From: "Harry Porter" <harry.porter@verizon.net>
From a practical vantage point, vp variance gives us a relative
measure of the degree to which the game return is dependent upon
infrequent hands with higher payoffs (e.g. RF or q-A in DB). The
higher the variance, the greater the risk that play deficient in these
hands will yield a significant loss and, conversely, the greater the
likelihood that a good run of such hands will advanced the credit
meter wildly.
Here's a particular case where I'm trying to get a handle on "variance" and
"volatility."
I'm thinking of establishing myself at El Dorado in Reno. There are several
games that I like there: the quarter multi-strike bonus poker deluxe,
50-cent or dollar Double Bonus, Loose Deuces, & Not So Ugly Deuces, and
Dollar FPJB progressive. I understand that DB has the best long-term return,
but as a visitor who gambles only for a weekend every month or two, I'm
aware of the risk that I'll never reach the long-term in my lifetime, so to
speak.
So... if I had to choose between these games, being concerned about EV, but
also wanting to put through lots of $s (for the sake of comps & invites &
such), & wanting to have a very good chance that I can play at a good speed
for say 6-8 hours without losing more than $2K, what's my "best" bet? And I
love the quarter multi-strike, & it seems like that'd have less volatility
than a dollar game, but I'm just guessing.
Off the top of my head, I'm guessing that Loose Deuces gives the biggest
risk of sharp losses over such a period, followed by Double Bonus, NSUD, &
JOB. But I'm wondering what someone who really knows would say. If I give up
EV by switching from DB to NSUD, with the idea that I'm more protected
against catastrophic losses, I dunno, maybe I've got it completely wrong?
Stuart (RandomStu)