sell.
>
> In one message, Rastis said that there is a 'method to RS'
> madness'? Can someone explain this? The post it was
written it
was
> blaming Jean and others for destroying 100+% VP. This would
imply
> that RS goal is almost mis-information. Hoping to get
people to
> play less than 100+% machines by claiming it doesn't matter
that
> much and thus perhaps salvaging the 100+% machines for
others?
I'm
> not saying this is what Rob is doing, but I just found
Rastis'
> comment interesting. Can you explain what you meant by this?
>
> Surely there is room in the great expanse for more than one
> opinion. People can buy/read more than 1 person's ideas and
decide
> on their own which they choose to follow. Life would be
pretty
> boring if we could all only choose one flavor. I don't care
much
> for pistachio (sp?) ice cream but that doesn't mean I think
they
> should stop selling it.
>
> Life is too short folks....
>
> Kil
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
vpFREE Links: http://www.west-
point.org/users/usma1955/20228/VP/Links.htm
···
----- Original Message -----
> ----- Original Message -----
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
Yahoo! Groups Links
a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
FREEvpFREE-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
