vpFREE2 Forums

The Secret Behind vpFREE

#21

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > > > > So lets get this right. I 'opine', you call it
> an 'assertion',
> > I
> > > > > challenge you to prove your 'assertion', you come up with
> > > > definitions of the two words that show the only difference

as

> > being
> > > the degree of belief by the opiner or asserter--
> > >
> > > > Yup, that's called proof. Proof by definition.
> > >
> > > Correct....if your goal was to prove the definition of the
WORDS
> > you like to use.
> >
> > Yup. That was the goal. Did you forget the original question?

You

> > claimed what you constantly do wasn't assertions. I proved it
was. It's really very simple.
> >
> > > But that's why you're now trapped. For a moment, you get
> > > a reprieve...then you read below.
> >
> > Asserted lie.
>
> In a moment you're gonna be so ruffled that I'll have you start
> looking up every word here--just to give you a warm, fuzzy that

you can hide behind...but as we've seen that only lasts so long.....

RIV.

Confirmed!

>
> > > > > which does not answer my challenge
> > > > > at all because you 'opine' as to the degree of my belief

in

> > what I say--
> > > >
> > > > No, I simply go by the words that you use. If you can't
> properly
> > > use the English language, that is your problem.
>
> > > That would be fine too, except for the minor detail you HAD

to

> > leave out. You have no idea to what degree of being positive

any

of
> my statements are--
>
> > It's called communication skills. If you say something one way,
but
> > mean it another way ... that's YOUR problem. I can only go by

the

> > words you use.
>
> Now you're admitting to assuming what I meant.

I guess Rob must think that mind reading is a skill everyone

possess.

This is getting hilarious. He can't stop, even in the face of clear
and concise logic.

> Is that what they
> teach geeks? In other words, you're a guesser! Then you put
together
> a defense based on guessing and assuming things. Very good...for
3rd
> grade!

This truly is amazing. It appears Robbie really thinks this was a
good response. I guess that little tidbit about "communications
skills" slipped right by him.

Why, you even 'guessed' in this response! you're so rattled and
confused that you seem to be sticking both feet in the mouth at once!
Keep it up--I'm enjoying the show!!

> > > all you can do is guess and insert whichever word or
> > > set of words you feel is the right flavor.
> >
> > It has nothing to do with "guess"ing. It has everything to do
with
> > the words you use. I think most of us understand the English
> language well enough to see through this rather poor attempt to
save
> face.
>
> Try again. You just stubbed your toe on the truth as you spewed
your nonsense. Happens every time.

RIV. Your inner self can see exactly what is transpiring. You

really should go get help.

Oh I see what's transpiring allright---YOU are!

> > > All that 'proves' is
> > > you've chosen to guess because you don't know.
> >
> > Asserted lie.
> >
> > > I agree I'm usually
> > > right-on when it comes to belittling you and glorifying me as
> > > compared to you. Still, you have no real clue until I opine.
> >
> > RIV.
>
> Another compliment?

No, I haven't seen your inner voice heaping any compliments on you.
In fact, it portrays you as the village idiot.

???

> > > > > and now you 'assert' you've already 'asserted' a response
to
> > > > > my 'assertion'! If a batter could have 4 strikes, you'd

be

> the
> > > one.
> > > >
> > > > LMAO. Rob's embarrassment continues.
> > >
> > > That's it--the record! 5 STRIKES!!!!!
> >
> > RIV.
>
> RIP.

Yes, I can see why you'd call it a pest. Go get help.

???
  

> > > I just looked at your next 10 replies---all riv. Are you THAT
> > > defeated?
>
> > Have you stopped beating your wife?
> >
> > > You're not being any fun here any more!
> >
> > Just the facts, as usual. If you don't like the FACT that your
> rants are all directed at yourself, then that is a problem you

need

> to take up with professional help. Did you make that appointment
yet?
>
> That's odd. I directed my posts towards you. Who else is as

stupid as you to be so belittled and stomped on??

RIV. And he can't even see it. Did RIV mention the village idiot?

I have to admit you've lost me here.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

#22

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > > > > > So lets get this right. I 'opine', you call it

> > an 'assertion',
> > > I
> > > > > > challenge you to prove your 'assertion', you come up

with

> > > > > definitions of the two words that show the only

difference

as
> > > being
> > > > the degree of belief by the opiner or asserter--
> > > >
> > > > > Yup, that's called proof. Proof by definition.
> > > >
> > > > Correct....if your goal was to prove the definition of the
> WORDS
> > > you like to use.
> > >
> > > Yup. That was the goal. Did you forget the original question?
You
> > > claimed what you constantly do wasn't assertions. I proved it
> was. It's really very simple.
> > >
> > > > But that's why you're now trapped. For a moment, you get
> > > > a reprieve...then you read below.
> > >
> > > Asserted lie.
> >
> > In a moment you're gonna be so ruffled that I'll have you start
> > looking up every word here--just to give you a warm, fuzzy that
you can hide behind...but as we've seen that only lasts so long.....
>
> RIV.

Confirmed!

Lie.

>
> >
> > > > > > which does not answer my challenge
> > > > > > at all because you 'opine' as to the degree of my

belief

in
> > > what I say--
> > > > >
> > > > > No, I simply go by the words that you use. If you can't
> > properly
> > > > use the English language, that is your problem.
> >
> > > > That would be fine too, except for the minor detail you HAD
to
> > > leave out. You have no idea to what degree of being positive
any
> of
> > my statements are--
> >
> > > It's called communication skills. If you say something one

way,

> but
> > > mean it another way ... that's YOUR problem. I can only go by
the
> > > words you use.
> >
> > Now you're admitting to assuming what I meant.
>
> I guess Rob must think that mind reading is a skill everyone
possesses.
> This is getting hilarious. He can't stop, even in the face of

clear

> and concise logic.
>
> > Is that what they
> > teach geeks? In other words, you're a guesser! Then you put
> together
> > a defense based on guessing and assuming things. Very

good...for

> 3rd
> > grade!
>
> This truly is amazing. It appears Robbie really thinks this was a
> good response. I guess that little tidbit about "communications
> skills" slipped right by him.

Why, you even 'guessed' in this response!

I simply pointed out that interpreting what someone writes is
dependent upon the skill of the writer. If the writer has
good "communication skills", then it is no problem. No guessing is
required. However, when the writer claims the reader is guessing, he
is claiming that he possesses POOR communications skills. In other
words, so little Robbie can understand, he dissed himself.

you're so rattled and
confused that you seem to be sticking both feet in the mouth at

once!

Keep it up--I'm enjoying the show!!

Of course you are.

> > > > all you can do is guess and insert whichever word or
> > > > set of words you feel is the right flavor.
> > >
> > > It has nothing to do with "guess"ing. It has everything to do
> with
> > > the words you use. I think most of us understand the English
> > language well enough to see through this rather poor attempt to
> save
> > face.
> >
> > Try again. You just stubbed your toe on the truth as you spewed
> your nonsense. Happens every time.
>
> RIV. Your inner self can see exactly what is transpiring. You
really should go get help.

Oh I see what's transpiring allright---YOU are!

More illogic. Tell us again about how everyone has to "guess" at what
you write because you're such a poor communicator.

> > > > All that 'proves' is
> > > > you've chosen to guess because you don't know.
> > >
> > > Asserted lie.
> > >
> > > > I agree I'm usually
> > > > right-on when it comes to belittling you and glorifying me

as

> > > > compared to you. Still, you have no real clue until I opine.
> > >
> > > RIV.
> >
> > Another compliment?
>
> No, I haven't seen your inner voice heaping any compliments on

you.

> In fact, it portrays you as the village idiot.

???

Just add the clown face and you're real close.

> > > > > > and now you 'assert' you've already 'asserted' a

response

> to
> > > > > > my 'assertion'! If a batter could have 4 strikes, you'd
be
> > the
> > > > one.
> > > > >
> > > > > LMAO. Rob's embarrassment continues.
> > > >
> > > > That's it--the record! 5 STRIKES!!!!!
> > >
> > > RIV.
> >
> > RIP.
>
> Yes, I can see why you'd call it a pest. Go get help.

???

RIP.

> > > > I just looked at your next 10 replies---all riv. Are you

THAT

> > > > defeated?
> >
> > > Have you stopped beating your wife?
> > >
> > > > You're not being any fun here any more!
> > >
> > > Just the facts, as usual. If you don't like the FACT that

your

> > rants are all directed at yourself, then that is a problem you
need
> > to take up with professional help. Did you make that

appointment

> yet?
> >
> > That's odd. I directed my posts towards you. Who else is as
stupid as you to be so belittled and stomped on??

> RIV. And he can't even see it. Did RIV mention the village idiot?

I have to admit you've lost me here.

Nothing new. It's that old denial ... go get help.

#23

I'll let little dicky decipher all his one-word entries on this one,
CF. He must have had another bad day at the Indian casino....either
that, or his wife made him undress a Squaw instead of allowing him
to play video poker!

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
>> > > > > > > So lets get this right. I 'opine', you call it
> > > an 'assertion',
> > > > I
> > > > > > > challenge you to prove your 'assertion', you come up
with
> > > > > > definitions of the two words that show the only
difference
> as
> > > > being
> > > > > the degree of belief by the opiner or asserter--
> > > > >
> > > > > > Yup, that's called proof. Proof by definition.
> > > > >
> > > > > Correct....if your goal was to prove the definition of

the

> > WORDS
> > > > you like to use.
> > > >
> > > > Yup. That was the goal. Did you forget the original

question?

> You
> > > > claimed what you constantly do wasn't assertions. I proved

it

> > was. It's really very simple.
> > > >
> > > > > But that's why you're now trapped. For a moment, you get
> > > > > a reprieve...then you read below.
> > > >
> > > > Asserted lie.
> > >
> > > In a moment you're gonna be so ruffled that I'll have you

start

> > > looking up every word here--just to give you a warm, fuzzy

that

> you can hide behind...but as we've seen that only lasts so

long.....

> >
> > RIV.
>
> Confirmed!

Lie.

> >
> > >
> > > > > > > which does not answer my challenge
> > > > > > > at all because you 'opine' as to the degree of my
belief
> in
> > > > what I say--
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No, I simply go by the words that you use. If you

can't

> > > properly
> > > > > use the English language, that is your problem.
> > >
> > > > > That would be fine too, except for the minor detail you

HAD

> to
> > > > leave out. You have no idea to what degree of being

positive

> any
> > of
> > > my statements are--
> > >
> > > > It's called communication skills. If you say something one
way,
> > but
> > > > mean it another way ... that's YOUR problem. I can only go

by

> the
> > > > words you use.
> > >
> > > Now you're admitting to assuming what I meant.
> >
> > I guess Rob must think that mind reading is a skill everyone
> possesses.
> > This is getting hilarious. He can't stop, even in the face of
clear
> > and concise logic.
> >
> > > Is that what they
> > > teach geeks? In other words, you're a guesser! Then you put
> > together
> > > a defense based on guessing and assuming things. Very
good...for
> > 3rd
> > > grade!
> >
> > This truly is amazing. It appears Robbie really thinks this

was a

> > good response. I guess that little tidbit

about "communications

> > skills" slipped right by him.
>
> Why, you even 'guessed' in this response!

I simply pointed out that interpreting what someone writes is
dependent upon the skill of the writer. If the writer has
good "communication skills", then it is no problem. No guessing is
required. However, when the writer claims the reader is guessing,

he

is claiming that he possesses POOR communications skills. In other
words, so little Robbie can understand, he dissed himself.

> you're so rattled and
> confused that you seem to be sticking both feet in the mouth at
once!
> Keep it up--I'm enjoying the show!!

Of course you are.

>
> > > > > all you can do is guess and insert whichever word or
> > > > > set of words you feel is the right flavor.
> > > >
> > > > It has nothing to do with "guess"ing. It has everything to

do

> > with
> > > > the words you use. I think most of us understand the

English

> > > language well enough to see through this rather poor attempt

to

> > save
> > > face.
> > >
> > > Try again. You just stubbed your toe on the truth as you

spewed

> > your nonsense. Happens every time.
> >
> > RIV. Your inner self can see exactly what is transpiring. You
> really should go get help.
>
> Oh I see what's transpiring allright---YOU are!

More illogic. Tell us again about how everyone has to "guess" at

what

you write because you're such a poor communicator.

>
> > > > > All that 'proves' is
> > > > > you've chosen to guess because you don't know.
> > > >
> > > > Asserted lie.
> > > >
> > > > > I agree I'm usually
> > > > > right-on when it comes to belittling you and glorifying

me

as
> > > > > compared to you. Still, you have no real clue until I

opine.

> > > >
> > > > RIV.
> > >
> > > Another compliment?
> >
> > No, I haven't seen your inner voice heaping any compliments on
you.
> > In fact, it portrays you as the village idiot.
>
> ???

Just add the clown face and you're real close.

>
> > > > > > > and now you 'assert' you've already 'asserted' a
response
> > to
> > > > > > > my 'assertion'! If a batter could have 4 strikes,

you'd

> be
> > > the
> > > > > one.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > LMAO. Rob's embarrassment continues.
> > > > >
> > > > > That's it--the record! 5 STRIKES!!!!!
> > > >
> > > > RIV.
> > >
> > > RIP.
> >
> > Yes, I can see why you'd call it a pest. Go get help.
>
> ???

RIP.

>
> > > > > I just looked at your next 10 replies---all riv. Are you
THAT
> > > > > defeated?
> > >
> > > > Have you stopped beating your wife?
> > > >
> > > > > You're not being any fun here any more!
> > > >
> > > > Just the facts, as usual. If you don't like the FACT that
your
> > > rants are all directed at yourself, then that is a problem

you

> need
> > > to take up with professional help. Did you make that
appointment
> > yet?
> > >
> > > That's odd. I directed my posts towards you. Who else is as
> stupid as you to be so belittled and stomped on??
>
> > RIV. And he can't even see it. Did RIV mention the village

idiot?

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

>
> I have to admit you've lost me here.

Nothing new. It's that old denial ... go get help.

#24

It appears my statements about communications skills left Rob with no
reasonable reply. Not surprising. As usual, he spouts some BS and skips
responding ... which is just another admission of my superior use of
logic and the truth.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...> wrote:

I'll let little dicky decipher all his one-word entries on this one,
CF. He must have had another bad day at the Indian casino....either
that, or his wife made him undress a Squaw instead of allowing him
to play video poker!

#25

>
> I'll let little dicky decipher all his one-word entries on this

one,

> CF. He must have had another bad day at the Indian casino....either
> that, or his wife made him undress a Squaw instead of allowing him
> to play video poker!

It appears my statements about communications skills left Rob with no
reasonable reply. Not surprising. As usual, he spouts some BS and

skips

responding ... which is just another admission of my superior use of
logic and the truth.

C'mon, little dicky. We'd all have to be totally BLIND to see that
given the chance between popping the Squaw or sitting at the machines,
you'd pick the machines every time because you're a compulsive gambler
with no other interests remaining in your sorrowful life.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@> wrote:

#26

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@...>
wrote:

> > I'll let little dicky decipher all his one-word entries on this
one,
> > CF. He must have had another bad day at the Indian

casino....either

> > that, or his wife made him undress a Squaw instead of allowing

him

> > to play video poker!
>
> It appears my statements about communications skills left Rob

with no

> reasonable reply. Not surprising. As usual, he spouts some BS and
skips
> responding ... which is just another admission of my superior use

of

> logic and the truth.

C'mon, little dicky. We'd all have to be totally BLIND to see that
given the chance between popping the Squaw or sitting at the

machines,

you'd pick the machines every time

How is that cane working out? I hope the dog is better trained than
you and takes his dumps in private.

because you're a compulsive gambler
with no other interests remaining in your sorrowful life.

Hmmmm. I've been to a casino only 3 times in over a month. Sounds
like your buddy teacuplily plays almost every day. Do I detect a
little hypocracy in your statments.

Now that I've nailed Robbie in many, many lies he has taken to using
the potshot approach. Hurl an insult or two but stay away from any
prolonged discussion. Is that why you quit responding to this thread?

#27

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@>
wrote:
> > > I'll let little dicky decipher all his one-word entries on

this

> one,
> > > CF. He must have had another bad day at the Indian
casino....either
> > > that, or his wife made him undress a Squaw instead of

allowing

him
> > > to play video poker!
> >
> > It appears my statements about communications skills left Rob
with no
> > reasonable reply. Not surprising. As usual, he spouts some BS

and

> skips
> > responding ... which is just another admission of my superior

use

of
> > logic and the truth.
>
> C'mon, little dicky. We'd all have to be totally BLIND to see

that given the chance between popping the Squaw or sitting at the

machines, you'd pick the machines every time

How is that cane working out? I hope the dog is better trained than
you and takes his dumps in private.

Not a very good start to your day. Kind of weak, don'tcha think??

> because you're a compulsive gambler
> with no other interests remaining in your sorrowful life.

Hmmmm. I've been to a casino only 3 times in over a month. Sounds
like your buddy teacuplily plays almost every day. Do I detect a
little hypocracy in your statments.

Doesn't matter and you just can't minimalize your problem. You're
overly consumed with the game and you certainly know it, and you most
probably get your vp rocks off by being involved in these
discussions....never mind that you're constantly getting killed in
them!

Now that I've nailed Robbie in many, many lies he has taken to

using the potshot approach. Hurl an insult or two but stay away from
any prolonged discussion. Is that why you quit responding to this
thread?

HAHA! The genius gets rattled and lost again, thanks to my tutilage!
CF started this thread by belittleing your incapability of handling
long threads. You predictably immediately were offended and went on
the offensive as soon as I rightly pointed out your hiding behind
abrev's. and one-word meaningless answers because you just didn't
know how to respond! You get what you ask for in the real world,
little dicky. This ain't no math model!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote: