vpFREE2 Forums

8 NOV 2005 Bob Dancer CasinoGaming Column

Skip wrote:

  This column is well written, but poorly named, IMO. A better title
might be "If you're not a Pro, you're a loser and don't know anything
about Video Poker", or even better - "If you can't defend your position,
denigrate your opponent". The remarks about Paymar, even if accurate
(and I have no comment about that), were particularly gratuitous. I
think you get more respect if you sell your ideas on their merits rather
than attacking your competitors. Moreover, once you start getting into
attack mode, you have no complaints coming when you are on the other end.
The penalty card/no penalty card discussion can be argued without this.
Skip

Skip is apparently referring to Bob's statements:

1. "Paymar also wrote that if four-of-a-kinds weren't coming around
frequently enough in Full Pay Deuces Wild, you should cut back to one
coin at a time until the machine starts rewarding your adequately."

I challenge Bob to indicate the source of this quote. I never wrote
anything like that. And I hope my grammar is better than that.

2. "Paymar published a newsletter that talked about such things as
"Same Rank Anomaly" (which was basically a theory that the machines
weren't fair --- he was proud of this theory --- he published it in
numerous other places than just his newsletter. And he would explain
proudly that he wasn't afraid of controversy and that many others had
given him heat for this theory.)"

Yes, I have written about several apparent anomalies, but never
suggested that the machines weren't fair. I am never afraid of
controversy. It may be worthwhile noting that my observations (not
theories) of anomalies are published in a separate booklet titled,
"Video Poker Anomalies and Anecdotes" which includes the disclaimer
on the title page, "This book is not about winning play. -- READ THIS
BOOK JUST FOR FUN". BTW, I still publish that newsletter, and I still
occasionally discuss reported anomalies.

Several readers have written to me saying that they had observed
these phenomena and kept statistics (as I have) documenting their
existence. It is my opinion that anyone who plays these machines and
doesn't believe that anomalies might exist has far too much faith in
regulations and government edicts.

I don't think there is any need for me to defend myself here. My
publications speak for themselves.

Dan

···

--
Dan Paymar
Author of best selling book, "Video Poker - Optimum Play"
Editor/Publisher of VP newsletter "Video Poker Times"
Developer of VP analysis/trainer software "Optimum Video Poker"
Visit my web site at www.OptimumPlay.com

"Chance favors the prepared mind." -- Louis Pasteur

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I agree with Dan.
Anyone who has played a substantial amount of video poker will notice the anomalies or peculiarities of video poker or any other game with a supposedly random number generator.
I've worked in electronic repair and know there can be intermittent gliches in a computer circuit or other electronics.It's all about electrons.
Electrons can behave differently with changes in temperature,hot and cold and atmospheric changes.
It may not be that noticeable,but it definately can affect an RNG.

Seussman

···

----- Original Message -----
  From: Dan Paymar
  To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 4:24 PM
  Subject: [vpFREE] Re: Re: 8 NOV 2005 Bob Dancer CasinoGaming Column

  Skip wrote:
  > This column is well written, but poorly named, IMO. A better title
  >might be "If you're not a Pro, you're a loser and don't know anything
  >about Video Poker", or even better - "If you can't defend your position,
  >denigrate your opponent". The remarks about Paymar, even if accurate
  >(and I have no comment about that), were particularly gratuitous. I
  >think you get more respect if you sell your ideas on their merits rather
  >than attacking your competitors. Moreover, once you start getting into
  >attack mode, you have no complaints coming when you are on the other end.
  > The penalty card/no penalty card discussion can be argued without this.
  >Skip

  Skip is apparently referring to Bob's statements:

  1. "Paymar also wrote that if four-of-a-kinds weren't coming around
  frequently enough in Full Pay Deuces Wild, you should cut back to one
  coin at a time until the machine starts rewarding your adequately."

  I challenge Bob to indicate the source of this quote. I never wrote
  anything like that. And I hope my grammar is better than that.

  2. "Paymar published a newsletter that talked about such things as
  "Same Rank Anomaly" (which was basically a theory that the machines
  weren't fair --- he was proud of this theory --- he published it in
  numerous other places than just his newsletter. And he would explain
  proudly that he wasn't afraid of controversy and that many others had
  given him heat for this theory.)"

  Yes, I have written about several apparent anomalies, but never
  suggested that the machines weren't fair. I am never afraid of
  controversy. It may be worthwhile noting that my observations (not
  theories) of anomalies are published in a separate booklet titled,
  "Video Poker Anomalies and Anecdotes" which includes the disclaimer
  on the title page, "This book is not about winning play. -- READ THIS
  BOOK JUST FOR FUN". BTW, I still publish that newsletter, and I still
  occasionally discuss reported anomalies.

  Several readers have written to me saying that they had observed
  these phenomena and kept statistics (as I have) documenting their
  existence. It is my opinion that anyone who plays these machines and
  doesn't believe that anomalies might exist has far too much faith in
  regulations and government edicts.

  I don't think there is any need for me to defend myself here. My
  publications speak for themselves.

  Dan

  vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

    a.. Visit your group "vpFREE" on the web.
      
    b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
     vpFREE-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      
    c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

<<Electrons can behave differently with changes in temperature,hot and cold
and atmospheric changes.
It may not be that noticeable,but it definately can affect an RNG.>>

I'll take that bet!

Cogno

Yes, I have written about several apparent anomalies, but never

suggested that the machines weren't fair. I am never afraid of
controversy. It may be worthwhile noting that my observations (not
theories) of anomalies are published in a separate booklet
titled, "Video Poker Anomalies and Anecdotes" which includes the
disclaimer on the title page, "This book is not about winning play. --
READ THIS BOOK JUST FOR FUN". BTW, I still publish that newsletter, and
I still occasionally discuss reported anomalies. Several readers have
written to me saying that they had observed these phenomena and kept
statistics (as I have) documenting their existence. It is my opinion
that anyone who plays these machines and doesn't believe that anomalies
might exist has far too much faith in regulations and government edicts.

Are talking about break-downs in the pseudo-random number generator,
such as patterns appearing before the prng is "reset" with a new seed.
I'm sure the prng's generate good results on a long term basis. I just
wonder if there are any short term biases that could be detected, but
which cancel out each other in the long run.

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, Dan Paymar <Dan@O...> wrote: