Even at the lowest multiplier, and assuming bounceback isn't affected
by the multiplier, that puts 9/6 into 100.155%, right? (99.46 + (0.1
* 5) + 0.15) Or 100.235% with perfect strategy, I suppose. And at the
25x level, that puts you up over 102%!
Am I looking at this right, or is there something I'm missing?
On the surface, you appear to be correct. What you are missing is:
What is the REAL value of comps from your earned reward credits to you
in cash? Or alternatively, at what rate can you convert your reward
credits to actual cash? The answer to both questions is generally
going to be somewhat LESS than the stated face value of 1 cent per
point.
Here's something to consider: If you earn a bunch of reward credits,
then you use them for something like an expensive gourmet meal that you
normally would not eat, and where you wind up tipping $30, you're not
really earning any money. In this example, the comps might actually
have negative value to you in terms of your overall cash flow, although
you do get a nice meal out of the deal. On the other hand, suppose you
were all set to purchase a new high definition TV for $1500 from the
local electronics store, but instead you use your reward credits to
purchase a similar TV from the Harrah's catalog (probably at around
240,000 + reward credits!). In this second example, I think it would
be realistic to say that those 240,000 reward credits were worth about
$1500 to you.
Harrah's points can occasionally be converted into real, actual cash by
various methods - some of which probably should not be discussed on a
public board. One obvious method occurs when a local Harrah's casino
runs a promotion allowing you to convert your bank of points directly
into cash. This is normally done at a rate of 1/2 cent per point,
typically with a cap such as $1250 maximum, making the value of reward
credits = 0.05% (not counting bonus credits). If you happen to get the
25x multiplier, this becomes fairly attractive if you have decent games
available :-).
EE
···
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Will" <will@...> wrote: