vpFREE2 Forums

240K royal

#1

Which would make sense, because isn't this a $2800/hour play?

If you can get in 1200 hands/hr with perfect play. I'd give it more like
$1800/hr plus all the Reward Credits you can eat.

<<Yes, but the ROR is too great for most folks. If my math is correct,
you'd need a bankroll in excess of $4 million to have a 50/50 chance of not
going bankrupt before you realize any profit.>>

That's not what is usually meant by Risk of Ruin. The percentage refers to
the chance of NEVER going broke playing the game forever and never adding
funds to your bankroll. $4M would give you a better than 98% chance of
achieving that according to VPW, while a mere $318k would give you a 50-50
shot.

Cogno

#2

Cogno Scienti wrote:

That's not what is usually meant by Risk of Ruin. The percentage
refers to the chance of NEVER going broke playing the game forever and
never adding funds to your bankroll. $4M would give you a better than
98% chance of achieving that according to VPW, while a mere $318k
would give you a 50-50 shot.

Add in a modest amount of cb and I have to think there'd be at least
one team of $5 players who were all over this. Gotta be some juicy
story behind the play.

- H.

#3

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Harry Porter" <harry.porter@...>
wrote:

Cogno Scienti wrote:
> That's not what is usually meant by Risk of Ruin. The percentage
> refers to the chance of NEVER going broke playing the game

forever and

> never adding funds to your bankroll. $4M would give you a better

than

> 98% chance of achieving that according to VPW, while a mere $318k
> would give you a 50-50 shot.

Add in a modest amount of cb and I have to think there'd be at least
one team of $5 players who were all over this. Gotta be some juicy
story behind the play.

- H.

Is kinda thingie I takes a shot at when way up early AM and don't
feel yet like beddie bye or getting cut a big check. But if you are
at the cage and a felt tip handy? scribe a big N/A on any strat chart
you been using. Perfect playing as you wish? Is called luck. And why
else. EA

#4

About eleven, sir.

TC

···

On 4/24/07, DIP <crazydonconcepts@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

  --- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com <vpFREE%40yahoogroups.com>, "Harry Porter"
<harry.porter@...>
wrote:
>
> Cogno Scienti wrote:
> > That's not what is usually meant by Risk of Ruin. The percentage
> > refers to the chance of NEVER going broke playing the game
forever and
> > never adding funds to your bankroll. $4M would give you a better
than
> > 98% chance of achieving that according to VPW, while a mere $318k
> > would give you a 50-50 shot.
>
> Add in a modest amount of cb and I have to think there'd be at least
> one team of $5 players who were all over this. Gotta be some juicy
> story behind the play.
>
> - H.
>
Is kinda thingie I takes a shot at when way up early AM and don't
feel yet like beddie bye or getting cut a big check. But if you are
at the cage and a felt tip handy? scribe a big N/A on any strat chart
you been using. Perfect playing as you wish? Is called luck. And why
else. EA

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

#5

???

···

--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Tabby Cat" <tabbycat@...> wrote:

About eleven, sir.

TC