--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "three2theroyal"
<three2theroyal@y...> wrote:
> That sounds like Dick when he can't come up with either clearly
> stated facts or effective responses that abound with common sense.If you check your previous posts, you will see that you are too
busy spouting party politics to come up with any facts. You make
statements and say that they can't be proven but believe you
because you are connected to the intelligence community. Sorry, homey
don't play that shit.
And it's very obvious why you neither want nor like the mention of
other players here who have helped Kerry get sent home where he
belongs. After all, it is THEY who taught you how to be
irresponsible, and it is THEY who set the pace and the trail for
Kerry's failure. Similar to the campaign, none of you liberals will
ever confirm they've heard facts because if they aren't what you want
to hear, it's impossible to be a fact.
> I hope you're right on the first one. The world only can take so
many Dicks. Secondly, the liberals I bring up are very similar in
beliefs to what you believe, and because they've virtually been
rendered useless hammering away on the same criticizms about the war
and Al Q. that you continue to support, a firm purpose IS served.
You don't know me or know my opinions. You certainly don't have any
right to throw me into a bin with all your perceived liberals.
I don't want to know you, but your opinions have been clearly laid
out.
> Third: Iraq had no connection with al queda, in fact they didn't
even share the same core principals. Saddam didn't want to share
his jihad with OBL or anyone else. The fact that he had no WMD's is
actually irrelevant.
>
> You are 100% wrong, I know better, and you asked what my sources
> were, I told you,You told me just to believe you cause you couldn't prove anything.
And just what are the facts you possess other than what you hear and
read?? I've been able to verify for myself that Dan Rather and John
Kerry, among others, are full of beans. What have you done of value
here to support your position?
What are conservative values? And what do conservatives know about
truth.
Values that are good for the country while retaining the deserved
respect for all. I'm a conservative, and I know the undeniable truth.
I can't speak for others.
You blindly follow a man who is an admitted cocaine user,
convicted drunk driver, deserter and liar. Bow down in his presence
or he might shit on your head.
So many sour grapes left over, my my my. But you should know by now
that such foolishness only warms my heart with joy to see a liberal
suffer in agony over the loss of the election--while RETAINING the
only right man for the job.
> I guess you actually believe all that nonsense, and the only way
to prove you wrong is if one goes off over here--which will
probably happen anyway because of the homos in the ACLU and all their
t-o-l-e-r-a-n-c-e- and d-i-v-e-r-s-i-t-y BS. The only positive to
come out of all that would be to see the look on yours, theirs, and
all the sissified actors and pop stars faces who become 'STUNNED'
that they were so screwed up not to listen to those whom they should
have listened to all along.
I am proud to say that I will never believe GWB or you. If
one "goes off over here" it will be your fault and your kings.
HaHaHa! What and who you believe is of no issue. 'Our fault' is
right....for allowing the queers and sissys disrupt this country
while terrorists sneak in with their ill-will.
> That's about as small an issue as their is to contemplate. But--
BIG surprise--I DID hear such baloney from the Kerry platform. Now
do you see why I bring up others???
No I don't. But I figure it's because you like to hear yourself
talk. You make no sense whatsoever. Again and again. Kerry is no
longer part of the equation.
Thank God for THAT! But he did leave a lot of wounded who just can't
accept the righteous path America has chosen to take.
> More of 'whom' than us? Terrorists?
No, asshole, combatants.
Just like Dick, you're extremely unclear. And just like Dick, you
rile very easily.
Boy, you sure are an accomplished name dropper. I'm beginning to
wonder if you actually have an original thought in that balding
head of yours.
Are you on the same page here? Get over your irritability and work
out your disgust. You began on a weak note and are now near bottom.
Just where I like to see liberals squirm.
> Hello in there?! We've already WON!!!
Still cleaning up after a year and a half. We must be pretty good.
If you consider this winning than there is little or no hope for
you.
Seems like you don't want to accept victory--and you even want us to
lose whatever you figure we haven't won. In the college dorm we lit
up farts to see how far we could shoot the flames. THAT made more
sense than what you just blabbered.
So these elections that you speak of, they will be electing non-
muslims to rule their country. Give it up Rob, you don't have a
clue.
Who said that besides you? I have no idea, nor do I care who they'll
elect. It's their country. Conservatives value that concept. Liberals
still can't get over their whopping defeat across the board in this
country, so you will continue to criticize whatever comes out of it
all.
Again, a democracy has never existed in the middle east and I don't
think they have the infrstructure to have one. I presume that a
religious leader will be elected. That's only if the elections are
honest and not fixed by your people.
I can hear your relatives saying the same thing about Japan and
Germany in the past. Now you've got a new country to pick on. Why not
get over all the hate and try to work with our Gov't. in any way
possible in order to make it happen for the Iraqis. And I'd have zero
problem with any US fix in the election. Fixes don't happen wothout
the knowledge of all the proper people.
> That's such a crybaby, cowardly, and surrender attitude. You
should be ashamed. Imagine if our ancestors felt that way in the
> Revolutionary War,Actually, that's pretty much what happened during the revolutionary
war. Thank god that France was there to save our asses with money,
food, military advisors and weapons.
Whatever happened then hasn't a thing to do with the fact that our
people were not the cowards, queers, and sissys that you, Michael
Moore, and your few followers are today.
>where if we had CNN back then, all we would hear
> is how the British outnumber us 10-1 and have far more useable
> weapons than our ragtag militia. In Iraq we're fighting for themBecause so many of them fought for us?!?!?
I didn't know we required something from others in order to give and
do the right thing. Maybe that's why Kerry failed??
I think he would have been happier to set one off in Jerusalem. But
he couldn't deliver there either. Best I can tell, he didn't even
have any.
Best you can tell....from the NY Times.
>You, as a bleeding pacifist,
Not, I served, actively and hey, in wartime. Well, police action
time anyway. Wanna see my medals??
So didn't your hero Kerry. And he has medals that he didn't really
deserve.
> would rather sit back, hope it doesn't happen, beg the enemy
> to 'please don't do it', and offer to have Muslims over for tea
and cookies, than to go after them over there BEFORE they have the
> opportunity to get us over here.They have gotten us over here, you might have heard about, it's
being called 9/11 and was in all the papers. I heard that we were
going to bring those responsible to justice. But I guess the prez
had more important thing to do with our armed forces for awhile
before that. Something of a personal nature.
Trying to discuss anything with you is like trying to explain
quadratic equation to my dog. He looks interested but he just
doesn't get it.
Um, you must be sore because we haven't brought ALL OBL's people to
justice yet, but don't fret, because many have been. Where did you
hear it would be easy and fast? Oh yes, the NY Times again. Or maybe
Dan Rather or our honorary Secretary of State, Sean Penn!
Your the type that would talk to a dog, because you're a bit off the
intelligence quotient on a forum.