vpFREE2 Forums

[vpFREE] Royals of same suit consecutively?

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> LMAO. It appears the undenialable truth of Robbies' con is, once
> again, making him rethink his choice of debating me.

I kinda think when someone has no way out other than to use the

words

con and qed, it's not a debate any longer. You confirm that by your
constant altering of the thread name to build your confidence on-

the-

go. Entertaining, but defeatist.

Just thought I'd make it more relavent to the current state.

> > The real issue is on the other thread anyway because it
> > follows the Undeniable Truth's exposed path of guru-deception,
> > denial, hypocracy, and danger to players of all abilities.
>
> No, it's just more of your BS/con. I'll expose it exactly the

same

as I've exposed it here.

Exactly as I expect--you'll use those meaningless escape words once
you get stuck or confused--just as you've done here.

Just the facts, as usual.

> > You don't
> > like that I win with 95% negative EV play then deal with it
>
> Like I've said many times, I don't care what you've done, because
it makes no difference to anyone trying to determine the best
approach in the future.

Playing "Switch the question" again, are we? Yes you do care about
what "I've done" and it shows in every post.

Nope. Are you having that reading comprehension problem again?

I manipulate you like
the tooth fairy and you're so discombobulated it goes right through
the hole in your head.

Click your heels together 3 times and you'll feel much better.

> > You
> > don't like how the machines are ultimately programmed to

operate,

>
> I think they are programmed just fine. I have no need to invent
> illegal hot/cold cycles and illegal secondary programming to
further an obvious con.

Problem #1: Nerds are trained to think....

Doesn't sound like a problem to me.

only TO DO. Problem #2:
It's obvious you're uncomfortable - and constantly wondering - with
the programming otherwise you wouldn't be bringing it up so often
when it's all be said. I've known for a long time which of your
agitatation & irate buttons to push - and when.

LMAO. The babbling Brook is at it again. A little late don't you
think?

> > then worry about it and continue telling yourself it isn't

true.

I guarantee if I were to post it over on vpFREE - which I obviously
> can do whenever I choose - it would not only be the most

responded-

to post ever....it would be agreed to in principle by the majority

of

> respondants.
>
> No doubt it would get lots of responses pointing out the
illegality, just as I have done.

Is that a loophole or just another confirmation that you're

stumped?

Nope, just my opinion.

> > Yes, a handful of nerds and stuffy-head math geeks -
> > along with a few of the blinded followers who are simpleton
losers -would protest and cry foul becauase it would put them on

tilt

and they'd lose sleep for weeks at a time thinking about the
> ramifications to their formulas and math model baloney--but those
> are the breaks.

> Robbies' fantasy world continues.

> > Actually, I just got a 'tingle' thinking about their discomfort
over it!

> Why am I not surprised.

Because you know of the satisfying tingling I get here all the time
when I'm crowning you with the dunce cap.

No, because I can see you fantasizing that what you write would have
some kind of impact (other than belly laughs).

> > Imagine the scrambling around they'd be involved in. Why, it
might even turn out to be a blessing in disguise---they wouldn't be
able to eat for months!

> LMAO. Is this best you can do while sticking your tail between

your

> legs and admitting defeat?

I know....that was a difficult dig for you to come up with anything
clever to response with.

Quite easy "to tell it like it is" ... ROTFLMAO.

Still, don't hold back looking at those
vpfree luncheon pics. For all the sour 365 winter days up there in
Minn. there's got to be some laughable ones. These pictures will do
it. Then check out all the guru pics. Why, the only attractive/fit
one in the bunch is Deam Zamzow, and that's mainly because he lives
not 15 minutes from here!

I find it very humerous that Robbie has been reading every post on
VPree and looking at all the pictures. This jealousy of his pours out
of him in every post. It shows clearly what a frustrated failure he
has become.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > LMAO. It appears the undenialable truth of Robbies' con is,

once again, making him rethink his choice of debating me.

> I kinda think when someone has no way out other than to use the
words con and qed, it's not a debate any longer. You confirm that

by your constant altering of the thread name to build your confidence
on-the-go. Entertaining, but defeatist.

Just thought I'd make it more relavent to the current state.

> The real issue is on the other thread anyway because it follows
the Undeniable Truth's exposed path of guru-deception, denial,
hypocracy, and danger to players of all abilities.

> > No, it's just more of your BS/con. I'll expose it exactly the
same as I've exposed it here.
>
> Exactly as I expect--you'll use those meaningless escape words

once you get stuck or confused--just as you've done here.

Just the facts, as usual.
  
You don't like that I win with 95% negative EV play then deal withit

Like I've said many times, I don't care what you've done, because
> it makes no difference to anyone trying to determine the best
> approach in the future.

> Playing "Switch the question" again, are we? Yes you do care

about what "I've done" and it shows in every post.

Nope. Are you having that reading comprehension problem again?

No, I just said it shows in every one of your posts.

> I manipulate you like the tooth fairy and you're so

discombobulated it goes right through the hole in your head.

Click your heels together 3 times and you'll feel much better.

Don't need to. You're the easy target I've been looking for.
  

You don't like how the machines are ultimately programmed to
operate,

> > I think they are programmed just fine. I have no need to invent
> > illegal hot/cold cycles and illegal secondary programming to
> further an obvious con.
>
> Problem #1: Nerds aren't trained to think....

Doesn't sound like a problem to me.

> only TO DO. Problem #2: It's obvious you're uncomfortable - and

constantly wondering - with the programming otherwise you wouldn't be
bringing it up so often when it's all be said. I've known for a long
time which of your agitatation & irate buttons to push - and when.

LMAO. The babbling Brook is at it again. A little late don't you
think?

Never. It's never too late to push your agitation buttons and get the
obvious responses out of you. If it wasn't so much fun I'd be
finishing the installation of the blower on my new 6.1 Charger. But
this is so precious that I can't stop getting a thrill a minute
belittleng you!
  
> then worry about it and continue telling yourself it isn't

true. I guarantee if I were to post it over on vpFREE - which I

obviously can do whenever I choose - it would not only be the most

responded-to post ever....it would be agreed to in principle by the

majority of respondants.

> >
> > No doubt it would get lots of responses pointing out the
> illegality, just as I have done.

> Is that a loophole or just another confirmation that you're
stumped?

Nope, just my opinion.

> > > Yes, a handful of nerds and stuffy-head math geeks -
> > > along with a few of the blinded followers who are simpleton
> losers -would protest and cry foul becauase it would put them on
tilt and they'd lose sleep for weeks at a time thinking about the
> > ramifications to their formulas and math model baloney--but

those are the breaks.
  

> > Robbies' fantasy world continues.
>
> > > Actually, I just got a 'tingle' thinking about their

discomfort over it!
  

> > Why am I not surprised.

> Because you know of the satisfying tingling I get here all the

time when I'm crowning you with the dunce cap.

No, because I can see you fantasizing that what you write would

have some kind of impact (other than belly laughs).

Read it again....and then check your head.
  

> > > Imagine the scrambling around they'd be involved in. Why, it
> might even turn out to be a blessing in disguise---they wouldn't

be able to eat for months!

> > LMAO. Is this best you can do while sticking your tail between
your legs and admitting defeat?

> I know....that was a difficult dig for you to come up with

anything clever to response with.

Quite easy "to tell it like it is" ... ROTFLMAO.

I saw a question, so by definition you stepped in something you can't
wiggle out of.

> Still, don't hold back looking at those
> vpfree luncheon pics. For all the sour 365 winter days up there

in Minn. there's got to be some laughable ones. These pictures will
do it. Then check out all the guru pics. Why, the only attractive/fit

one in the bunch is Deam Zamzow, and that's mainly because he lives
not 15 minutes from here!

I find it very humerous that Robbie has been reading every post on
VPree and looking at all the pictures. This jealousy of his pours

out of him in every post. It shows clearly what a frustrated failure
he has become.

It would also be humorous if you knew who the Admin. is over there
now that Tom has said he no longer wants to do it!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > LMAO. It appears the undenialable truth of Robbies' con is,
once again, making him rethink his choice of debating me.

> > I kinda think when someone has no way out other than to use the
> words con and qed, it's not a debate any longer. You confirm that
by your constant altering of the thread name to build your

confidence

on-the-go. Entertaining, but defeatist.

> Just thought I'd make it more relavent to the current state.

The real issue is on the other thread anyway because it follows
the Undeniable Truth's exposed path of guru-deception, denial,
hypocracy, and danger to players of all abilities.

Oh, you mean the CON? It's in all of your posts.

Speaking of hypocracy, does anyone else see the constant hypocracy
out of little Robbie? For example, he claims to have friends who work
at the casinos he's plays at. Yet, these people breath the same air,
look at the same people, spend more time in the casino and earn a
little more or less than an APer.

> > > No, it's just more of your BS/con. I'll expose it exactly the
> same as I've exposed it here.
> >
> > Exactly as I expect--you'll use those meaningless escape words
once you get stuck or confused--just as you've done here.

> Just the facts, as usual.
  
>You don't like that I win with 95% negative EV play then deal

withit

> Like I've said many times, I don't care what you've done, because
> > it makes no difference to anyone trying to determine the best
> > approach in the future.

> > Playing "Switch the question" again, are we? Yes you do care
about what "I've done" and it shows in every post.
>
> Nope. Are you having that reading comprehension problem again?

No, I just said it shows in every one of your posts.

Sure it does. It must be that fantasy mind of yours working overtime
again. DO you even realize how you look when you NEED to fantasize
that someone cares about your results? Sick.

> > I manipulate you like the tooth fairy and you're so
discombobulated it goes right through the hole in your head.

> Click your heels together 3 times and you'll feel much better.

Don't need to. You're the easy target I've been looking for.

Looking? I've been here almost two years now. I suspect what we just
saw with your little misspeak was a little insight into what you
would like but can't have.

> You don't like how the machines are ultimately programmed to
> operate,

> > > I think they are programmed just fine. I have no need to

invent

> > > illegal hot/cold cycles and illegal secondary programming to
> > further an obvious con.
> >
> > Problem #1: Nerds aren't trained to think....

> Doesn't sound like a problem to me.

Correcting your won posts after the fact? Since everyone has already
seen it, this just makes you look even more foolish.

> > only TO DO. Problem #2: It's obvious you're uncomfortable - and
constantly wondering - with the programming otherwise you wouldn't

be

bringing it up so often when it's all be said. I've known for a

long

time which of your agitatation & irate buttons to push - and when.
>
> LMAO. The babbling Brook is at it again. A little late don't you
> think?

Never. It's never too late to push your agitation buttons and get

the

obvious responses out of you. If it wasn't so much fun I'd be
finishing the installation of the blower on my new 6.1 Charger. But
this is so precious that I can't stop getting a thrill a minute
belittleng you!

Of course. Is that why you're corecting your own posts that everyone
has already read? LMAO.

> then worry about it and continue telling yourself it isn't
> true. I guarantee if I were to post it over on vpFREE - which I
obviously can do whenever I choose - it would not only be the most
> responded-to post ever....it would be agreed to in principle by

the

majority of respondants.
> > >
> > > No doubt it would get lots of responses pointing out the
> > illegality, just as I have done.

> > Is that a loophole or just another confirmation that you're
> stumped?

> Nope, just my opinion.

> > > > Yes, a handful of nerds and stuffy-head math geeks -
> > > > along with a few of the blinded followers who are simpleton
> > losers -would protest and cry foul becauase it would put them

on

> tilt and they'd lose sleep for weeks at a time thinking about the
> > > ramifications to their formulas and math model baloney--but
those are the breaks.
  
> > > Robbies' fantasy world continues.
> >
> > > > Actually, I just got a 'tingle' thinking about their
discomfort over it!
  
> > > Why am I not surprised.

> > Because you know of the satisfying tingling I get here all the
time when I'm crowning you with the dunce cap.

> No, because I can see you fantasizing that what you write would
have some kind of impact (other than belly laughs).

Read it again....and then check your head.

(belly laugh)

> > > > Imagine the scrambling around they'd be involved in. Why,

it

> > might even turn out to be a blessing in disguise---they

wouldn't

be able to eat for months!

> > > LMAO. Is this best you can do while sticking your tail

between

> your legs and admitting defeat?

> > I know....that was a difficult dig for you to come up with
anything clever to response with.
>
> Quite easy "to tell it like it is" ... ROTFLMAO.

I saw a question, so by definition you stepped in something you

can't

wiggle out of.

Another nonsense response ... anyone surprised?

> > Still, don't hold back looking at those
> > vpfree luncheon pics. For all the sour 365 winter days up there
in Minn. there's got to be some laughable ones. These pictures will
do it. Then check out all the guru pics. Why, the only

attractive/fit

> one in the bunch is Deam Zamzow, and that's mainly because he

lives

>not 15 minutes from here!

> I find it very humerous that Robbie has been reading every post

on

> VPree and looking at all the pictures. This jealousy of his pours
out of him in every post. It shows clearly what a frustrated

failure

he has become.

It would also be humorous if you knew who the Admin. is over there
now that Tom has said he no longer wants to do it!

For once, something we agree on. However, I can see why he/she would
want to remain anonymous.

> The real issue is on the other thread anyway because it follows
> the Undeniable Truth's exposed path of guru-deception, denial,
> hypocracy, and danger to players of all abilities.

Oh, you mean the CON? It's in all of your posts.

Now I'm a guru? Is that from the left hand or the right?

Speaking of hypocracy, does anyone else see the constant hypocracy
out of little Robbie? For example, he claims to have friends who

work at the casinos he's plays at. Yet, these people breath the same
air, look at the same people, spend more time in the casino and earn
a little more or less than an APer.

I said they were 'contacts'. And who says I care about these people?
  

Sure it does. It must be that fantasy mind of yours working

overtime again. DO you even realize how you look when you NEED to
fantasize that someone cares about your results? Sick.

Guess what? The only one who REALLY cares about how I do is YOU!
  

> > > I manipulate you like the tooth fairy and you're so
> discombobulated it goes right through the hole in your head.
>
> > Click your heels together 3 times and you'll feel much better.
>
> Don't need to. You're the easy target I've been looking for.

Looking? I've been here almost two years now.

100% correct! And that's what I just said, only you're too moronic to
realize you've been getting thrashed and downsized since then.

> > > Problem #1: Nerds aren't trained to think....
>
> > Doesn't sound like a problem to me.

Correcting your won posts after the fact? Since everyone has

already seen it, this just makes you look even more foolish.

Yup. And since you can only relate to typis, I thought I'd whack you
good with it!

> > > only TO DO. Problem #2: It's obvious you're uncomfortable -

and constantly wondering - with the programming otherwise you
wouldn't be bringing it up so often when it's all be said. I've known
for a long time which of your agitatation & irate buttons to push -
and when.

> >
> > LMAO. The babbling Brook is at it again. A little late don't

you think?

>
> Never. It's never too late to push your agitation buttons and get
the
> obvious responses out of you. If it wasn't so much fun I'd be
> finishing the installation of the blower on my new 6.1 Charger.

But

> this is so precious that I can't stop getting a thrill a minute
> belittleng you!

Of course. Is that why you're corecting your own posts that

everyone has already read? LMAO.

At a loss for words....what a surprise.
   

> > then worry about it and continue telling yourself it isn't
> > true. I guarantee if I were to post it over on vpFREE - which I
> obviously can do whenever I choose - it would not only be the

most

> > responded-to post ever....it would be agreed to in principle by
the
> majority of respondants.
> > > >
> > > > No doubt it would get lots of responses pointing out the
> > > illegality, just as I have done.
>
> > > Is that a loophole or just another confirmation that you're
> > stumped?
>
> > Nope, just my opinion.
>
> > > > > Yes, a handful of nerds and stuffy-head math geeks -
> > > > > along with a few of the blinded followers who are

simpleton losers -would protest and cry foul becauase it would put
them on tilt and they'd lose sleep for weeks at a time thinking about
the ramifications to their formulas and math model baloney--but

> those are the breaks.
>
> > > > Robbies' fantasy world continues.
> > >
> > > > > Actually, I just got a 'tingle' thinking about their
> discomfort over it!
>
> > > > Why am I not surprised.
>
> > > Because you know of the satisfying tingling I get here all

the time when I'm crowning you with the dunce cap.

>
> > No, because I can see you fantasizing that what you write would
> have some kind of impact (other than belly laughs).
>
> Read it again....and then check your head.

(belly laugh)

I think you're getting it now!
   

> > > > > Imagine the scrambling around they'd be involved in. Why,
it might even turn out to be a blessing in disguise---they
wouldn't be able to eat for months!
>
> > > > LMAO. Is this best you can do while sticking your tail
between your legs and admitting defeat?
>
> > > I know....that was a difficult dig for you to come up with
> anything clever to response with.
> >
> > Quite easy "to tell it like it is" ... ROTFLMAO.
>
> I saw a question, so by definition you stepped in something you
can't wiggle out of.

Another nonsense response ... anyone surprised?

Nope. A compliment from you!
  

> > > Still, don't hold back looking at those
> > > vpfree luncheon pics. For all the sour 365 winter days up

there in Minn. there's got to be some laughable ones. These pictures
will do it. Then check out all the guru pics. Why, the only

attractive/fit one in the bunch is Deam Zamzow, and that's mainly

because he lives not 15 minutes from here!

> > I find it very humerous that Robbie has been reading every post
on VPree and looking at all the pictures. This jealousy of his

pours out of him in every post. It shows clearly what a frustrated

failure he has become.

> It would also be humorous if you knew who the Admin. is over

there now that Tom has said he no longer wants to do it!

For once, something we agree on. However, I can see why he/she

would want to remain anonymous.

I can't. but you're the fantasizer, not me.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > The real issue is on the other thread anyway because it follows
> > the Undeniable Truth's exposed path of guru-deception, denial,
> > hypocracy, and danger to players of all abilities.
>
> Oh, you mean the CON? It's in all of your posts.

Now I'm a guru?

No.

Is that from the left hand or the right?

Neither.

>
> Speaking of hypocracy, does anyone else see the constant

hypocracy

> out of little Robbie? For example, he claims to have friends who
work at the casinos he's plays at. Yet, these people breath the

same

air, look at the same people, spend more time in the casino and

earn

a little more or less than an APer.

I said they were 'contacts'. And who says I care about these

people?

It's pretty obvious you only care about yourself. However, the
hypocracy still shows through.

> Sure it does. It must be that fantasy mind of yours working
overtime again. DO you even realize how you look when you NEED to
fantasize that someone cares about your results? Sick.

Guess what? The only one who REALLY cares about how I do is YOU!

Da plane, da plane.

> > > > I manipulate you like the tooth fairy and you're so
> > discombobulated it goes right through the hole in your head.
> >
> > > Click your heels together 3 times and you'll feel much better.
> >
> > Don't need to. You're the easy target I've been looking for.
>
> Looking? I've been here almost two years now.

100% correct! And that's what I just said, only you're too moronic

to

realize you've been getting thrashed and downsized since then.

Da plane, da plane.

> > > > Problem #1: Nerds aren't trained to think....
> >
> > > Doesn't sound like a problem to me.
>
> Correcting your won posts after the fact? Since everyone has
already seen it, this just makes you look even more foolish.

Yup. And since you can only relate to typis, I thought I'd whack

you

good with it!

Doesn't effect me, only makes you look foolish.

> > > > only TO DO. Problem #2: It's obvious you're uncomfortable -
and constantly wondering - with the programming otherwise you
wouldn't be bringing it up so often when it's all be said. I've

known

for a long time which of your agitatation & irate buttons to push -
and when.
> > >
> > > LMAO. The babbling Brook is at it again. A little late don't
you think?
> >
> > Never. It's never too late to push your agitation buttons and

get

> the
> > obvious responses out of you. If it wasn't so much fun I'd be
> > finishing the installation of the blower on my new 6.1 Charger.
But
> > this is so precious that I can't stop getting a thrill a minute
> > belittleng you!
>
> Of course. Is that why you're corecting your own posts that
everyone has already read? LMAO.

At a loss for words....what a surprise.

No, 15 plus an acronym. If you haven't noticed I tend to let your
babbling speak for itself.

> > > > Still, don't hold back looking at those
> > > > vpfree luncheon pics. For all the sour 365 winter days up
there in Minn. there's got to be some laughable ones. These

pictures

will do it. Then check out all the guru pics. Why, the only
> attractive/fit one in the bunch is Deam Zamzow, and that's mainly
because he lives not 15 minutes from here!

> > > I find it very humerous that Robbie has been reading every

post

> on VPree and looking at all the pictures. This jealousy of his
pours out of him in every post. It shows clearly what a frustrated
> failure he has become.

> > It would also be humorous if you knew who the Admin. is over
there now that Tom has said he no longer wants to do it!

> For once, something we agree on. However, I can see why he/she
would want to remain anonymous.

I can't. but you're the fantasizer, not me.

Fits right in with the rest of your statements. You see, unless
you're perpetrating a con or a wannabee Bob, you really don't need
the exposure.

> >
> > Speaking of hypocracy, does anyone else see the constant
hypocracy
> > out of little Robbie? For example, he claims to have friends

who

> work at the casinos he's plays at. Yet, these people breath the
same
> air, look at the same people, spend more time in the casino and
earn
> a little more or less than an APer.
>
> I said they were 'contacts'. And who says I care about these
people?

It's pretty obvious you only care about yourself. However, the
hypocracy still shows through.

You're consistent at not answering direct questions. One more try:
Explain 'hypocracy' as it relates to 'friends'. Otherwise I'll accept
that you prefer looking silently stupid more than vocally dumb.
   

> > Sure it does. It must be that fantasy mind of yours working
> overtime again. DO you even realize how you look when you NEED to
> fantasize that someone cares about your results? Sick.
>
> Guess what? The only one who REALLY cares about how I do is YOU!

Da plane, da plane.

TATTOO!
  

> > > > > I manipulate you like the tooth fairy and you're so
> > > discombobulated it goes right through the hole in your head.
> > >
> > > > Click your heels together 3 times and you'll feel much

better.

> > >
> > > Don't need to. You're the easy target I've been looking for.
> >
> > Looking? I've been here almost two years now.
>
> 100% correct! And that's what I just said, only you're too

moronic to realize you've been getting thrashed and downsized since
then.

Da plane, da plane.

TATTOO!

> > > > > Problem #1: Nerds aren't trained to think....
> > >
> > > > Doesn't sound like a problem to me.
Doesn't effect me, only makes you look foolish.

Double denial. Just like a double negative!
  

Problem #2: It's obvious you're uncomfortable -
> and constantly wondering - with the programming otherwise you
> wouldn't be bringing it up so often when it's all be said. I've
known for a long time which of your agitatation & irate buttons to

push - and when.

> > > >
> > > > LMAO. The babbling Brook is at it again. A little late

don't you think?

> > >
> > > Never. It's never too late to push your agitation buttons and
get the obvious responses out of you. If it wasn't so much fun I'd

be finishing the installation of the blower on my new 6.1 Charger.
But this is so precious that I can't stop getting a thrill a minute

belittleng you!

> > Of course. Is that why you're corecting your own posts that
> everyone has already read? LMAO.

> At a loss for words....what a surprise.

No, 15 plus an acronym. If you haven't noticed I tend to let your
babbling speak for itself.

Hurts, doesn't it.

> > > > > Still, don't hold back looking at those
> > > > > vpfree luncheon pics. For all the sour 365 winter days up
> there in Minn. there's got to be some laughable ones. These
pictures
> will do it. Then check out all the guru pics. Why, the only
> > attractive/fit one in the bunch is Deam Zamzow, and that's

mainly because he lives not 15 minutes from here!

> > > > I find it very humerous that Robbie has been reading every
post on VPree and looking at all the pictures. This jealousy of his
> pours out of him in every post. It shows clearly what a

frustrated failure he has become.

>
> > > It would also be humorous if you knew who the Admin. is over
> there now that Tom has said he no longer wants to do it!
>
> > For once, something we agree on. However, I can see why he/she
> would want to remain anonymous.
>
> I can't. But you're the fantasizer, not me.

Fits right in with the rest of your statements. You see, unless
you're perpetrating a con or a wannabee Bob, you really don't need
the exposure.

You wanna translate that into English next time please?

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote: