Scot: It still comes down to a bottom line calculation.
$30 per hour times 10 hours = $300 .If the place where I would normally stay and play has a play at $10 per hour expectation and gives me comps worth $100, then I am better off playing at the $30/ hour establishment.
If, however, my personal requirement was a suite and gourmet meals at every opportunity, and for this I play a game with a minimal per hour profit say $5 per hour, i.e. Pick-em at The Hilton or at Paris then the decision would go the other way if I valued the suite and gourmet food at greater than $250 per day.
Like I said before , assign a personal value to all things in a casino, add up the numbers and the choice will usually be clear, but not the same for everybody .
Using another comp or offer usually requires play at that establishment, unless this is a farewell stiff job to a place that I don't want to return to. I usually don't have the time to give meaningful play to places where I am not staying. If I did have the time, then the same decision making formula applies, except the result would be different .
Regards
A.P.
···
----- Original Message -----
From: Scot Krause
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 12:49 PM
Subject: RE: [vpFREE] Re: $1 FPDW
>Albert,
On a play that's valued at about $30 an hour, if you had the bankroll to
play it, wouldn't you just pay for the room of your choice somewhere
else (or use another comp or offer)?
Scot
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]