"Intuition" has nothing to do with correct VP strategy. Casinos LOVE people
who play by "intuition!"
Try reading Bob Dancer's Video Poker 365 articles, dated 6/5, 6/12, and
6/19/08, which discuss this game.
And certainly, Quick Quads return would be much higher than the base game
without the Quick Quad feature. Except that it costs you an extra coin per line
to play the game!
Brian
···
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
In a message dated 9/6/2008 8:50:52 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
straub@shore.net writes:
Like Scot, I just heard of this game yesterday. My intution is that
the strategy would be the same as regular 9/6 JoB, except if you get
a quick quad hand on the deal, you keep the quick quad hand (although
from what I've read I think the machine may keep it for you
automatically anyway).
If you are dealt three of a kind, whether you are playing regular 9/6
J0B or the quick quad variation, you would hold the same hand: the
three of a kind.
The only remote possible difference would be whether you would throw
away a full house in Quick Quads, and without explicitly doing
the math, my intuition tells me you would keep the full house in
quick quads as well.
Therefore, there would be no change in strategy (that I can think of).
Since, however, quick quads provides more ways to get a four of a
kind, the potential payback percentage would be higher than regular
9/6 JoB, but I'll leave it to the quant jockeys to do the precise
payback increase.
ST
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "nshoreslim" <nshoreslim@...> wrote:
Hello everyone,
Is the return for 9/6 job quick quads just the standard job 99.5
even
with the quick quad bonusing feature? I thought it would be
higher.
Also has anyone seen a strategy published anywhere for this game?
Thanks.
**************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog,
plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com.
(http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014)
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]