--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "someone-else" <someone-else@c...>
wrote:
Rob,
I am having trouble keeping up with this. Perhaps because I was
away for 2 years? In 2001 you explained that you hired a Tiger Team
of 4, not 3mathematicians. They were able to analyze your system.
Nope, it's always been 3 and that's what i've always said.
In 2002 you sent Dean Zamzone a copy of your system for analysis.
Untrue. He never asked for a copy, and whatever effort he did put
into it was on his assumptions and without any of the special plays.
When Dean reported that the system could not work as described you
said that computer analysis could not duplicate your performance
because you do things with your mind that a computer can not
duplicate.
i.e., the Special Plays. And a computer cannot duplicate those
because a computer cannot think.
Rob, if you did not lie to Dean then how did these 4 mathematicians
analyze your system?
The mathematicians were supplied with the entire play strategy,
including goals chosen, bankroll on-hand, games to be played, and
denominations to be played. Every special play possible (over 1700 of
them) was accounted for based on situational analysis---exactly as I
offered to Michael Shackleford, Steve Jacobs, Steve Fezzik, and other
self-proclaimed geniuses of video poker and gambling. The most
meaningful answer I've received was "I don't have the time". It does
not surprise me now that Dick is chasing his tail over this, because
he makes believe he's as brilliant as this group but he and everyone
else knows he's nothing more than a glorified problem gambler....and
it runs in the family. If you know of anyone who may be qualified to
do this and they are not long-term addicts like Dick who can't see
past the vp machine's EV, please let me know.
BTW little dicky----It's getting closer to 7pm here. Where's your
answer? See what sitting aimlessley in front of video poker does to
the rest of your life??