I do, but you obviously don't. When you state that the paradox is based
on something like your strategy, then you're stating they are
equivalent. So, you're stating YOUR strategy is based on two negative
expectations. I am still in perfect agreement with your statement.
Oh, and it's still quite clear that the paradox does not work for
casino games. Which is exactly true with your strategy. Again, I'm glad
we are in agreement.
···
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
> Since YOU indicated your strategy was BASED on this little paradox
> and it now is evident that the paradox does not apply to casino
> games, then I absolutely agree with you. It is now perfectly clear
> that your strategy CANNOT work.For someone who claims to be God's gift to science & math, you sure
make a lot of assumptions that turn out wrong. Too bad you missed out
on the humorous part of life. Here's what I said:
"You mean like when I play a negative expectation game and further
negatize it by making special plays. That's what that paradox is based
on. Cogno/Dick--you guys in super-tilt yet?"Do you get it yet? I've never heard of this thing until yesterday. Duh