A Clean Bet For Dicky The Dufus

[Rob_Singer1]

In case anyone, including little d, got lost in all the clouds little
dicky put up after I proposed a bet on 3 distinct issues in one of
the threads---here it is in plain English. Even a nerd couldn't spin
this one!

1. Little dicky has been saying he can beat me in the best of 7
tennis. I say he can't....and he can't. I'm in FAR better shape, I
play about twice a week, and he's a dufus. $20,000 cash.

2. Little dicky has been saying he can beat me in (GULP!) BOWLING,
best score after 10 games. I say he can't. And he can't. While most
bowlers are fat and he has the edge there--and while I haven't
touched a bowling ball in years--a weeks' of practice is all it'll
take for my superior mind and body to overcome the video poker belly.
$20,000 cash.

3. Little dicky has been saying that I do not and can't win playing a
session of mine on negative games. I KNOW he's wrong (and HE does
too, obviously if you look at how he's been ignoring this part of the
bet and tries to sweep it quietly under the imaginary rug all nerds
keep nearby). His mouth has been flapping, now it's time for the feet
to do some walking to the bank for the cash. $50,000. I win at least
$2500 playing only my strategy on only negative EV games, I get the
cash. I lose the session and he gets the cash.

3 bets. 3 winning postures. Clear as day. Will dicky the chicken or
dicky the coward step in to try to make it all go away again?? Let's
see. He has ONE chance to make up for a lifetime of inferiority
complexes and introverted cowering. Right here. Right now. Against
his nemisis who always gets the better of him. Daily. Common sense
vs. theory. Man vs. boy. Winner vs. loser. Controlled player vs.
hopeless addict.

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

In case anyone, including little d, got lost in all the clouds

little

dicky put up after I proposed a bet on 3 distinct issues in one of
the threads---here it is in plain English. Even a nerd couldn't

spin

this one!

1. Little dicky has been saying he can beat me in the best of 7
tennis. I say he can't....and he can't. I'm in FAR better shape, I
play about twice a week, and he's a dufus. $20,000 cash.

2. Little dicky has been saying he can beat me in (GULP!) BOWLING,
best score after 10 games. I say he can't. And he can't. While most
bowlers are fat and he has the edge there--and while I haven't
touched a bowling ball in years--a weeks' of practice is all it'll
take for my superior mind and body to overcome the video poker

belly.

$20,000 cash.

Rob will never face me here. I think that's pretty obvious. He will
always try and throw in something that no rational person would
accept. That is his way of backing out. He's done it before and he's
doing it now. He knows I'm a vastly superior athelete and he will
NEVER face me. You can put that in the bank.

3. Little dicky has been saying that I do not and can't win playing

a

session of mine on negative games.

Lie. I've ALWAYS said you will INCREASE session wins by playing a
progression on high variance games. 75% wins at 5 levels, 80% wins at
6 levels. Now, since everyone has seen me post this many times on
this forum, it takes little imagination to understand that Rob would
only LIE about this in order to back down from the other two bets. It
completely deflates his claims that he would win.

I KNOW he's wrong (and HE does
too, obviously if you look at how he's been ignoring this part of

the

bet and tries to sweep it quietly under the imaginary rug all nerds
keep nearby). His mouth has been flapping, now it's time for the

feet

to do some walking to the bank for the cash. $50,000. I win at

least

$2500 playing only my strategy on only negative EV games, I get the
cash. I lose the session and he gets the cash.

Rob, you are a complete coward. If I was going to bet on one of your
sessions I would bet YOU would win. I would even give 2-1 odds if
some sucker would take it. So, if you want to propose a bet, try and
make it it something reasonable so you don't look so completely
impotent. This is also why it was so obvious that you didn't have the
cash when you backed down with Fezzik. You had a 75-80% chance of
winning and, yet, you chickened out. You've been EXPOSED.

I'm still on for the tennis/bowling bets but I think everyone can
easily tell you are too chicken to face me.

[Rob_Singer1]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
>
> In case anyone, including little d, got lost in all the clouds
little
> dicky put up after I proposed a bet on 3 distinct issues in one

of

> the threads---here it is in plain English. Even a nerd couldn't
spin
> this one!
>
> 1. Little dicky has been saying he can beat me in the best of 7
> tennis. I say he can't....and he can't. I'm in FAR better shape,

I

> play about twice a week, and he's a dufus. $20,000 cash.
>
> 2. Little dicky has been saying he can beat me in (GULP!)

BOWLING,

> best score after 10 games. I say he can't. And he can't. While

most

> bowlers are fat and he has the edge there--and while I haven't
> touched a bowling ball in years--a weeks' of practice is all

it'll

> take for my superior mind and body to overcome the video poker
belly.
> $20,000 cash.
>

Rob will never face me here. I think that's pretty obvious. He will
always try and throw in something that no rational person would
accept. That is his way of backing out. He's done it before and

he's doing it now. He knows I'm a vastly superior athelete and he
will NEVER face me. You can put that in the bank.

So....um....what part of the bet makes you look non-rational today?
(I like the 'athlete' part!--do you use that when you play golf
too??!! HAHAHA!).

> 3. Little dicky has been saying that I do not and can't win

playing a session of mine on negative games.

Lie. I've ALWAYS said you will INCREASE session wins by playing a
progression on high variance games.

Here we go again....rambling and scrambling from little dicky when
his weiner is caught in the door. You say I can't win with my
strategy all the time and you can prove it. Well, so PROVE it! Here's
your big opportunity!

75% wins at 5 levels, 80% wins at 6 levels. Now, since everyone has

seen me post this many times on this forum, it takes little
imagination to understand that Rob would only LIE about this in order
to back down from the other two bets. It completely deflates his
claims that he would win.

Just like Fezzik squirmed over this, I'm seeing it again. He comes
out and blabs I can't win a session in front of anyone---just like
YOU--so I offer him the opportunity to put up or look stupid, and the
coward weasels out of it any way possible! You said I had "4:1" odds
with him. What are they here, suddenly 10:1?? Back up your weasel
words like a man! You say I can't win in front of someone then stick
with it. Enough with the yellow-streak already.

> I KNOW he's wrong (and HE does
> too, obviously if you look at how he's been ignoring this part of
the
> bet and tries to sweep it quietly under the imaginary rug all

nerds

> keep nearby). His mouth has been flapping, now it's time for the
feet
> to do some walking to the bank for the cash. $50,000. I win at
least
> $2500 playing only my strategy on only negative EV games, I get

the

> cash. I lose the session and he gets the cash.

Rob, you are a complete coward. If I was going to bet on one of

your sessions I would bet YOU would win.

HAHAHA!! Now when the shoe's on the OTHER foot, I'm a winner! What a
joke! You'd even bet on me! This sounds like big deal Hissle in the
booth and then responding to my challenge in GT. After months of
blabbing on the air and on forums that I'm a liar and no way have I
won, he then turns around after being called and humbled and
says "while not probable....it's possible!"

I would even give 2-1 odds if some sucker would take it.

So what you're saying is Fezzik, in all his glorious gambling
knowledge, was a stupid sucker in originally accepting my bet, but
then I was even dumber for offerring him a loophole to escape thru?
Interesting.

So, if you want to propose a bet, try and

make it it something reasonable so you don't look so completely
impotent. This is also why it was so obvious that you didn't have

the cash when you backed down with Fezzik. You had a 75-80% chance of
winning and, yet, you chickened out. You've been EXPOSED.

Oops again little dicky!! I "could have gotten a loan"!! You change
pants so many times with so many scenarios even the dry cleaners
can't keep up with you!

I'm still on for the tennis/bowling bets but I think everyone can
easily tell you are too chicken to face me.

I believe we all see the real you here. And there. Remember when you
claimed I was lying about my passports and work documentation, and I
called you on it by saying it was a $5000 bet that I could produce
all of it on-air in LV--so it was part of a 3-way bet similar to this
one? So what did you do? You eventually, after some embarrassing arm-
twisting, succumbed to the fact that I could produce the docs and
scrambled around trying to stick only with the tennis/bowling. Now
here you are again, aquirming your way out of the bet because you
want to sing a different tune about my witnessed session-play. So
here it is--all or nothing. Take it or leave it. Accept all 3 bets or
forever waggle away in disgrace with that tail of yours planted
firmly between your legs. Man or mouse?

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > In case anyone, including little d, got lost in all the clouds
> little
> > dicky put up after I proposed a bet on 3 distinct issues in one
of
> > the threads---here it is in plain English. Even a nerd couldn't
> spin
> > this one!
> >
> > 1. Little dicky has been saying he can beat me in the best of 7
> > tennis. I say he can't....and he can't. I'm in FAR better

shape,

I
> > play about twice a week, and he's a dufus. $20,000 cash.
> >
> > 2. Little dicky has been saying he can beat me in (GULP!)
BOWLING,
> > best score after 10 games. I say he can't. And he can't. While
most
> > bowlers are fat and he has the edge there--and while I haven't
> > touched a bowling ball in years--a weeks' of practice is all
it'll
> > take for my superior mind and body to overcome the video poker
> belly.
> > $20,000 cash.
> >
>
> Rob will never face me here. I think that's pretty obvious. He

will

> always try and throw in something that no rational person would
> accept. That is his way of backing out. He's done it before and
he's doing it now. He knows I'm a vastly superior athelete and he
will NEVER face me. You can put that in the bank.

So....um....what part of the bet makes you look non-rational today?
(I like the 'athlete' part!--do you use that when you play golf
too??!! HAHAHA!).

Like I said. You can take it to the bank.

>
> > 3. Little dicky has been saying that I do not and can't win
playing a session of mine on negative games.
>
> Lie. I've ALWAYS said you will INCREASE session wins by playing a
> progression on high variance games.

Here we go again....rambling and scrambling from little dicky when
his weiner is caught in the door. You say I can't win with my
strategy all the time and you can prove it. Well, so PROVE it!

Here's

your big opportunity!

I think Rob is really starting to lose it. After I said "you will
INCREASE session wins", he comes back with "You say I can't win with
my strategy". Does anyone else think Rob's gone completely off the
deep end?

>75% wins at 5 levels, 80% wins at 6 levels. Now, since everyone

has

seen me post this many times on this forum, it takes little
imagination to understand that Rob would only LIE about this in

order

to back down from the other two bets. It completely deflates his
claims that he would win.

Just like Fezzik squirmed over this, I'm seeing it again. He comes
out and blabs I can't win a session in front of anyone---just like
YOU--

ROTFLMAO. Robbie, I think you are related to Rosanna-Rosanna Danna.
Only you're not smart enough to say "never mind".

so I offer him the opportunity to put up or look stupid, and the
coward weasels out of it any way possible! You said I had "4:1"

odds

with him. What are they here, suddenly 10:1?? Back up your weasel
words like a man! You say I can't win in front of someone then

stick

with it. Enough with the yellow-streak already.

Well, since I NEVER said you can't win a single session, it's pretty
difficult to "stick with it". Isn't it interesting that Robbie
doesn't even understand what I've been saying all this time. Pretty
much puts everything he's said in perspective.

>
> > I KNOW he's wrong (and HE does
> > too, obviously if you look at how he's been ignoring this part

of

> the
> > bet and tries to sweep it quietly under the imaginary rug all
nerds
> > keep nearby). His mouth has been flapping, now it's time for

the

> feet
> > to do some walking to the bank for the cash. $50,000. I win at
> least
> > $2500 playing only my strategy on only negative EV games, I get
the
> > cash. I lose the session and he gets the cash.
>
> Rob, you are a complete coward. If I was going to bet on one of
your sessions I would bet YOU would win.

HAHAHA!! Now when the shoe's on the OTHER foot, I'm a winner!

Nope. You're a loser and so is your system over time on negative
machines. However, a progression is still favored in a single session
as it is with all variations of Martingale systems.

What a
joke! You'd even bet on me! This sounds like big deal Hissle in the
booth and then responding to my challenge in GT. After months of
blabbing on the air and on forums that I'm a liar and no way have I
won, he then turns around after being called and humbled and
says "while not probable....it's possible!"

Are you really this dumb? Of course it's possible that anyone can win
playing negative machines. I guess they overlooked explaining the
bell curve to you when you got that MBA.

>I would even give 2-1 odds if some sucker would take it.

So what you're saying is Fezzik, in all his glorious gambling
knowledge, was a stupid sucker in originally accepting my bet, but
then I was even dumber for offerring him a loophole to escape thru?
Interesting.

You got it. However, I think Fezzik KNEW you'd back down and so took
a chance on a losing bet just to prove that you would. You made him
look like a genius by backing out of a bet where you had a tremendous
advantage. You should have looked for a backer since it's obvious you
didn't have the money for the bet.

So, if you want to propose a bet, try and
> make it it something reasonable so you don't look so completely
> impotent. This is also why it was so obvious that you didn't have
the cash when you backed down with Fezzik. You had a 75-80% chance

of

winning and, yet, you chickened out. You've been EXPOSED.

Oops again little dicky!! I "could have gotten a loan"!! You change
pants so many times with so many scenarios even the dry cleaners
can't keep up with you!

LMAO. You SHOULD have gotten the money somehow. You'll probably never
get a chance like that again.

> I'm still on for the tennis/bowling bets but I think everyone can
> easily tell you are too chicken to face me.

I believe we all see the real you here. And there. Remember when

you

claimed I was lying about my passports and work documentation,

Lie. I NEVER said that. I simply said it would be easy to forge the
work documents. Still true.

and I
called you on it by saying it was a $5000 bet that I could produce
all of it on-air in LV--so it was part of a 3-way bet similar to

this

one?

Of course, one bet that only a fool would take in order for you to
escape the other bets. You do it all the time little man and you've
been exposed.

So what did you do? You eventually, after some embarrassing arm-
twisting, succumbed to the fact that I could produce the docs and
scrambled around trying to stick only with the tennis/bowling. Now
here you are again, aquirming your way out of the bet because you
want to sing a different tune about my witnessed session-play. So
here it is--all or nothing. Take it or leave it. Accept all 3 bets

or

forever waggle away in disgrace with that tail of yours planted
firmly between your legs. Man or mouse?

Like I said, Rob will NEVER face me, you can take that to the bank.

[Rob_Singer1]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > > In case anyone, including little d, got lost in all the

clouds

> > little
> > > dicky put up after I proposed a bet on 3 distinct issues in

one

> of
> > > the threads---here it is in plain English. Even a nerd

couldn't

> > spin
> > > this one!
> > >
> > > 1. Little dicky has been saying he can beat me in the best of

7

> > > tennis. I say he can't....and he can't. I'm in FAR better
shape,
> I
> > > play about twice a week, and he's a dufus. $20,000 cash.
> > >
> > > 2. Little dicky has been saying he can beat me in (GULP!)
> BOWLING,
> > > best score after 10 games. I say he can't. And he can't.

While

> most
> > > bowlers are fat and he has the edge there--and while I

haven't

> > > touched a bowling ball in years--a weeks' of practice is all
> it'll
> > > take for my superior mind and body to overcome the video

poker

> > belly.
> > > $20,000 cash.
> > >
> >
> > Rob will never face me here. I think that's pretty obvious. He
will
> > always try and throw in something that no rational person would
> > accept. That is his way of backing out. He's done it before and
> he's doing it now. He knows I'm a vastly superior athelete and he
> will NEVER face me. You can put that in the bank.
>
> So....um....what part of the bet makes you look non-rational

today?

> (I like the 'athlete' part!--do you use that when you play golf
> too??!! HAHAHA!).

Like I said. You can take it to the bank.

Oh, you mean (snicker snicker) your 'athleticism'?? Well, people have
seen me from head to toe on my site. I've seen you and your video
poker belly. So is your 'bank' the same one in fantasyland that you
deposit your phantom bucks into??

> >
> > > 3. Little dicky has been saying that I do not and can't win
> playing a session of mine on negative games.
> >
> > Lie. I've ALWAYS said you will INCREASE session wins by playing

a

> > progression on high variance games.
>
> Here we go again....rambling and scrambling from little dicky

when

> his weiner is caught in the door. You say I can't win with my
> strategy all the time and you can prove it. Well, so PROVE it!
Here's
> your big opportunity!

I think Rob is really starting to lose it. After I said "you will
INCREASE session wins", he comes back with "You say I can't win

with my strategy". Does anyone else think Rob's gone completely off
the deep end?

Here we have yet ANOTHER method of little dicky's weaseling. You say
I lie, you say i lose, you say I make things up. Yet now you
say "He'll probably win THIS time around!!" Like I said, your
weiner's caught in the door and no one's around to help you. You
could at least be dignified over the lies.

>
> >75% wins at 5 levels, 80% wins at 6 levels. Now, since everyone
has
> seen me post this many times on this forum, it takes little
> imagination to understand that Rob would only LIE about this in
order
> to back down from the other two bets. It completely deflates his
> claims that he would win.
>
> Just like Fezzik squirmed over this, I'm seeing it again. He

comes

> out and blabs I can't win a session in front of anyone---just

like

> YOU--

ROTFLMAO. Robbie, I think you are related to Rosanna-Rosanna Danna.
Only you're not smart enough to say "never mind".

Who? What??? You say you don't drink. Now I'm wondering.

> so I offer him the opportunity to put up or look stupid, and the
> coward weasels out of it any way possible! You said I had "4:1"
odds
> with him. What are they here, suddenly 10:1?? Back up your weasel
> words like a man! You say I can't win in front of someone then
stick
> with it. Enough with the yellow-streak already.

Well, since I NEVER said you can't win a single session, it's

pretty

difficult to "stick with it". Isn't it interesting that Robbie
doesn't even understand what I've been saying all this time. Pretty
much puts everything he's said in perspective.

Backpeddaling at it's finest! You make me look so good that I hate to
see this thread ever end! You must be regretting all your lies no end
right about now.

> >
> > > I KNOW he's wrong (and HE does
> > > too, obviously if you look at how he's been ignoring this

part

of
> > the
> > > bet and tries to sweep it quietly under the imaginary rug all
> nerds
> > > keep nearby). His mouth has been flapping, now it's time for
the
> > feet
> > > to do some walking to the bank for the cash. $50,000. I win

at

> > least
> > > $2500 playing only my strategy on only negative EV games, I

get

> the
> > > cash. I lose the session and he gets the cash.
> >
> > Rob, you are a complete coward. If I was going to bet on one of
> your sessions I would bet YOU would win.
>
> HAHAHA!! Now when the shoe's on the OTHER foot, I'm a winner!

Nope. You're a loser and so is your system over time on negative
machines. However, a progression is still favored in a single

session as it is with all variations of Martingale systems.

Right hand/left hand/....look ma, no hands! Have you any idea how
stupid you're looking here? You got caught and you know it. Now put
up and stop whining!

> What a
> joke! You'd even bet on me! This sounds like big deal Hissle in

the

> booth and then responding to my challenge in GT. After months of
> blabbing on the air and on forums that I'm a liar and no way have

I

> won, he then turns around after being called and humbled and
> says "while not probable....it's possible!"

Are you really this dumb? Of course it's possible that anyone can

win playing negative machines. I guess they overlooked explaining the

bell curve to you when you got that MBA.

This has got to be my sweetest victory over you yet....unless you
choose to accept the bet and lose even bigger! A humma...a humma....a
humma.....Whine and moan all you like. You're still a clucking
chicken trying to wiggle your way out of a tough spot. this is just
too great!!!

>
> >I would even give 2-1 odds if some sucker would take it.
>
> So what you're saying is Fezzik, in all his glorious gambling
> knowledge, was a stupid sucker in originally accepting my bet,

but then I was even dumber for offerring him a loophole to escape
thru? Interesting.

You got it. However, I think Fezzik KNEW you'd back down and so

took a chance on a losing bet just to prove that you would. You made
him look like a genius by backing out of a bet where you had a
tremendous advantage. You should have looked for a backer since it's
obvious you didn't have the money for the bet.

Not even a nice try if you read the entire article on it--which was,
BTW, verified by the managing editor as he came on under an alias to
solicit input. The big surprise was my accepting Fezzik's ridiculous
conditions--he gulped REAL hard when that happened. I however never
expected he'd back out because of a simple statement he'd have to
write down and/or say about my strategy---esp. since he, like you,
blabbed that I'd never win even one session. All he did was confirm
he does not have the cash for the 2nd time in 2 weeks. That made me
king, and I'm still in the throne.

>
> So, if you want to propose a bet, try and
> > make it it something reasonable so you don't look so completely
> > impotent. This is also why it was so obvious that you didn't

have

> the cash when you backed down with Fezzik. You had a 75-80%

chance

of
> winning and, yet, you chickened out. You've been EXPOSED.
>
> Oops again little dicky!! I "could have gotten a loan"!! You

change

> pants so many times with so many scenarios even the dry cleaners
> can't keep up with you!

LMAO. You SHOULD have gotten the money somehow. You'll probably

never get a chance like that again.

Yup, probably never again! the banker was sitting around waiting for
me to ask him for $740k!
  

> > I'm still on for the tennis/bowling bets but I think everyone

can

> > easily tell you are too chicken to face me.
>
> I believe we all see the real you here. And there. Remember when
you
> claimed I was lying about my passports and work documentation,

Lie. I NEVER said that. I simply said it would be easy to forge the
work documents. Still true.

> and I
> called you on it by saying it was a $5000 bet that I could

produce

> all of it on-air in LV--so it was part of a 3-way bet similar to
this
> one?

Of course, one bet that only a fool would take in order for you to
escape the other bets. You do it all the time little man and you've
been exposed.

> So what did you do? You eventually, after some embarrassing arm-
> twisting, succumbed to the fact that I could produce the docs and
> scrambled around trying to stick only with the tennis/bowling.

Now

> here you are again, aquirming your way out of the bet because you
> want to sing a different tune about my witnessed session-play. So
> here it is--all or nothing. Take it or leave it. Accept all 3

bets

or
> forever waggle away in disgrace with that tail of yours planted
> firmly between your legs. Man or mouse?

Like I said, Rob will NEVER face me, you can take that to the bank.

You're such a wimp. Face me or face humiliation. All 3. I have to
admit, the longer this goes on the more apt I am to just play you in
the tennis & bowling. i'm beginning to see how funny it'd look
watching your vp belly bounce around out there. May I take a picture
and post it up on my site?

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > > In case anyone, including little d, got lost in all the
clouds
> > > little
> > > > dicky put up after I proposed a bet on 3 distinct issues in
one
> > of
> > > > the threads---here it is in plain English. Even a nerd
couldn't
> > > spin
> > > > this one!
> > > >
> > > > 1. Little dicky has been saying he can beat me in the best

of

7
> > > > tennis. I say he can't....and he can't. I'm in FAR better
> shape,
> > I
> > > > play about twice a week, and he's a dufus. $20,000 cash.
> > > >
> > > > 2. Little dicky has been saying he can beat me in (GULP!)
> > BOWLING,
> > > > best score after 10 games. I say he can't. And he can't.
While
> > most
> > > > bowlers are fat and he has the edge there--and while I
haven't
> > > > touched a bowling ball in years--a weeks' of practice is

all

> > it'll
> > > > take for my superior mind and body to overcome the video
poker
> > > belly.
> > > > $20,000 cash.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Rob will never face me here. I think that's pretty obvious.

He

> will
> > > always try and throw in something that no rational person

would

> > > accept. That is his way of backing out. He's done it before

and

> > he's doing it now. He knows I'm a vastly superior athelete and

he

> > will NEVER face me. You can put that in the bank.
> >
> > So....um....what part of the bet makes you look non-rational
today?
> > (I like the 'athlete' part!--do you use that when you play golf
> > too??!! HAHAHA!).
>
> Like I said. You can take it to the bank.

Oh, you mean (snicker snicker) your 'athleticism'?? Well, people

have

seen me from head to toe on my site. I've seen you and your video
poker belly. So is your 'bank' the same one in fantasyland that you
deposit your phantom bucks into??

Bowling and tennis. All you have to do is accept the bets on those
two little games to demonstrate I was wrong. If not (and of course
Robbie will never do it), you proved I was right. How sweet it is.

>
> > >
> > > > 3. Little dicky has been saying that I do not and can't win
> > playing a session of mine on negative games.
> > >
> > > Lie. I've ALWAYS said you will INCREASE session wins by

playing

a
> > > progression on high variance games.
> >
> > Here we go again....rambling and scrambling from little dicky
when
> > his weiner is caught in the door. You say I can't win with my
> > strategy all the time and you can prove it. Well, so PROVE it!
> Here's
> > your big opportunity!
>
> I think Rob is really starting to lose it. After I said "you will
> INCREASE session wins", he comes back with "You say I can't win
with my strategy". Does anyone else think Rob's gone completely off
the deep end?

Here we have yet ANOTHER method of little dicky's weaseling. You

say

I lie, you say i lose, you say I make things up. Yet now you
say "He'll probably win THIS time around!!" Like I said, your
weiner's caught in the door and no one's around to help you. You
could at least be dignified over the lies.

Robbie keeps making a complete fool out of himself. How sweet it
is ...

>
> >
> > >75% wins at 5 levels, 80% wins at 6 levels. Now, since

everyone

> has
> > seen me post this many times on this forum, it takes little
> > imagination to understand that Rob would only LIE about this in
> order
> > to back down from the other two bets. It completely deflates

his

> > claims that he would win.
> >
> > Just like Fezzik squirmed over this, I'm seeing it again. He
comes
> > out and blabs I can't win a session in front of anyone---just
like
> > YOU--
>
> ROTFLMAO. Robbie, I think you are related to Rosanna-Rosanna

Danna.

> Only you're not smart enough to say "never mind".

Who? What??? You say you don't drink. Now I'm wondering.

SNL, little man. Are you completely out of touch with reality?

>
> > so I offer him the opportunity to put up or look stupid, and

the

> > coward weasels out of it any way possible! You said I had "4:1"
> odds
> > with him. What are they here, suddenly 10:1?? Back up your

weasel

> > words like a man! You say I can't win in front of someone then
> stick
> > with it. Enough with the yellow-streak already.
>
> Well, since I NEVER said you can't win a single session, it's
pretty
> difficult to "stick with it". Isn't it interesting that Robbie
> doesn't even understand what I've been saying all this time.

Pretty

> much puts everything he's said in perspective.

Backpeddaling at it's finest! You make me look so good that I hate

to

see this thread ever end! You must be regretting all your lies no

end

right about now.

LMAO. Robbie can only babble as I have shown him lying once again. It
doesn't get any better than this ...

>
> > >
> > > > I KNOW he's wrong (and HE does
> > > > too, obviously if you look at how he's been ignoring this
part
> of
> > > the
> > > > bet and tries to sweep it quietly under the imaginary rug

all

> > nerds
> > > > keep nearby). His mouth has been flapping, now it's time

for

> the
> > > feet
> > > > to do some walking to the bank for the cash. $50,000. I win
at
> > > least
> > > > $2500 playing only my strategy on only negative EV games, I
get
> > the
> > > > cash. I lose the session and he gets the cash.
> > >
> > > Rob, you are a complete coward. If I was going to bet on one

of

> > your sessions I would bet YOU would win.
> >
> > HAHAHA!! Now when the shoe's on the OTHER foot, I'm a winner!
>
> Nope. You're a loser and so is your system over time on negative
> machines. However, a progression is still favored in a single
session as it is with all variations of Martingale systems.

Right hand/left hand/....look ma, no hands! Have you any idea how
stupid you're looking here? You got caught and you know it. Now put
up and stop whining!

RIV. We all know exactly who is looking stupid, impotent and woefully
inept. Look in the mirror little man and see the object of your
disdain.

>
> > What a
> > joke! You'd even bet on me! This sounds like big deal Hissle in
the
> > booth and then responding to my challenge in GT. After months

of

> > blabbing on the air and on forums that I'm a liar and no way

have

I
> > won, he then turns around after being called and humbled and
> > says "while not probable....it's possible!"
>
> Are you really this dumb? Of course it's possible that anyone can
win playing negative machines. I guess they overlooked explaining

the

> bell curve to you when you got that MBA.

This has got to be my sweetest victory over you yet....unless you
choose to accept the bet and lose even bigger! A humma...a

humma....a

humma.....Whine and moan all you like. You're still a clucking
chicken trying to wiggle your way out of a tough spot. this is just
too great!!!

Even your normal monkey boy rhetoric is sounding lame. It doesn't
even sound like you could convince yourself. You really should quit
responding to this thread too. You've lost so completely.

>
> >
> > >I would even give 2-1 odds if some sucker would take it.
> >
> > So what you're saying is Fezzik, in all his glorious gambling
> > knowledge, was a stupid sucker in originally accepting my bet,
but then I was even dumber for offerring him a loophole to escape
thru? Interesting.
>
> You got it. However, I think Fezzik KNEW you'd back down and so
took a chance on a losing bet just to prove that you would. You

made

him look like a genius by backing out of a bet where you had a
tremendous advantage. You should have looked for a backer since

it's

obvious you didn't have the money for the bet.

Not even a nice try if you read the entire article on it--

I read the TRUTH, the actual exchnage, as did everyone else here. It
was all there in B&W. No one cares about your attempts to rewrite the
truth. He accepted, you ran. End of story. How sweet it is ...

which was,
BTW, verified by the managing editor as he came on under an alias

to

solicit input. The big surprise was my accepting Fezzik's

ridiculous

conditions--he gulped REAL hard when that happened. I however never
expected he'd back out because of a simple statement he'd have to
write down and/or say about my strategy---esp. since he, like you,
blabbed that I'd never win even one session. All he did was confirm
he does not have the cash for the 2nd time in 2 weeks. That made me
king, and I'm still in the throne.

Words = frustration. Sorry, moron, but YOU BACKED OUT. We all know
it. You are looking so foolish and it warms my heart to see you
sweat. If the word "loser" wasn't so commonly used we could replace
it with "Singer". You gotta love it ...

>
> >
> > So, if you want to propose a bet, try and
> > > make it it something reasonable so you don't look so

completely

> > > impotent. This is also why it was so obvious that you didn't
have
> > the cash when you backed down with Fezzik. You had a 75-80%
chance
> of
> > winning and, yet, you chickened out. You've been EXPOSED.
> >
> > Oops again little dicky!! I "could have gotten a loan"!! You
change
> > pants so many times with so many scenarios even the dry

cleaners

> > can't keep up with you!
>
> LMAO. You SHOULD have gotten the money somehow. You'll probably
never get a chance like that again.

Yup, probably never again! the banker was sitting around waiting

for

me to ask him for $740k!

Cry me a tune, little man. ROTFLMAO.

> > > I'm still on for the tennis/bowling bets but I think everyone
can
> > > easily tell you are too chicken to face me.
> >
> > I believe we all see the real you here. And there. Remember

when

> you
> > claimed I was lying about my passports and work documentation,
>
> Lie. I NEVER said that. I simply said it would be easy to forge

the

> work documents. Still true.
>
> > and I
> > called you on it by saying it was a $5000 bet that I could
produce
> > all of it on-air in LV--so it was part of a 3-way bet similar

to

> this
> > one?
>
> Of course, one bet that only a fool would take in order for you

to

> escape the other bets. You do it all the time little man and

you've

> been exposed.
>
> > So what did you do? You eventually, after some embarrassing arm-
> > twisting, succumbed to the fact that I could produce the docs

and

> > scrambled around trying to stick only with the tennis/bowling.
Now
> > here you are again, aquirming your way out of the bet because

you

> > want to sing a different tune about my witnessed session-play.

So

> > here it is--all or nothing. Take it or leave it. Accept all 3
bets
> or
> > forever waggle away in disgrace with that tail of yours planted
> > firmly between your legs. Man or mouse?
>
> Like I said, Rob will NEVER face me, you can take that to the

bank.

You're such a wimp. Face me or face humiliation. All 3.

LMAO. Did I mention a bank? Chuckle, chuckle. You are making me look
so smart. Thanks little man for once again proving I am much smarter
than you.

I have to
admit, the longer this goes on the more apt I am to just play you

in

the tennis & bowling. i'm beginning to see how funny it'd look
watching your vp belly bounce around out there. May I take a

picture

and post it up on my site?

But of course, you won't. You're scared of having to post the results
that would show me winning easily. How sweet it is ...

[Rob_Singer1]

Even I can't read all the nonsense little dicky scribbles in, then
edits out some of my posts, then changes his previous input....I
guess it makes him feel good to eliminate the humiliation I lay on
him day after day. I'll sum it all up right here:

I proposed 3 bets: tennis, bowling, and a one session verification of
my strategy win. For all 3, little dicky is on record as saying I
can't win. Of course, because he doesn't want to lose $50k that he
doesn't have, he squirms and weasels out of the session bet, now
suddenly claiming I can easily WIN such a session. OK, I accept his
being a coward and a liar and will delete that from the grouping in
order to reduce his overall misery. And a great big SIGH of dick-
relief is forthcoming as soon as he reads this.

So if the dicker won't stand up to his claims that my strategy is a
loser, the only way to put a nerd in his rightful place of licking my
shoes is exactly how I used to do it in high school with such idiots--
physically. I'll play him the best of 7 in tennis for $20k. I played
2 matches today and jogged home afterwards. I'll also bowl best of 10
for $20k. Yesterday I bowled my first time in years and got 148, 178,
& 205. (Is that good or bad?). And for another $20k unrelated to the
first 2 (so poor little dicky can't squeal and whine like a wounded
weasel that I tossed in another 'unreasonable bet') I propose we run
a 3-mile course, and whoever does it in less time wins.

So lets work out the date or dates so we can all watch little dicky's
video poker belly bounce and dance all over the place! BTW: Tennis is
with no shirts on. I want all the laughs I can get.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

Even I can't read all the nonsense little dicky scribbles in, then
edits out some of my posts, then changes his previous input....I
guess it makes him feel good to eliminate the humiliation I lay on
him day after day. I'll sum it all up right here:

Once again Robbie deletes his obvious lies and fantasies in hopes
that everyone who ALREADY read them will somehow magically forget
overnight. You gotta love it ...

I proposed 3 bets: tennis, bowling, and a one session verification

of

my strategy win. For all 3, little dicky is on record as saying I
can't win.

Still the same lie little man? You are truly the bonehead of all
boneheads. Sure, I'll beat you in tennis and bowling because I am a
far superior athelete, and we already know I stated YOU are a 4-1
favorite to win a SINGLE session using a 6 level progression.

Of course, because he doesn't want to lose $50k that he
doesn't have, he squirms and weasels out of the session bet, now
suddenly claiming I can easily WIN such a session.

I guess Rob's definition of "suddenly" includes the results from my
simulations as far back as last December? Of course, you can go back
at least to year and a half to see I've said this all along. Robbie
sure does love to make his LIEs obvious these days. Must be he has
become SOOOOOOOO frustrated he can't sleep at night (or during the
day).

OK, I accept his
being a coward and a liar and will delete that from the grouping in
order to reduce his overall misery. And a great big SIGH of dick-
relief is forthcoming as soon as he reads this.

CC. I can see Rob is getting ready to discard this obvious lie and
replace bet 3 with another one. We already know he won't take me on
in tennis and bowling. You can take that to the bank.

So if the dicker won't stand up to his claims that my strategy is a
loser, the only way to put a nerd in his rightful place of licking

my

shoes is exactly how I used to do it in high school with such

idiots--

physically. I'll play him the best of 7 in tennis for $20k. I

played

2 matches today and jogged home afterwards. I'll also bowl best of

10

for $20k. Yesterday I bowled my first time in years and got 148,

178,

& 205. (Is that good or bad?).

Not bad, but I'm sure it's just another lie, or, you used the bumpers
like most of the other 3rd graders.

And for another $20k unrelated to the
first 2 (so poor little dicky can't squeal and whine like a wounded
weasel that I tossed in another 'unreasonable bet') I propose we

run

a 3-mile course, and whoever does it in less time wins.

ROTFLMAO. I already told Robbie about my bad knee back in January. He
already knows I can't run. This is hilarious. Once again Robbie comes
up with a bet that he KNOWS I'll never take. What did I say about the
bank? Robbie proves me right again. How sweet it is ...

So lets work out the date or dates so we can all watch little

dicky's

video poker belly bounce and dance all over the place! BTW: Tennis

is

with no shirts on. I want all the laughs I can get.

Just to keep the record straight (CC-Robbie loves it when I do this).
My belly existed long before I ever played VP. I think a better
description would be a TV belly since eating while watching TV is my
real downfall. If anything, VP has helped me reduce it's size since I
never eat while playing VP. I weighed as much as 221 lbs. before I
played VP. Now, I'm around 207. And, of course, having a few extra
lbs. doesn't change the fact that I would beat Robbie in both tennis
and bowling (which we all know will never happen and you can take
that to the bank).

[Rob_Singer1]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> Even I can't read all the nonsense little dicky scribbles in,

then

> edits out some of my posts, then changes his previous input....I
> guess it makes him feel good to eliminate the humiliation I lay

on

> him day after day. I'll sum it all up right here:

Once again Robbie deletes his obvious lies and fantasies in hopes
that everyone who ALREADY read them will somehow magically forget
overnight. You gotta love it ...

Yup, and BTW, I hate to embarrass you again (actually I ENJOY it!)
but just what is it that you gotta love??

>
> I proposed 3 bets: tennis, bowling, and a one session

verification

of
> my strategy win. For all 3, little dicky is on record as saying I
> can't win.

Still the same lie little man? You are truly the bonehead of all
boneheads. Sure, I'll beat you in tennis and bowling because I am a
far superior athelete, and we already know I stated YOU are a 4-1
favorite to win a SINGLE session using a 6 level progression.

> Of course, because he doesn't want to lose $50k that he
> doesn't have, he squirms and weasels out of the session bet, now
> suddenly claiming I can easily WIN such a session.

I guess Rob's definition of "suddenly" includes the results from my
simulations as far back as last December? Of course, you can go

back

at least to year and a half to see I've said this all along. Robbie
sure does love to make his LIEs obvious these days. Must be he has
become SOOOOOOOO frustrated he can't sleep at night (or during the
day).

> OK, I accept his
> being a coward and a liar and will delete that from the grouping

in

> order to reduce his overall misery. And a great big SIGH of dick-
> relief is forthcoming as soon as he reads this.

CC. I can see Rob is getting ready to discard this obvious lie and
replace bet 3 with another one. We already know he won't take me on
in tennis and bowling. You can take that to the bank.

>
> So if the dicker won't stand up to his claims that my strategy is

a

> loser, the only way to put a nerd in his rightful place of

licking

my
> shoes is exactly how I used to do it in high school with such
idiots--
> physically. I'll play him the best of 7 in tennis for $20k. I
played
> 2 matches today and jogged home afterwards. I'll also bowl best

of

10
> for $20k. Yesterday I bowled my first time in years and got 148,
178,
> & 205. (Is that good or bad?).

Not bad, but I'm sure it's just another lie, or, you used the

bumpers

like most of the other 3rd graders.

> And for another $20k unrelated to the
> first 2 (so poor little dicky can't squeal and whine like a

wounded

> weasel that I tossed in another 'unreasonable bet') I propose we
run
> a 3-mile course, and whoever does it in less time wins.

ROTFLMAO. I already told Robbie about my bad knee back in January.

He

already knows I can't run. This is hilarious. Once again Robbie

comes

up with a bet that he KNOWS I'll never take. What did I say about

the

bank? Robbie proves me right again. How sweet it is ...

HAHA!! You can 'play tennis' but you can't jog!! So then let's up the
tennis bet to $40k--should be NO PROBLEM to a star player like you!

>
> So lets work out the date or dates so we can all watch little
dicky's
> video poker belly bounce and dance all over the place! BTW:

Tennis

is
> with no shirts on. I want all the laughs I can get.

Just to keep the record straight (CC-Robbie loves it when I do

this).

My belly existed long before I ever played VP. I think a better
description would be a TV belly since eating while watching TV is

my

real downfall. If anything, VP has helped me reduce it's size since

I

never eat while playing VP. I weighed as much as 221 lbs. before I
played VP. Now, I'm around 207. And, of course, having a few extra
lbs. doesn't change the fact that I would beat Robbie in both

tennis

and bowling (which we all know will never happen and you can take
that to the bank).

You did everything but set it up. Why am I not surprised. Blabbing
excuse after excuse about the video poker belly--let's save the
laughs for judgement day. I see you're even hoping that we won't
play. I've never lost to a fat ass and I won't now.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > Even I can't read all the nonsense little dicky scribbles in,
then
> > edits out some of my posts, then changes his previous

input....I

> > guess it makes him feel good to eliminate the humiliation I lay
on
> > him day after day. I'll sum it all up right here:
>
> Once again Robbie deletes his obvious lies and fantasies in hopes
> that everyone who ALREADY read them will somehow magically forget
> overnight. You gotta love it ...

Yup, and BTW, I hate to embarrass you again (actually I ENJOY it!)
but just what is it that you gotta love??

Your foolish posts.

>
> >
> > I proposed 3 bets: tennis, bowling, and a one session
verification
> of
> > my strategy win. For all 3, little dicky is on record as saying

I

> > can't win.
>
> Still the same lie little man? You are truly the bonehead of all
> boneheads. Sure, I'll beat you in tennis and bowling because I am

a

> far superior athelete, and we already know I stated YOU are a 4-1
> favorite to win a SINGLE session using a 6 level progression.
>
> > Of course, because he doesn't want to lose $50k that he
> > doesn't have, he squirms and weasels out of the session bet,

now

> > suddenly claiming I can easily WIN such a session.
>
> I guess Rob's definition of "suddenly" includes the results from

my

> simulations as far back as last December? Of course, you can go
back
> at least to year and a half to see I've said this all along.

Robbie

> sure does love to make his LIEs obvious these days. Must be he

has

> become SOOOOOOOO frustrated he can't sleep at night (or during

the

> day).
>
> > OK, I accept his
> > being a coward and a liar and will delete that from the

grouping

in
> > order to reduce his overall misery. And a great big SIGH of

dick-

> > relief is forthcoming as soon as he reads this.
>
> CC. I can see Rob is getting ready to discard this obvious lie

and

> replace bet 3 with another one. We already know he won't take me

on

> in tennis and bowling. You can take that to the bank.
>
> >
> > So if the dicker won't stand up to his claims that my strategy

is

a
> > loser, the only way to put a nerd in his rightful place of
licking
> my
> > shoes is exactly how I used to do it in high school with such
> idiots--
> > physically. I'll play him the best of 7 in tennis for $20k. I
> played
> > 2 matches today and jogged home afterwards. I'll also bowl best
of
> 10
> > for $20k. Yesterday I bowled my first time in years and got

148,

> 178,
> > & 205. (Is that good or bad?).
>
> Not bad, but I'm sure it's just another lie, or, you used the
bumpers
> like most of the other 3rd graders.
>
> > And for another $20k unrelated to the
> > first 2 (so poor little dicky can't squeal and whine like a
wounded
> > weasel that I tossed in another 'unreasonable bet') I propose

we

> run
> > a 3-mile course, and whoever does it in less time wins.
>
> ROTFLMAO. I already told Robbie about my bad knee back in

January.

He
> already knows I can't run. This is hilarious. Once again Robbie
comes
> up with a bet that he KNOWS I'll never take. What did I say about
the
> bank? Robbie proves me right again. How sweet it is ...

HAHA!! You can 'play tennis' but you can't jog!!

You should know there's a big difference when you had your foot
problems. In tennis it's a few side-side movements (and breaks)
without the constant stress of running.

So then let's up the
tennis bet to $40k--should be NO PROBLEM to a star player like you!

Robbie will never agree ... you can take that to the bank. CC.

>
> >
> > So lets work out the date or dates so we can all watch little
> dicky's
> > video poker belly bounce and dance all over the place! BTW:
Tennis
> is
> > with no shirts on. I want all the laughs I can get.
>
> Just to keep the record straight (CC-Robbie loves it when I do
this).
> My belly existed long before I ever played VP. I think a better
> description would be a TV belly since eating while watching TV is
my
> real downfall. If anything, VP has helped me reduce it's size

since

I
> never eat while playing VP. I weighed as much as 221 lbs. before

I

> played VP. Now, I'm around 207. And, of course, having a few

extra

> lbs. doesn't change the fact that I would beat Robbie in both
tennis
> and bowling (which we all know will never happen and you can take
> that to the bank).

You did everything but set it up. Why am I not surprised. Blabbing
excuse after excuse about the video poker belly--let's save the
laughs for judgement day. I see you're even hoping that we won't
play. I've never lost to a fat ass and I won't now.

Then why do you keep avoiding the bet? The only conclusion anyone
reading this can come to is that you're afraid of me (and my belly).
LMBO.

[Rob_Singer1]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > > Even I can't read all the nonsense little dicky scribbles in,
> then
> > > edits out some of my posts, then changes his previous
input....I
> > > guess it makes him feel good to eliminate the humiliation I

lay

> on
> > > him day after day. I'll sum it all up right here:
> >
> > Once again Robbie deletes his obvious lies and fantasies in

hopes

> > that everyone who ALREADY read them will somehow magically

forget

> > overnight. You gotta love it ...
>
> Yup, and BTW, I hate to embarrass you again (actually I ENJOY

it!)

> but just what is it that you gotta love??

Your foolish posts.

> >
> > >
> > > I proposed 3 bets: tennis, bowling, and a one session
> verification
> > of
> > > my strategy win. For all 3, little dicky is on record as

saying

I
> > > can't win.
> >
> > Still the same lie little man? You are truly the bonehead of

all

> > boneheads. Sure, I'll beat you in tennis and bowling because I

am

a
> > far superior athelete, and we already know I stated YOU are a 4-

1

> > favorite to win a SINGLE session using a 6 level progression.
> >
> > > Of course, because he doesn't want to lose $50k that he
> > > doesn't have, he squirms and weasels out of the session bet,
now
> > > suddenly claiming I can easily WIN such a session.
> >
> > I guess Rob's definition of "suddenly" includes the results

from

my
> > simulations as far back as last December? Of course, you can go
> back
> > at least to year and a half to see I've said this all along.
Robbie
> > sure does love to make his LIEs obvious these days. Must be he
has
> > become SOOOOOOOO frustrated he can't sleep at night (or during
the
> > day).
> >
> > > OK, I accept his
> > > being a coward and a liar and will delete that from the
grouping
> in
> > > order to reduce his overall misery. And a great big SIGH of
dick-
> > > relief is forthcoming as soon as he reads this.
> >
> > CC. I can see Rob is getting ready to discard this obvious lie
and
> > replace bet 3 with another one. We already know he won't take

me

on
> > in tennis and bowling. You can take that to the bank.
> >
> > >
> > > So if the dicker won't stand up to his claims that my

strategy

is
> a
> > > loser, the only way to put a nerd in his rightful place of
> licking
> > my
> > > shoes is exactly how I used to do it in high school with such
> > idiots--
> > > physically. I'll play him the best of 7 in tennis for $20k. I
> > played
> > > 2 matches today and jogged home afterwards. I'll also bowl

best

> of
> > 10
> > > for $20k. Yesterday I bowled my first time in years and got
148,
> > 178,
> > > & 205. (Is that good or bad?).
> >
> > Not bad, but I'm sure it's just another lie, or, you used the
> bumpers
> > like most of the other 3rd graders.
> >
> > > And for another $20k unrelated to the
> > > first 2 (so poor little dicky can't squeal and whine like a
> wounded
> > > weasel that I tossed in another 'unreasonable bet') I propose
we
> > run
> > > a 3-mile course, and whoever does it in less time wins.
> >
> > ROTFLMAO. I already told Robbie about my bad knee back in
January.
> He
> > already knows I can't run. This is hilarious. Once again Robbie
> comes
> > up with a bet that he KNOWS I'll never take. What did I say

about

> the
> > bank? Robbie proves me right again. How sweet it is ...
>
> HAHA!! You can 'play tennis' but you can't jog!!

You should know there's a big difference when you had your foot
problems. In tennis it's a few side-side movements (and breaks)
without the constant stress of running.

If that's all you think tennis is then you'll get swept in little
time.

> So then let's up the
> tennis bet to $40k--should be NO PROBLEM to a star player like

you!

Robbie will never agree ... you can take that to the bank. CC.

Is that a yes?

> >
> > >
> > > So lets work out the date or dates so we can all watch little
> > dicky's
> > > video poker belly bounce and dance all over the place! BTW:
> Tennis
> > is
> > > with no shirts on. I want all the laughs I can get.
> >
> > Just to keep the record straight (CC-Robbie loves it when I do
> this).
> > My belly existed long before I ever played VP. I think a better
> > description would be a TV belly since eating while watching TV

is

> my
> > real downfall. If anything, VP has helped me reduce it's size
since
> I
> > never eat while playing VP. I weighed as much as 221 lbs.

before

I
> > played VP. Now, I'm around 207. And, of course, having a few
extra
> > lbs. doesn't change the fact that I would beat Robbie in both
> tennis
> > and bowling (which we all know will never happen and you can

take

> > that to the bank).
>
> You did everything but set it up. Why am I not surprised.

Blabbing

> excuse after excuse about the video poker belly--let's save the
> laughs for judgement day. I see you're even hoping that we won't
> play. I've never lost to a fat ass and I won't now.

Then why do you keep avoiding the bet? The only conclusion anyone
reading this can come to is that you're afraid of me (and my

belly). LMBO.

What part of "so let's work out the dates" confuses you?? I can't
even see your loophole this time around.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > > physically. I'll play him the best of 7 in tennis for $20k.

I

> > > played
> > > > 2 matches today and jogged home afterwards. I'll also bowl
best
> > of
> > > 10
> > > > for $20k. Yesterday I bowled my first time in years and got
> 148,
> > > 178,
> > > > & 205. (Is that good or bad?).
> > >
> > > Not bad, but I'm sure it's just another lie, or, you used the
> > bumpers
> > > like most of the other 3rd graders.
> > >
> > > > And for another $20k unrelated to the
> > > > first 2 (so poor little dicky can't squeal and whine like a
> > wounded
> > > > weasel that I tossed in another 'unreasonable bet') I

propose

> we
> > > run
> > > > a 3-mile course, and whoever does it in less time wins.
> > >
> > > ROTFLMAO. I already told Robbie about my bad knee back in
> January.
> > He
> > > already knows I can't run. This is hilarious. Once again

Robbie

> > comes
> > > up with a bet that he KNOWS I'll never take. What did I say
about
> > the
> > > bank? Robbie proves me right again. How sweet it is ...
> >
> > HAHA!! You can 'play tennis' but you can't jog!!
>
> You should know there's a big difference when you had your foot
> problems. In tennis it's a few side-side movements (and breaks)
> without the constant stress of running.

If that's all you think tennis is then you'll get swept in little
time.

Maybe .... maybe not.

>
> > So then let's up the
> > tennis bet to $40k--should be NO PROBLEM to a star player like
you!
>
> Robbie will never agree ... you can take that to the bank. CC.

Is that a yes?

No. If you want to do the tennis and bowling for bragging rights,
just say so. I've already accepted the same bet for both. I'll
understand if you don't agree. You could hardly expect to beat a
superior athlete.

>
> > >
> > > >
> > > > So lets work out the date or dates so we can all watch

little

> > > dicky's
> > > > video poker belly bounce and dance all over the place! BTW:
> > Tennis
> > > is
> > > > with no shirts on. I want all the laughs I can get.
> > >
> > > Just to keep the record straight (CC-Robbie loves it when I

do

> > this).
> > > My belly existed long before I ever played VP. I think a

better

> > > description would be a TV belly since eating while watching

TV

is
> > my
> > > real downfall. If anything, VP has helped me reduce it's size
> since
> > I
> > > never eat while playing VP. I weighed as much as 221 lbs.
before
> I
> > > played VP. Now, I'm around 207. And, of course, having a few
> extra
> > > lbs. doesn't change the fact that I would beat Robbie in both
> > tennis
> > > and bowling (which we all know will never happen and you can
take
> > > that to the bank).
> >
> > You did everything but set it up. Why am I not surprised.
Blabbing
> > excuse after excuse about the video poker belly--let's save the
> > laughs for judgement day. I see you're even hoping that we

won't

> > play. I've never lost to a fat ass and I won't now.
>
> Then why do you keep avoiding the bet? The only conclusion anyone
> reading this can come to is that you're afraid of me (and my
belly). LMBO.

What part of "so let's work out the dates" confuses you?? I can't
even see your loophole this time around.

I'm still waiting for you to drop your "I know I'm going lose so I
need 3rd bet" condition. You know the one you will always have ...
and you can take that to the bank.

[Rob_Singer1]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > > > > physically. I'll play him the best of 7 in tennis for

$20k.

I
> > > > played
> > > > > 2 matches today and jogged home afterwards. I'll also

bowl

> best
> > > of
> > > > 10
> > > > > for $20k. Yesterday I bowled my first time in years and

got

> > 148,
> > > > 178,
> > > > > & 205. (Is that good or bad?).
> > > >
> > > > Not bad, but I'm sure it's just another lie, or, you used

the

> > > bumpers
> > > > like most of the other 3rd graders.
> > > >
> > > > > And for another $20k unrelated to the
> > > > > first 2 (so poor little dicky can't squeal and whine like

a

> > > wounded
> > > > > weasel that I tossed in another 'unreasonable bet') I
propose
> > we
> > > > run
> > > > > a 3-mile course, and whoever does it in less time wins.
> > > >
> > > > ROTFLMAO. I already told Robbie about my bad knee back in
> > January.
> > > He
> > > > already knows I can't run. This is hilarious. Once again
Robbie
> > > comes
> > > > up with a bet that he KNOWS I'll never take. What did I say
> about
> > > the
> > > > bank? Robbie proves me right again. How sweet it is ...
> > >
> > > HAHA!! You can 'play tennis' but you can't jog!!
> >
> > You should know there's a big difference when you had your foot
> > problems. In tennis it's a few side-side movements (and breaks)
> > without the constant stress of running.
>
> If that's all you think tennis is then you'll get swept in little
> time.

Maybe .... maybe not.

Then it's $40k for the best of 7 match since you're too stupid to
realize it?

> >
> > > So then let's up the
> > > tennis bet to $40k--should be NO PROBLEM to a star player

like

> you!
> >
> > Robbie will never agree ... you can take that to the bank. CC.
>
> Is that a yes?

No. If you want to do the tennis and bowling for bragging rights,
just say so. I've already accepted the same bet for both. I'll
understand if you don't agree. You could hardly expect to beat a
superior athlete.

What a whiner! I suppose you'll want me to feel bad taking your cash
when I beat you in both, so I'll just give it back. I mean, no one
will think it's fair that I collect after seeing how I'm still in
decent shape while you struggle with this and that. And besides, I
LOOK like a tennis player. Whoever saw one that looks like Pudgy the
gimp anyway??

> > > > > So lets work out the date or dates so we can all watch
little
> > > > dicky's
> > > > > video poker belly bounce and dance all over the place!

BTW:

> > > Tennis
> > > > is
> > > > > with no shirts on. I want all the laughs I can get.
> > > >
> > > > Just to keep the record straight (CC-Robbie loves it when I
do
> > > this).
> > > > My belly existed long before I ever played VP. I think a
better
> > > > description would be a TV belly since eating while watching
TV
> is
> > > my
> > > > real downfall. If anything, VP has helped me reduce it's

size

> > since
> > > I
> > > > never eat while playing VP. I weighed as much as 221 lbs.
> before
> > I
> > > > played VP. Now, I'm around 207. And, of course, having a

few

> > extra
> > > > lbs. doesn't change the fact that I would beat Robbie in

both

> > > tennis
> > > > and bowling (which we all know will never happen and you

can

> take
> > > > that to the bank).
> > >
> > > You did everything but set it up. Why am I not surprised.
> Blabbing
> > > excuse after excuse about the video poker belly--let's save

the

> > > laughs for judgement day. I see you're even hoping that we
won't
> > > play. I've never lost to a fat ass and I won't now.
> >
> > Then why do you keep avoiding the bet? The only conclusion

anyone

> > reading this can come to is that you're afraid of me (and my
> belly). LMBO.
>
> What part of "so let's work out the dates" confuses you?? I can't
> even see your loophole this time around.

I'm still waiting for you to drop your "I know I'm going lose so I
need 3rd bet" condition. You know the one you will always have ...
and you can take that to the bank.

I already said it was not related to the other two. Stop stalling for
time to locate another escape route.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > > > > physically. I'll play him the best of 7 in tennis for
$20k.
> I
> > > > > played
> > > > > > 2 matches today and jogged home afterwards. I'll also
bowl
> > best
> > > > of
> > > > > 10
> > > > > > for $20k. Yesterday I bowled my first time in years and
got
> > > 148,
> > > > > 178,
> > > > > > & 205. (Is that good or bad?).
> > > > >
> > > > > Not bad, but I'm sure it's just another lie, or, you used
the
> > > > bumpers
> > > > > like most of the other 3rd graders.
> > > > >
> > > > > > And for another $20k unrelated to the
> > > > > > first 2 (so poor little dicky can't squeal and whine

like

a
> > > > wounded
> > > > > > weasel that I tossed in another 'unreasonable bet') I
> propose
> > > we
> > > > > run
> > > > > > a 3-mile course, and whoever does it in less time wins.
> > > > >
> > > > > ROTFLMAO. I already told Robbie about my bad knee back in
> > > January.
> > > > He
> > > > > already knows I can't run. This is hilarious. Once again
> Robbie
> > > > comes
> > > > > up with a bet that he KNOWS I'll never take. What did I

say

> > about
> > > > the
> > > > > bank? Robbie proves me right again. How sweet it is ...
> > > >
> > > > HAHA!! You can 'play tennis' but you can't jog!!
> > >
> > > You should know there's a big difference when you had your

foot

> > > problems. In tennis it's a few side-side movements (and

breaks)

> > > without the constant stress of running.
> >
> > If that's all you think tennis is then you'll get swept in

little

> > time.
>
> Maybe .... maybe not.

Then it's $40k for the best of 7 match since you're too stupid to
realize it?

Nope. Both bets are equal as you originally specified.

>
> > >
> > > > So then let's up the
> > > > tennis bet to $40k--should be NO PROBLEM to a star player
like
> > you!
> > >
> > > Robbie will never agree ... you can take that to the bank. CC.
> >
> > Is that a yes?
>
> No. If you want to do the tennis and bowling for bragging rights,
> just say so. I've already accepted the same bet for both. I'll
> understand if you don't agree. You could hardly expect to beat a
> superior athlete.

What a whiner! I suppose you'll want me to feel bad taking your

cash

when I beat you in both, so I'll just give it back. I mean, no one
will think it's fair that I collect after seeing how I'm still in
decent shape while you struggle with this and that. And besides, I
LOOK like a tennis player. Whoever saw one that looks like Pudgy

the

gimp anyway??

I've seen many a poor tennis player that was in good shape. Your
point?

> > > > > > So lets work out the date or dates so we can all watch
> little
> > > > > dicky's
> > > > > > video poker belly bounce and dance all over the place!
BTW:
> > > > Tennis
> > > > > is
> > > > > > with no shirts on. I want all the laughs I can get.
> > > > >
> > > > > Just to keep the record straight (CC-Robbie loves it when

I

> do
> > > > this).
> > > > > My belly existed long before I ever played VP. I think a
> better
> > > > > description would be a TV belly since eating while

watching

> TV
> > is
> > > > my
> > > > > real downfall. If anything, VP has helped me reduce it's
size
> > > since
> > > > I
> > > > > never eat while playing VP. I weighed as much as 221 lbs.
> > before
> > > I
> > > > > played VP. Now, I'm around 207. And, of course, having a
few
> > > extra
> > > > > lbs. doesn't change the fact that I would beat Robbie in
both
> > > > tennis
> > > > > and bowling (which we all know will never happen and you
can
> > take
> > > > > that to the bank).
> > > >
> > > > You did everything but set it up. Why am I not surprised.
> > Blabbing
> > > > excuse after excuse about the video poker belly--let's save
the
> > > > laughs for judgement day. I see you're even hoping that we
> won't
> > > > play. I've never lost to a fat ass and I won't now.
> > >
> > > Then why do you keep avoiding the bet? The only conclusion
anyone
> > > reading this can come to is that you're afraid of me (and my
> > belly). LMBO.
> >
> > What part of "so let's work out the dates" confuses you?? I

can't

> > even see your loophole this time around.
>
> I'm still waiting for you to drop your "I know I'm going lose so

I

> need 3rd bet" condition. You know the one you will always

have ...

> and you can take that to the bank.

I already said it was not related to the other two. Stop stalling

for

time to locate another escape route.

Is your backhand of way of accepting YOUR ORIGINAL challenges 1) and
2) without a 3rd safety option? Your remember, from msg 4446:

1. Little dicky has been saying he can beat me in the best of 7
tennis. I say he can't....and he can't. I'm in FAR better shape, I
play about twice a week, and he's a dufus. $20,000 cash.

2. Little dicky has been saying he can beat me in (GULP!) BOWLING,
best score after 10 games. I say he can't. And he can't. While most
bowlers are fat and he has the edge there--and while I haven't
touched a bowling ball in years--a weeks' of practice is all it'll
take for my superior mind and body to overcome the video poker belly.
$20,000 cash.

Now, will Robbie simply say "yes"? Nope, he will continue to
scramble ... you can take that to the bank.

[Rob_Singer1]

> > > > > HAHA!! You can 'play tennis' but you can't jog!!
> > > >
> > > > You should know there's a big difference when you had your
foot
> > > > problems. In tennis it's a few side-side movements (and
breaks)
> > > > without the constant stress of running.
> > >
> > > If that's all you think tennis is then you'll get swept in
little
> > > time.
> >
> > Maybe .... maybe not.
>
> Then it's $40k for the best of 7 match since you're too stupid to
> realize it?

Nope. Both bets are equal as you originally specified.

Ok. $40k each. done deal. Your rules. Swallow hard and say YES.

> What a whiner! I suppose you'll want me to feel bad taking your

cash
> when I beat you in both, so I'll just give it back. I mean, no

one

> will think it's fair that I collect after seeing how I'm still in
> decent shape while you struggle with this and that. And besides,

I

> LOOK like a tennis player. Whoever saw one that looks like Pudgy
the
> gimp anyway??

I've seen many a poor tennis player that was in good shape. Your
point?

That's the kind of thinking i like!

> > > > > You did everything but set it up. Why am I not surprised.
> > > Blabbing
> > > > > excuse after excuse about the video poker belly--let's

save

> the
> > > > > laughs for judgement day. I see you're even hoping that

we

> > won't
> > > > > play. I've never lost to a fat ass and I won't now.
> > > >
> > > > Then why do you keep avoiding the bet? The only conclusion
> anyone
> > > > reading this can come to is that you're afraid of me (and

my

> > > belly). LMBO.
> > >
> > > What part of "so let's work out the dates" confuses you?? I
can't
> > > even see your loophole this time around.
> >
> > I'm still waiting for you to drop your "I know I'm going lose

so

I
> > need 3rd bet" condition. You know the one you will always
have ...
> > and you can take that to the bank.
>
> I already said it was not related to the other two. Stop stalling
for
> time to locate another escape route.

Is your backhand of way of accepting YOUR ORIGINAL challenges 1)

and

2) without a 3rd safety option? Your remember, from msg 4446:

1. Little dicky has been saying he can beat me in the best of 7
tennis. I say he can't....and he can't. I'm in FAR better shape, I
play about twice a week, and he's a dufus. $20,000 cash.

2. Little dicky has been saying he can beat me in (GULP!) BOWLING,
best score after 10 games. I say he can't. And he can't. While most
bowlers are fat and he has the edge there--and while I haven't
touched a bowling ball in years--a weeks' of practice is all it'll
take for my superior mind and body to overcome the video poker

belly.

$20,000 cash.

Now, will Robbie simply say "yes"? Nope, he will continue to
scramble ... you can take that to the bank.

All those words mumbled as if they came out of the world's most
nervous mouth. You don't want to jog? Week knees?? OK. Two even, $40k
bets. Set it up and stop whining and squirming!!!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > > > > HAHA!! You can 'play tennis' but you can't jog!!
> > > > >
> > > > > You should know there's a big difference when you had

your

> foot
> > > > > problems. In tennis it's a few side-side movements (and
> breaks)
> > > > > without the constant stress of running.
> > > >
> > > > If that's all you think tennis is then you'll get swept in
> little
> > > > time.
> > >
> > > Maybe .... maybe not.
> >
> > Then it's $40k for the best of 7 match since you're too stupid

to

> > realize it?
>
> Nope. Both bets are equal as you originally specified.

Ok. $40k each. done deal. Your rules. Swallow hard and say YES.
>> > What a whiner! I suppose you'll want me to feel bad taking

your

> cash
> > when I beat you in both, so I'll just give it back. I mean, no
one
> > will think it's fair that I collect after seeing how I'm still

in

> > decent shape while you struggle with this and that. And

besides,

I
> > LOOK like a tennis player. Whoever saw one that looks like

Pudgy

> the
> > gimp anyway??
>
> I've seen many a poor tennis player that was in good shape. Your
> point?

That's the kind of thinking i like!

> > > > > > You did everything but set it up. Why am I not

surprised.

> > > > Blabbing
> > > > > > excuse after excuse about the video poker belly--let's
save
> > the
> > > > > > laughs for judgement day. I see you're even hoping that
we
> > > won't
> > > > > > play. I've never lost to a fat ass and I won't now.
> > > > >
> > > > > Then why do you keep avoiding the bet? The only

conclusion

> > anyone
> > > > > reading this can come to is that you're afraid of me (and
my
> > > > belly). LMBO.
> > > >
> > > > What part of "so let's work out the dates" confuses you?? I
> can't
> > > > even see your loophole this time around.
> > >
> > > I'm still waiting for you to drop your "I know I'm going lose
so
> I
> > > need 3rd bet" condition. You know the one you will always
> have ...
> > > and you can take that to the bank.
> >
> > I already said it was not related to the other two. Stop

stalling

> for
> > time to locate another escape route.
>
> Is your backhand of way of accepting YOUR ORIGINAL challenges 1)
and
> 2) without a 3rd safety option? Your remember, from msg 4446:
>
> 1. Little dicky has been saying he can beat me in the best of 7
> tennis. I say he can't....and he can't. I'm in FAR better shape, I
> play about twice a week, and he's a dufus. $20,000 cash.
>
> 2. Little dicky has been saying he can beat me in (GULP!) BOWLING,
> best score after 10 games. I say he can't. And he can't. While

most

> bowlers are fat and he has the edge there--and while I haven't
> touched a bowling ball in years--a weeks' of practice is all it'll
> take for my superior mind and body to overcome the video poker
belly.
> $20,000 cash.
>
> Now, will Robbie simply say "yes"? Nope, he will continue to
> scramble ... you can take that to the bank.

All those words mumbled as if they came out of the world's most
nervous mouth. You don't want to jog? Week knees?? OK. Two even,

$40k

bets. Set it up and stop whining and squirming!!!

Does anyone else find it interesting that Rob won't stick with his
original $20K figures? Clearly he thinks I can't come up with $80K so
he's taking this approach instead of the old 3rd option. Anyone else
think he will find another way to back down if I accept? Or, raise it
even higher? This would be an interesting poll.

I will give my answer in a couple of days. But, until then, keep the
Memorial day weekend open.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

[Rob_Singer1]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
>
> > > > > > > HAHA!! You can 'play tennis' but you can't jog!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You should know there's a big difference when you had
your
> > foot
> > > > > > problems. In tennis it's a few side-side movements (and
> > breaks)
> > > > > > without the constant stress of running.
> > > > >
> > > > > If that's all you think tennis is then you'll get swept

in

> > little
> > > > > time.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe .... maybe not.
> > >
> > > Then it's $40k for the best of 7 match since you're too

stupid

to
> > > realize it?
> >
> > Nope. Both bets are equal as you originally specified.
>
> Ok. $40k each. done deal. Your rules. Swallow hard and say YES.
> >> > What a whiner! I suppose you'll want me to feel bad taking
your
> > cash
> > > when I beat you in both, so I'll just give it back. I mean,

no

> one
> > > will think it's fair that I collect after seeing how I'm

still

in
> > > decent shape while you struggle with this and that. And
besides,
> I
> > > LOOK like a tennis player. Whoever saw one that looks like
Pudgy
> > the
> > > gimp anyway??
> >
> > I've seen many a poor tennis player that was in good shape.

Your

> > point?
>
> That's the kind of thinking i like!
>
> > > > > > > You did everything but set it up. Why am I not
surprised.
> > > > > Blabbing
> > > > > > > excuse after excuse about the video poker belly--

let's

> save
> > > the
> > > > > > > laughs for judgement day. I see you're even hoping

that

> we
> > > > won't
> > > > > > > play. I've never lost to a fat ass and I won't now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Then why do you keep avoiding the bet? The only
conclusion
> > > anyone
> > > > > > reading this can come to is that you're afraid of me

(and

> my
> > > > > belly). LMBO.
> > > > >
> > > > > What part of "so let's work out the dates" confuses you??

I

> > can't
> > > > > even see your loophole this time around.
> > > >
> > > > I'm still waiting for you to drop your "I know I'm going

lose

> so
> > I
> > > > need 3rd bet" condition. You know the one you will always
> > have ...
> > > > and you can take that to the bank.
> > >
> > > I already said it was not related to the other two. Stop
stalling
> > for
> > > time to locate another escape route.
> >
> > Is your backhand of way of accepting YOUR ORIGINAL challenges

1)

> and
> > 2) without a 3rd safety option? Your remember, from msg 4446:
> >
> > 1. Little dicky has been saying he can beat me in the best of 7
> > tennis. I say he can't....and he can't. I'm in FAR better

shape, I

> > play about twice a week, and he's a dufus. $20,000 cash.
> >
> > 2. Little dicky has been saying he can beat me in (GULP!)

BOWLING,

> > best score after 10 games. I say he can't. And he can't. While
most
> > bowlers are fat and he has the edge there--and while I haven't
> > touched a bowling ball in years--a weeks' of practice is all

it'll

> > take for my superior mind and body to overcome the video poker
> belly.
> > $20,000 cash.
> >
> > Now, will Robbie simply say "yes"? Nope, he will continue to
> > scramble ... you can take that to the bank.
>
> All those words mumbled as if they came out of the world's most
> nervous mouth. You don't want to jog? Week knees?? OK. Two even,
$40k
> bets. Set it up and stop whining and squirming!!!

Does anyone else find it interesting that Rob won't stick with his
original $20K figures? Clearly he thinks I can't come up with $80K

so

he's taking this approach instead of the old 3rd option. Anyone

else

think he will find another way to back down if I accept? Or, raise

it

even higher? This would be an interesting poll.

I will give my answer in a couple of days. But, until then, keep

the Memorial day weekend open.

The additional $20k/event is a punishment for all your pussy-footing
around all the time. You'd BETTER be able to come up with more than
$80k if you're gonna wait a few more days for an answer. The bet goes
up $10k/event per day of diddling. So get with it.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@> wrote:

[rgmustain]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > >
> > > Is your backhand of way of accepting YOUR ORIGINAL challenges
1)
> > and
> > > 2) without a 3rd safety option? Your remember, from msg 4446:
> > >
> > > 1. Little dicky has been saying he can beat me in the best of

7

> > > tennis. I say he can't....and he can't. I'm in FAR better
shape, I
> > > play about twice a week, and he's a dufus. $20,000 cash.
> > >
> > > 2. Little dicky has been saying he can beat me in (GULP!)
BOWLING,
> > > best score after 10 games. I say he can't. And he can't.

While

> most
> > > bowlers are fat and he has the edge there--and while I haven't
> > > touched a bowling ball in years--a weeks' of practice is all
it'll
> > > take for my superior mind and body to overcome the video

poker

> > belly.
> > > $20,000 cash.
> > >
> > > Now, will Robbie simply say "yes"? Nope, he will continue to
> > > scramble ... you can take that to the bank.
> >
> > All those words mumbled as if they came out of the world's most
> > nervous mouth. You don't want to jog? Week knees?? OK. Two

even,

> $40k
> > bets. Set it up and stop whining and squirming!!!
>
> Does anyone else find it interesting that Rob won't stick with

his

> original $20K figures? Clearly he thinks I can't come up with

$80K

so
> he's taking this approach instead of the old 3rd option. Anyone
else
> think he will find another way to back down if I accept? Or,

raise

it
> even higher? This would be an interesting poll.
>
> I will give my answer in a couple of days. But, until then, keep
the Memorial day weekend open.

The additional $20k/event is a punishment for all your pussy-

footing

around all the time. You'd BETTER be able to come up with more than
$80k if you're gonna wait a few more days for an answer. The bet

goes

up $10k/event per day of diddling. So get with it.

So, you're saying the longer I wait the more money I'll make ...
interesting.

[Rob_Singer1]

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Is your backhand of way of accepting YOUR ORIGINAL

challenges

> 1)
> > > and
> > > > 2) without a 3rd safety option? Your remember, from msg

4446:

> > > >
> > > > 1. Little dicky has been saying he can beat me in the best

of

7
> > > > tennis. I say he can't....and he can't. I'm in FAR better
> shape, I
> > > > play about twice a week, and he's a dufus. $20,000 cash.
> > > >
> > > > 2. Little dicky has been saying he can beat me in (GULP!)
> BOWLING,
> > > > best score after 10 games. I say he can't. And he can't.
While
> > most
> > > > bowlers are fat and he has the edge there--and while I

haven't

> > > > touched a bowling ball in years--a weeks' of practice is

all

> it'll
> > > > take for my superior mind and body to overcome the video
poker
> > > belly.
> > > > $20,000 cash.
> > > >
> > > > Now, will Robbie simply say "yes"? Nope, he will continue

to

> > > > scramble ... you can take that to the bank.
> > >
> > > All those words mumbled as if they came out of the world's

most

> > > nervous mouth. You don't want to jog? Week knees?? OK. Two
even,
> > $40k
> > > bets. Set it up and stop whining and squirming!!!
> >
> > Does anyone else find it interesting that Rob won't stick with
his
> > original $20K figures? Clearly he thinks I can't come up with
$80K
> so
> > he's taking this approach instead of the old 3rd option. Anyone
> else
> > think he will find another way to back down if I accept? Or,
raise
> it
> > even higher? This would be an interesting poll.
> >
> > I will give my answer in a couple of days. But, until then,

keep

> the Memorial day weekend open.
>
> The additional $20k/event is a punishment for all your pussy-
footing
> around all the time. You'd BETTER be able to come up with more

than

> $80k if you're gonna wait a few more days for an answer. The bet
goes
> up $10k/event per day of diddling. So get with it.

So, you're saying the longer I wait the more money I'll make ...
interesting.

When it comes to watching you squirm like a snake caught in a trap,
take your time.....

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote: