vpFREE2 Forums

Where's Our Resident Peacenik?

#21

> Well, because many of the misled critics are lined up saying GWB
> wanted 'the oil' or 'to finish daddy's job' the liberal answer to
that
> is yes. But don't forget, the WMD issue isn't over and as I
predicted
> long ago, Syria has them and will make a mistake sometime in the
near
> future.

When pigs fly.

Well let's hope they don't. But these fanatics aren't your normal
criminals.

And how many will die BEFORE we actually do something? You have no
idea what is going on in Sudan which is obvious from your illogical
statements.

You're partially correct. I don't keep up with Sudan, but I was there
twice - in 1981 & 2002 and what I said is true.

About the same threat as Iraq was a couple of years ago. Show me

just

ONE piece of evidence that Iraq was a larger threat. The facts are
conclusive. Sudan has much closer ties to terrorists than Iraq ever
had.

That's just it. I and others cannot disclose what is known to the
Gov't. -- at least up until the time my ties were severed. However,
as a layman it's easy to distinguish the terror threat of Iraq. For
starters, Saddam paid the families of Palestinian bombers. After 9-
11, Bush clearly said no country that supports or harbors terrorists
will be spared. Is any more detailed information required in order to
convince that he/Iraq supported terrorism?

Excuse me!!!!!!!!!!!! This is OUR country, not Ws. The average
citizen doesn't need to know specifics, but they should be made

aware of the issues.

I'm sorry, but there is so much going on that you & I will never
know. That's part of the security of what's going on.
  

Then why did we invade Iraq? That is counter to this argument.

No. They supported terrorism and harbored terrorists. They still do,
only on a much larger scale. The military is happy about this because
we can exterminate them all that much quicker.

You've got to be kidding. Any threat from Iraq is OVER. There would
be no reason to keep it hidden IF THERE WAS EVER A THREAT. The fact

W provides no information is proof that no threat ever existed.

The threat in Iraq is not from the country since we wiped out the
dictatorship, but from the terrorists who are there. Just like this
stupid wiretapping issue, there is much going on that IS hidden from
you & I.

It's really hilarious that you'd make idiotic statements like this.
Do you really think anyone believes this BS?

The right people who are in charge of protecting us know these facts,
and that's the only thing that's important. They're keeping an eye on
Syria, in fact, my son is part of that strategy.

This sounds EXACTLY like your statements from last year when you

said we would SOON understand how W was dealing with the insurgents.
Nothing happened then because nothing was planned ... "privy" or
otherwise.

Just like always, you want everything to happen NOW. The war should
be over, we should have our troops home, the terrorists should give
up, OBL should be captured. What a disappointment it must have been
to you when we found Saddam in hiding!

> That's what creates critics--little knowledge of
> the facts.

That describes you in a nutshell.

One problem---I'm not a critic.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#22

I know right from left. I know truth from bullshit. You know
ignorance is bliss. And we both know that revolutionaries were in
militias and they did military active duty. Explain to me how any
foreign combatant fighting in Iraq is right?? I hope we aren't
soldiers of fortune, simple mercs. We no more belong in Iraq than we
did in Nam. So, mac-sog boy dazzle us with your tales of OCONUS
combat. You are getting boring here singer.
John
P.S. – Has anyone seen my Constitutional rights??

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

> Nobody's has to pay me to tell the truth.

Oh that's right. Liberals know right from wrong. The only they

can't

do right is get elected. Hmmm.....

>Actually my time was spent behind a pair of 50cals as a nose

gunner

on a US Navy PBR.

You're always behind something.

>All those
> who served in the Revolutionary war are Patriots and Freedom
> Fighters.

But wait a minute - They weren't signed up as soldiers! So which

is

it, really?

>As I said previously, the Brits called them insurgents.

So our forefathers are the modern day equivalent of a terrorist
fighter from Algeria who goes to Iraq and blows himself up! Are

you

on the ball or what!!!

> But seriously singer, thank for making all those dental
appointments for military dependents, and sorting the mail. Your
service is appreciated as much as Karl Rove's, Dick Cheney's and

W's

was during Vietnam.

My service wasn't in Vietnam. Maybe that's why we lost. I was in

far

more dangerous places. What'd you do, fight mosquitos most of the

day

···

BEHIND those guns?

#23

The first truth I've ever heard you post.
John
P.S. – Has anyone seen my Constitutional rights??

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

> From the majority of your posts, I would say that you are a VP
> addict drunken bum. You have no credibility except that stupid
> system of your that doesn't add up.

How this in any way relates to the topic I'll never know. But if you
say that it's just an angry old man griping about what's passed him

by,

···

I'd understand.

#24

First of all, Hey Dick!! What's up?
Singer, do you have proof on that Sudan comment?? I doubt it.
Please explain to me how Saddam was any kind of threat to America.
What gives us the right to interfere with a regime that is no threat
to us and then authorize torture on it's citizens. We kill Innocent
Iraqi civilians on a daily basis over there. I can't see how you
believe all the bullshit that you keep regurgating (look it up).
John
P.S. – Has anyone seen my Constitutional rights??

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> Do you really think the US would/could have gone into Iraq

without

the fabricated WMD threat?

Well, because many of the misled critics are lined up saying GWB
wanted 'the oil' or 'to finish daddy's job' the liberal answer to

that

is yes. But don't forget, the WMD issue isn't over and as I

predicted

long ago, Syria has them and will make a mistake sometime in the

near

future.

> By the way, the current regime in Sudan has harbored terrorists

and

is
> responsible for close to 200K murders. Have you heard the great
> humanitarian GWB suggesting we go there and eliminate this

dictator?

Behind doors that you don't know exist, Sudan has been and is

being

handled under the radar. The question you should be asking is how

much

of a threat is what's going on in Sudan to the US? And how many
terrorists are there in hiding? GWB has those answers, and just

like

the wiretapping issue that irritates you critics, you just don't

need

to know.

> How about the other dozens of dictators around the world? Do you
thinbk we should we police the world?

If they're a threat to us in the war on terror, yes.

> Now, why do YOU think we invaded Iraq but ignored all the other
> dictators?

Level of threat. GWB tells the public what they want to hear--that

we

ridded the country of a viscious dictator who's killed & tortured
thousands of his own people. What he isn't telling is the level of

the

threat from Iraq because too much info helps the enemy. It is high

and

has always been high, and left unchecked, the WMD's he passed into
Syria would right now be in Al Q's hands because there IS a link

that

you aren't privy to. That's what creates critics--little knowledge

of

the facts. Just like the idiot who wrote about the wiretapping

issue,

···

some eventual yahoo will come along and dig into that too.

#25

You are the most critical bastard I have ever read. You pretend to
be in the know, important, connected, but all your comments are
moronic. Why are you bringing your son into your lies, is he going
to inherit "the family business" of lying?
When you were in Sudan twice, how was the VP? Can't imagine why else
you would go there except maybe the sex with children angle.
With all the countries in the world that harbor terroists, isn' it
ironic that we invaded the one with the most oil? No WMD's, no link
to Al Quida or 9-11. Most of the 9-11 terrorists came from Saudi
Arabia and we were actively fighting and winning in Afghanistan (not
any more) so why Iraq??? Boggles the mind of a thinking person.
John
P.S. – Has anyone seen my Constitutional rights??

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> > Well, because many of the misled critics are lined up saying

GWB

> > wanted 'the oil' or 'to finish daddy's job' the liberal answer

to

> that
> > is yes. But don't forget, the WMD issue isn't over and as I
> predicted
> > long ago, Syria has them and will make a mistake sometime in

the

> near
> > future.
>
> When pigs fly.

Well let's hope they don't. But these fanatics aren't your normal
criminals.
>
> And how many will die BEFORE we actually do something? You have

no

> idea what is going on in Sudan which is obvious from your

illogical

> statements.

You're partially correct. I don't keep up with Sudan, but I was

there

twice - in 1981 & 2002 and what I said is true.

> About the same threat as Iraq was a couple of years ago. Show me
just
> ONE piece of evidence that Iraq was a larger threat. The facts

are

> conclusive. Sudan has much closer ties to terrorists than Iraq

ever

> had.

That's just it. I and others cannot disclose what is known to the
Gov't. -- at least up until the time my ties were severed.

However,

as a layman it's easy to distinguish the terror threat of Iraq.

For

starters, Saddam paid the families of Palestinian bombers. After 9-
11, Bush clearly said no country that supports or harbors

terrorists

will be spared. Is any more detailed information required in order

to

convince that he/Iraq supported terrorism?
>
> Excuse me!!!!!!!!!!!! This is OUR country, not Ws. The average
> citizen doesn't need to know specifics, but they should be made
aware of the issues.

I'm sorry, but there is so much going on that you & I will never
know. That's part of the security of what's going on.
  
> Then why did we invade Iraq? That is counter to this argument.

No. They supported terrorism and harbored terrorists. They still

do,

only on a much larger scale. The military is happy about this

because

we can exterminate them all that much quicker.

> You've got to be kidding. Any threat from Iraq is OVER. There

would

> be no reason to keep it hidden IF THERE WAS EVER A THREAT. The

fact

W provides no information is proof that no threat ever existed.

The threat in Iraq is not from the country since we wiped out the
dictatorship, but from the terrorists who are there. Just like

this

stupid wiretapping issue, there is much going on that IS hidden

from

you & I.
>
> It's really hilarious that you'd make idiotic statements like

this.

> Do you really think anyone believes this BS?

The right people who are in charge of protecting us know these

facts,

and that's the only thing that's important. They're keeping an eye

on

Syria, in fact, my son is part of that strategy.

>This sounds EXACTLY like your statements from last year when you
said we would SOON understand how W was dealing with the

insurgents.

Nothing happened then because nothing was planned ... "privy" or
otherwise.

Just like always, you want everything to happen NOW. The war

should

be over, we should have our troops home, the terrorists should

give

up, OBL should be captured. What a disappointment it must have

been

···

to you when we found Saddam in hiding!
>
> > That's what creates critics--little knowledge of
> > the facts.
>
> That describes you in a nutshell.

One problem---I'm not a critic.

#26

A little proof on Syria would be nice too. I mean beside some
retired, has been general you saw on Faux news.
John
P.S. – Has anyone seen my Constitutional rights??

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:
>
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
>
> > Do you really think the US would/could have gone into Iraq
without
> the fabricated WMD threat?
>
> Well, because many of the misled critics are lined up saying GWB
> wanted 'the oil' or 'to finish daddy's job' the liberal answer

to

that
> is yes. But don't forget, the WMD issue isn't over and as I
predicted
> long ago, Syria has them and will make a mistake sometime in the
near
> future.
>
> > By the way, the current regime in Sudan has harbored

terrorists

and
> is
> > responsible for close to 200K murders. Have you heard the

great

> > humanitarian GWB suggesting we go there and eliminate this
dictator?
>
> Behind doors that you don't know exist, Sudan has been and is
being
> handled under the radar. The question you should be asking is

how

much
> of a threat is what's going on in Sudan to the US? And how many
> terrorists are there in hiding? GWB has those answers, and just
like
> the wiretapping issue that irritates you critics, you just don't
need
> to know.
>
> > How about the other dozens of dictators around the world? Do

you

> thinbk we should we police the world?
>
> If they're a threat to us in the war on terror, yes.
>
> > Now, why do YOU think we invaded Iraq but ignored all the

other

> > dictators?
>
> Level of threat. GWB tells the public what they want to hear--

that

we
> ridded the country of a viscious dictator who's killed &

tortured

> thousands of his own people. What he isn't telling is the level

of

the
> threat from Iraq because too much info helps the enemy. It is

high

and
> has always been high, and left unchecked, the WMD's he passed

into

> Syria would right now be in Al Q's hands because there IS a link
that
> you aren't privy to. That's what creates critics--little

knowledge

···

of
> the facts. Just like the idiot who wrote about the wiretapping
issue,
> some eventual yahoo will come along and dig into that too.
>

#27

I know right from left. I know truth from bullshit. You know
ignorance is bliss.

You're a misled bitter and lonely soul who appears to be on the verge
of hari-kari since you disagree with everything that's decent and
proper and you can't do a thing about it.

And we both know that revolutionaries were in

militias and they did military active duty.

I know different. I have family members (by marriage) who's ancestors
from that time period were asked to join the fight right from the
farms. Most were not in any type of military.

Explain to me how any

foreign combatant fighting in Iraq is right??

What? Some sense? Foreigners who are fighting as insurgents are ALL
wrong.

I hope we aren't

soldiers of fortune, simple mercs. We no more belong in Iraq than

we did in Nam. So, mac-sog boy dazzle us with your tales of OCONUS

combat. You are getting boring here singer.

Not hard to figure you are a traiterous veteran. Vietnam did mess the
minds of of many, and the rest of us have to accept people like you
as casualties of that war. Wouldn't you really be better off staring
at the Vietnam War Memorial in DC for 16 hours a day honoring your
fellow soldiers than to go thru whatever you're going thru right now?

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

#28

First of all, Hey Dick!! What's up?

Are you talking to dicky the denyer....or that puny thing that won't
dance anymore when you look to the south?

Singer, do you have proof on that Sudan comment?? I doubt it.

Yes.

Please explain to me how Saddam was any kind of threat to America.

1. WMD's used in the past, and if he had them or could ever get his
hands on them again he'd most likely sell to Al Q for use against us.
Of course, that's the kind of preventative effort that critics like
you need to see happen in the USA again before you finally wake up.
And even then, all you'd say is "It's GWB's fault for not protecting
us;Wawawawawawa......."

2. He supported terrorists. Palentinian and Al Q. GWB was clear about
that. Of course your only argument is that he was such a good man
that he NEVER would have been in touch with Al Q. Again, the only way
you'd ever learn your lesson is via the worst way--WMD going off over
here or any major attack again like 9-11.

What gives us the right to interfere with a regime that is no

threat

to us and then authorize torture on it's citizens. We kill Innocent
Iraqi civilians on a daily basis over there. I can't see how you
believe all the bullshit that you keep regurgating (look it up).

What you need is a dose of reality. Too bad you can't travel to Iraq
and ask the people for yourself. My son tells me all the time of how
the normal people come up to them and thank them in tears for all
they've done and sacraficed. The BS about torture you know is from
your partisan media with an agenda of sour grapes over the great
GWB's election wins. One or two bad apples doesn't stop the ship, and
the Iraqui people understand that more than you or Kennedy or any
other fanatic peacenik in this country. Saddam being gone is FAR
better than him still being a grutal dictator. As leaders of the free
world, it was our right and duty to dislodge him.
What is this about 'innocent civilians that bothes you? you didn't
kill them in Vietnam?? We didn't whack them in Japan? It's war you
fool.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

#29

You are the most critical bastard I have ever read.

It's very hard to tell you've ever DONE anything important---let
alone READ about it.

You pretend to

be in the know, important, connected, but all your comments are
moronic. Why are you bringing your son into your lies, is he going
to inherit "the family business" of lying?

Luckily, he knows right from wrong and isn't a coward in uniform like
you were. I wouldn't be surprised if you gave your brother so much
misled lip in Vietnam that he didn't purposely walk into a bullet.

When you were in Sudan twice, how was the VP? Can't imagine why

else you would go there except maybe the sex with children angle.

Now you're contradicting your pal the denyer. There are hundreds of
terrorist training camps throughout The Sudan.

With all the countries in the world that harbor terroists, isn' it
ironic that we invaded the one with the most oil?

Old, useless argument. Show where we've taken any of it. All we're
doing is protecting it from terrorists who would want us not to have
it on the market. You are soooo misinformed and have the most closed
mind of the century.

No WMD's, no link

to Al Quida or 9-11. Most of the 9-11 terrorists came from Saudi
Arabia and we were actively fighting and winning in Afghanistan

(not

any more) so why Iraq??? Boggles the mind of a thinking person.

Yes, that would boggle the mind of a biased thinking person, and so
much so that that person would easily be turned into the veggie-mind
that you have. Misled is one opinion. Plain stupid is your second.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

#30

I'd like to see the proof too. It'll likely be more of an issue as
things get checked out--but don't expect to hear anything until it's
final. But in your favor, we probably won't know until someone uses it
here or against our troops in Iraq. Then and only then will you liberal
fools be stupified enough to ask the world for forgiveness for all your
bad-mouthing, doubting, and whining over the years. And then you
dufeses will be first in line to DEMAND we get GWB in there for a third
term.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

A little proof on Syria would be nice too. I mean beside some
retired, has been general you saw on Faux news.

#31

Your reply makes absolutely no sense. not even for you. Try
something original.
John
P.S. – Has anyone seen my Constitutional rights??

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

> I know right from left. I know truth from bullshit. You know
> ignorance is bliss.

You're a misled bitter and lonely soul who appears to be on the

verge

of hari-kari since you disagree with everything that's decent and
proper and you can't do a thing about it.

And we both know that revolutionaries were in
> militias and they did military active duty.

I know different. I have family members (by marriage) who's

ancestors

from that time period were asked to join the fight right from the
farms. Most were not in any type of military.

Explain to me how any
> foreign combatant fighting in Iraq is right??

What? Some sense? Foreigners who are fighting as insurgents are

ALL

wrong.

I hope we aren't
> soldiers of fortune, simple mercs. We no more belong in Iraq

than

we did in Nam. So, mac-sog boy dazzle us with your tales of OCONUS
> combat. You are getting boring here singer.

Not hard to figure you are a traiterous veteran. Vietnam did mess

the

minds of of many, and the rest of us have to accept people like

you

as casualties of that war. Wouldn't you really be better off

staring

at the Vietnam War Memorial in DC for 16 hours a day honoring your
fellow soldiers than to go thru whatever you're going thru right

now?

···
#32

Then let's try it this way. You're a candidate for suicide.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

Your reply makes absolutely no sense. not even for you. Try
something original.

#33

When I look south I'm looking toward Arizona. Sorry about your dick.
Wanna break your record and post some truth??
During Desert Storm Saddam couldn't even get a scud to Israel.
Doesn't seem a threat to me.
9-11 commission says Saddam hated Al-q and wouldn't deal with them
on any level. You're batting about 0 monkey-boy.
If I were president and got a report titled "Bin Laden Determined to
Strike inside USA" in August 2001. He's one intelligence gathering
fool, that w is. He could have prevented that one you fool.
W hasn't been clear about anything since he and his brother stole
the 2000 election.
About the torture, w admitted that we do it and I've seen the
pictures and so has everyone else.
I don't think I killed anyone in Nam that wasn't attacking us.
You suck singer and your rationale is bogus.
John
P.S. – Has anyone seen my Constitutional rights??

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

>
> First of all, Hey Dick!! What's up?

Are you talking to dicky the denyer....or that puny thing that

won't

dance anymore when you look to the south?

> Singer, do you have proof on that Sudan comment?? I doubt it.

Yes.

> Please explain to me how Saddam was any kind of threat to

America.

1. WMD's used in the past, and if he had them or could ever get

his

hands on them again he'd most likely sell to Al Q for use against

us.

Of course, that's the kind of preventative effort that critics

like

you need to see happen in the USA again before you finally wake

up.

And even then, all you'd say is "It's GWB's fault for not

protecting

us;Wawawawawawa......."

2. He supported terrorists. Palentinian and Al Q. GWB was clear

about

that. Of course your only argument is that he was such a good man
that he NEVER would have been in touch with Al Q. Again, the only

way

you'd ever learn your lesson is via the worst way--WMD going off

over

here or any major attack again like 9-11.

> What gives us the right to interfere with a regime that is no
threat
> to us and then authorize torture on it's citizens. We kill

Innocent

> Iraqi civilians on a daily basis over there. I can't see how you
> believe all the bullshit that you keep regurgating (look it up).

What you need is a dose of reality. Too bad you can't travel to

Iraq

and ask the people for yourself. My son tells me all the time of

how

the normal people come up to them and thank them in tears for all
they've done and sacraficed. The BS about torture you know is from
your partisan media with an agenda of sour grapes over the great
GWB's election wins. One or two bad apples doesn't stop the ship,

and

the Iraqui people understand that more than you or Kennedy or any
other fanatic peacenik in this country. Saddam being gone is FAR
better than him still being a grutal dictator. As leaders of the

free

···

world, it was our right and duty to dislodge him.
What is this about 'innocent civilians that bothes you? you didn't
kill them in Vietnam?? We didn't whack them in Japan? It's war you
fool.

#34

So there are terror camps in Sudan. That doesn't explain why you
were there. Did you train in one? Is that where you got your five
kills with a blade?? Or was it the sex with children thing?
You act as though you know me and I will say again: YOU ARE CLUELESS
ABOUT ME. You don't know a thing about me that I haven't told you.
You are a liar and a traitor and definately no PATRIOT.
Put that in your bong and smoke it or just shove it up your ass.
John
P.S. – Has anyone seen my Constitutional rights??

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

>
> You are the most critical bastard I have ever read.

It's very hard to tell you've ever DONE anything important---let
alone READ about it.

You pretend to
> be in the know, important, connected, but all your comments are
> moronic. Why are you bringing your son into your lies, is he

going

> to inherit "the family business" of lying?

Luckily, he knows right from wrong and isn't a coward in uniform

like

you were. I wouldn't be surprised if you gave your brother so much
misled lip in Vietnam that he didn't purposely walk into a bullet.

> When you were in Sudan twice, how was the VP? Can't imagine why
else you would go there except maybe the sex with children angle.

Now you're contradicting your pal the denyer. There are hundreds

of

terrorist training camps throughout The Sudan.

> With all the countries in the world that harbor terroists, isn'

it

> ironic that we invaded the one with the most oil?

Old, useless argument. Show where we've taken any of it. All we're
doing is protecting it from terrorists who would want us not to

have

it on the market. You are soooo misinformed and have the most

closed

mind of the century.

No WMD's, no link
> to Al Quida or 9-11. Most of the 9-11 terrorists came from Saudi
> Arabia and we were actively fighting and winning in Afghanistan
(not
> any more) so why Iraq??? Boggles the mind of a thinking person.

Yes, that would boggle the mind of a biased thinking person, and

so

much so that that person would easily be turned into the veggie-

mind

···

that you have. Misled is one opinion. Plain stupid is your second.

#35

You live in a dream world that is my nightmare. Not to worry,
Hillary will fix things after the 2008 election.
John
P.S. – Has anyone seen my Constitutional rights??

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

> A little proof on Syria would be nice too. I mean beside some
> retired, has been general you saw on Faux news.

I'd like to see the proof too. It'll likely be more of an issue as
things get checked out--but don't expect to hear anything until

it's

final. But in your favor, we probably won't know until someone

uses it

here or against our troops in Iraq. Then and only then will you

liberal

fools be stupified enough to ask the world for forgiveness for all

your

bad-mouthing, doubting, and whining over the years. And then you
dufeses will be first in line to DEMAND we get GWB in there for a

third

···

term.

#36

I'd pay real money to watch your suicide.
John
P.S. – Has anyone seen my Constitutional rights??

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

···

>
> Your reply makes absolutely no sense. not even for you. Try
> something original.

Then let's try it this way. You're a candidate for suicide.

#37

When I look south I'm looking toward Arizona. Sorry about your dick.
Wanna break your record and post some truth??

Even the letter 'A' in Arizona would break records for the dicks in
your family.

During Desert Storm Saddam couldn't even get a scud to Israel.
Doesn't seem a threat to me.

How about he sell a WMD to a terrorist and that guy comes over to the
US with it? Sound like a threat?

9-11 commission says Saddam hated Al-q and wouldn't deal with them

If I were president and got a report titled "Bin Laden Determined

to

Strike inside USA" in August 2001. He's one intelligence gathering
fool, that w is. He could have prevented that one you fool.
W hasn't been clear about anything since he and his brother stole
the 2000 election.

Such sour grapes, but I like it. Makes me wartm and fuzzy all over
just seeing you suffer that much more and for this long!

About the torture, w admitted that we do it and I've seen the
pictures and so has everyone else.

What if you learned torture saved an attack on this country--how
would you dance around that one while clinging to your ACLU-style
baloney?

I don't think I killed anyone in Nam that wasn't attacking us.
You suck singer and your rationale is bogus.

You don't think....you don't know....What the truth is is that your
BRAIN is fried. Maybe it'd been better if it were YOU who stepped out
in front of a bullet. Then you'd e spared the agony of not being able
to handle the truth.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

on any level. You're batting about 0 monkey-boy. That's what YOU want to believe because that's not what it says.

#38

So there are terror camps in Sudan. That doesn't explain why you
were there. Did you train in one? Is that where you got your five
kills with a blade?? Or was it the sex with children thing?

Yup. The Gov't. sent me in. One kill...and one capture--which I didn't
like but I was ordered to do. All the kids have aids.

You act as though you know me and I will say again: YOU ARE CLUELESS
ABOUT ME. You don't know a thing about me that I haven't told you.

You're an open book with a pathetic ending.

You are a liar and a traitor and definately no PATRIOT.
Put that in your bong and smoke it or just shove it up your ass.

What's the suicide date??

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

#39

Sorry, I don't understand your reply about the letter "A". Is this
Sesame Street?
How do you sneak a scud into America?? Plus I heard that weapons
storage facilities were ransacked by others before we bothered to
check on them when we invaded. Darn, oversight!!
I read the 9-11 report, that's what it said. Prove me wrong, if you
can.
I've seen pictures, you are fuzzy all over without my posts.
What if is not how I would begin a truthful statement. Your
stupidity is giving me a headache.
You are right, I don't know for sure. I bled for this country and
have been decorated. I deserve to be here and try to right wrongs.
And w is wrong.
John
P.S. – Has anyone seen my Constitutional rights??

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

> When I look south I'm looking toward Arizona. Sorry about your

dick.

> Wanna break your record and post some truth??

Even the letter 'A' in Arizona would break records for the dicks

in

your family.

> During Desert Storm Saddam couldn't even get a scud to Israel.
> Doesn't seem a threat to me.

How about he sell a WMD to a terrorist and that guy comes over to

the

US with it? Sound like a threat?

> 9-11 commission says Saddam hated Al-q and wouldn't deal with

them

> If I were president and got a report titled "Bin Laden

Determined

to
> Strike inside USA" in August 2001. He's one intelligence

gathering

> fool, that w is. He could have prevented that one you fool.
> W hasn't been clear about anything since he and his brother

stole

> the 2000 election.

Such sour grapes, but I like it. Makes me wartm and fuzzy all over
just seeing you suffer that much more and for this long!

> About the torture, w admitted that we do it and I've seen the
> pictures and so has everyone else.

What if you learned torture saved an attack on this country--how
would you dance around that one while clinging to your ACLU-style
baloney?

> I don't think I killed anyone in Nam that wasn't attacking us.
> You suck singer and your rationale is bogus.

You don't think....you don't know....What the truth is is that

your

BRAIN is fried. Maybe it'd been better if it were YOU who stepped

out

in front of a bullet. Then you'd e spared the agony of not being

able

···

> on any level. You're batting about 0 monkey-boy. > > That's what YOU want to believe because that's not what it says.
to handle the truth.

#40

OH MY GOD. Are you part of the ultra-secret Video Poker squadron??
You are pathetic. Professional gamblers aren't usually given
security clearances, and sent on black ops, especially if they are
drunks.
John
P.S. – Has anyone seen my Constitutional rights??

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

> So there are terror camps in Sudan. That doesn't explain why you
> were there. Did you train in one? Is that where you got your

five

> kills with a blade?? Or was it the sex with children thing?

Yup. The Gov't. sent me in. One kill...and one capture--which I

didn't

like but I was ordered to do. All the kids have aids.

> You act as though you know me and I will say again: YOU ARE

CLUELESS

> ABOUT ME. You don't know a thing about me that I haven't told

you.

···

You're an open book with a pathetic ending.

> You are a liar and a traitor and definately no PATRIOT.
> Put that in your bong and smoke it or just shove it up your ass.

What's the suicide date??