vpFREE2 Forums

Kerryisms

#21

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> > Nope. Why waste time with Pee Wee Herman-like responses? Self-
> denial becomes a disease after a while.
>
> I see you're getting really frustrated. I sense you are getting
ready to run away and hide once again.

Same old Dick. Lost and wandering.

Same old Rob. Avoiding the truth whenever possible. You know, the
truth that proves your scam system can never turn a negative
expectation game positive.

> > Fact is, you don't see the US doing what YOU propose, and

you're

> > whining about it all the time because that's all you and your

cry-

> > baby liberal friends can do about it.

> Sorry, moron, but I'm not now, nor have I ever been a liberal.

It's

> you that chooses to group EVERYONE who disagrees with your
>political beliefs into one camp. The world is lot more complicated
>than that.

And that's the typical liberal response. First, denial....unless

they

need to be one for a certain answer of course. Then, waffling.

People

like you depend on the art of confusion, only with me, because I'm
much smarter than you, it doesn't work. So you make believe you're
not a liberal when you are. So tell me, are you really a hippie,
freak, queer, or just plain WHACKO!

Once again, you revert to monkey boy bravado when you have nothing
intelligent to say. However, I agree that facts rarely "work" with
you.

> > That simply means we kill more of them, and sooner or later
> > they'd have been terrorists anyway.
>
> Sure they would. Do you even have any idea how stupid your
statement is?

That's supposed to mean something??

Yep. Exactly what I wrote. Clearly, you have no idea just how stupid
your statements are.

> It didn't take very long for your racist views to appear once
>again. You have no idea what goes on "OVER THERE".

Been there twice since 9-11. It's a racist/religious war regardless
what the media says and what you want to believe. Of course what
would you know, one who sits back and watches as the world goes by,
analyzing the statistics after-the-fact.

You mean we attacked Iraq out of racist/religious beliefs? I wouldn't
have gone that far.

> > That's how I can tell you have a low I.Q., if any at all. You
> > regularly say "the one or two people who read this forum blah
blah
> > blah". Now it's "everyone". You're in the waffle house again.

Yet

> > what you're really doing is discussing this with me, so why

worry

> > about anyone else?
>
> Others come along and read this forum for a SHORT time and see

what

a baffoon you are and stop reading it. Good enough for me.

You and your make-believe, theoretical world..... Such a simple

life

after a useless career. No wonder you have such low standards.

More monkey boy bravado, more useless words. Are you now claiming the
rules of addition are somehow suspended in the real world? And, only
valid in some "make-believe" world.

>
> > Not such an easy way out, was it........
>
> Yes, it was.

A way out? An escape? OK.

A simple statement of fact.

#22

> Same old Dick. Lost and wandering.

Same old Rob. Avoiding the truth whenever possible. You know, the
truth that proves your scam system can never turn a negative
expectation game positive.

On and on, simply because that self-proclaimed superior intellect has
no way to figure it out. That's gotta be driving you crazy!
     

Once again, you revert to monkey boy bravado when you have nothing
intelligent to say. However, I agree that facts rarely "work" with
you.

I guess the truth really does hurt you.
   

> Been there twice since 9-11. It's a racist/religious war

regardless what the media says and what you want to believe. Of
course what would you know, one who sits back and watches as the
world goes by, analyzing the statistics after-the-fact.

You mean we attacked Iraq out of racist/religious beliefs? I

wouldn't have gone that far.

That's a spin. Beliefs have nothing to do with it for the US. We
fight terrorism and terrorists and the countrys that support that
stuff. they made it a racist/religious war for themselves. Duh.
       

> after a useless career. No wonder you have such low standards.

More monkey boy bravado, more useless words. Are you now claiming

the rules of addition are somehow suspended in the real world? And,
only valid in some "make-believe" world.

That's your gobbledegook, not mine. Figure it out and get back to me.

> A way out? An escape? OK.

A simple statement of fact.

But you can't escape me!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#23

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> > Same old Dick. Lost and wandering.
>
> Same old Rob. Avoiding the truth whenever possible. You know, the
> truth that proves your scam system can never turn a negative
> expectation game positive.

On and on, simply because that self-proclaimed superior intellect

has

no way to figure it out. That's gotta be driving you crazy!

As usual you have it backwards. I've never claimed to be a "superior
intellect", in fact, I claim the math is very simple and just about
anyone can understand it with a modest amount of effort.

> Once again, you revert to monkey boy bravado when you have

nothing

> intelligent to say. However, I agree that facts rarely "work"

with

> you.

I guess the truth really does hurt you.

So far, all that's come from you is a pack of lies.

> > Been there twice since 9-11. It's a racist/religious war
regardless what the media says and what you want to believe. Of
course what would you know, one who sits back and watches as the
world goes by, analyzing the statistics after-the-fact.
>
> You mean we attacked Iraq out of racist/religious beliefs? I
wouldn't have gone that far.

That's a spin. Beliefs have nothing to do with it for the US. We
fight terrorism and terrorists and the countrys that support that
stuff. they made it a racist/religious war for themselves. Duh.

The proverbial "they". Could you be a little LESS specific? I don't
think so.

In any event, the terrorist leaders are clearly using religion to
further their agenda. Not unlike Christians of the last millenium.

> > A way out? An escape? OK.

> A simple statement of fact.

But you can't escape me!

Is that like a disease? Maybe, a rash that won't go away. Maybe I
should start calling you herpes ...

#24

As usual you have it backwards. I've never claimed to be
a "superior intellect", in fact, I claim the math is very simple and
just about anyone can understand it with a modest amount of effort.

You can't and don't post a word on these forums if you didn't think
it was an eye-opening theorum from God's gift to video poker. Yes,
the math is elementary. It's the make believe application to a casino
game played by a human being that's the joke.
          

> That's a spin. Beliefs have nothing to do with it for the US. We
> fight terrorism and terrorists and the countrys that support that
> stuff. they made it a racist/religious war for themselves. Duh.

The proverbial "they". Could you be a little LESS specific? I don't
think so.

Think back to English 101, or better yet, get a private lesson from
the Queen when you visit your home away from home for addicts again.
Look at the sentence and figure out who 'they' are.

In any event, the terrorist leaders are clearly using religion to
further their agenda. Not unlike Christians of the last millenium.

And that's why we should wipe every last one of them out. The world
has passed these barbarians by, only they can't accept that. Nuke 'em!

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#25

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> As usual you have it backwards. I've never claimed to be
>a "superior intellect", in fact, I claim the math is very simple

and

>just about anyone can understand it with a modest amount of effort.

You can't and don't post a word on these forums if you didn't think
it was an eye-opening theorum from God's gift to video poker.

Lie. I've often posted with locations of good machines.
What "theorum" would that entail?

Yes,
the math is elementary. It's the make believe application to a

casino

game played by a human being that's the joke.

How can it be "make believe" when it's simple addition? Are you
saying the computers in VP machines use some other mathematical
system? Your idiotic replies simply increase the size of that big
hole you've been digging. It's PRECISELY the definition of the VP
game that allows for the the application of statistical methods. If
VP wasn't random, if the hands were not independent, if secondary
programming was allowed, then .... we wouldn't care. We'd find
something else to do.
  

> > That's a spin. Beliefs have nothing to do with it for the US.

We

> > fight terrorism and terrorists and the countrys that support

that

> > stuff. they made it a racist/religious war for themselves. Duh.
>
> The proverbial "they". Could you be a little LESS specific? I

don't

> think so.

Think back to English 101, or better yet, get a private lesson from
the Queen when you visit your home away from home for addicts

again.

Look at the sentence and figure out who 'they' are.

How can I? It's completely ambiguous. However, let's assume like I
did further in my reply that you meant terrorist leaders.

> In any event, the terrorist leaders are clearly using religion to
> further their agenda. Not unlike Christians of the last millenium.

And that's why we should wipe every last one of them out. The world
has passed these barbarians by, only they can't accept that.

Nuke 'em!

How do you nuke the terrorist leaders without killing all the
innocents? I know you don't care. In your world all Muslims are
guilty by generalization.

#26

> You can't and don't post a word on these forums if you didn't

think it was an eye-opening theorum from God's gift to video poker.

Lie. I've often posted with locations of good machines.
What "theorum" would that entail?

You know what I mean.
What's a 'good machine'? One that's ready to pay off?

How can it be "make believe" when it's simple addition?

Simple addition has zero to do with playing video poker. You geeks
have made something out of a simple game that it isn't.

Are you

saying the computers in VP machines use some other mathematical
system? Your idiotic replies simply increase the size of that big
hole you've been digging. It's PRECISELY the definition of the VP
game that allows for the the application of statistical methods. If
VP wasn't random, if the hands were not independent, if secondary
programming was allowed, then .... we wouldn't care. We'd find
something else to do.

Ramble on all you want. All that nonense that infatuates you means
nothing to real players. If it happens it happens. If you give it the
best opportunity to happen, you've followed the intelligent way to
play the game. And if you make a classroom out of the statistics
after-the-fact, then you're more interested in analyzing results.
RESULTS are the only thing that matters. Not percentages, not
probability theories, not math models. RESULTS.
              

How can I? It's completely ambiguous. However, let's assume like I
did further in my reply that you meant terrorist leaders.

Good for you!
  

How do you nuke the terrorist leaders without killing all the
innocents? I know you don't care. In your world all Muslims are
guilty by generalization.

You have the chance to save an American city of 2 million.
Intelligence reports clearly inform that a nuclear weapon is
somewhere in the city, but it hasn't been found. There are 1000
Muslims in a building, and one of them has sent out a message from
inside to the Governor saying he will set off that nuclear weapon
within the next 10 days, presumably just because he is a religious
fanatic. In one scenario, RS orders the destruction of the building
and all who are in it. In the other, RG waffles and falters, finally
deciding to ask for a meeting with the Muslim barbarian to see if he
can talk some of that famous nerd-sense into the guy. He of course
cannot because the Muslim idiots believe they're doing Allah's deed
and will get laid by 79 virgins in Muslim Heaven. Smart people have
understood that for years. Liberals and anti-kill anything freaks
don't believe it. So in 6 days the weapon goes off, obliterating the
city and its 2 million innocents. Guess who did the right thing. It
will happen sooner or later.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#27

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> > You can't and don't post a word on these forums if you didn't
think it was an eye-opening theorum from God's gift to video poker.

> Lie. I've often posted with locations of good machines.
> What "theorum" would that entail?

You know what I mean.
What's a 'good machine'? One that's ready to pay off?

A machine with a good paytable. Usually, a specific type of machine
if someone asks specifically. In any event, my answer proved you were
lying once again.

> How can it be "make believe" when it's simple addition?

Simple addition has zero to do with playing video poker. You geeks
have made something out of a simple game that it isn't.

How would you ever know how many credits you have without addition?
How would you have any idea if the payback was without addition (it
could be 80%)? etc., etc.

In other words, you use addition all the time. Which, of course,
makes your statement a lie.

Are you
> saying the computers in VP machines use some other mathematical
> system? Your idiotic replies simply increase the size of that big
> hole you've been digging. It's PRECISELY the definition of the VP
> game that allows for the the application of statistical methods.

If

> VP wasn't random, if the hands were not independent, if secondary
> programming was allowed, then .... we wouldn't care. We'd find
> something else to do.

Ramble on all you want. All that nonense that infatuates you means
nothing to real players.

So, what? That makes everyone else non-"real"? LMAO

If it happens it happens. If you give it the
best opportunity to happen, you've followed the intelligent way to
play the game.

By the grace of the gambling gods? Is that the best you can come up
with?

And if you make a classroom out of the statistics
after-the-fact, then you're more interested in analyzing results.
RESULTS are the only thing that matters. Not percentages, not
probability theories, not math models. RESULTS.

That's the reason to use statistics. To find the best way to
get "RESULTS". Seems a tad bit better then praying to the gambling
gods.
   

> How do you nuke the terrorist leaders without killing all the
> innocents? I know you don't care. In your world all Muslims are
> guilty by generalization.

You have the chance to save an American city of 2 million.
Intelligence reports clearly inform that a nuclear weapon is
somewhere in the city, but it hasn't been found. There are 1000
Muslims in a building, and one of them has sent out a message from
inside to the Governor saying he will set off that nuclear weapon
within the next 10 days, presumably just because he is a religious
fanatic. In one scenario, RS orders the destruction of the building
and all who are in it. In the other, RG waffles and falters,

finally

deciding to ask for a meeting with the Muslim barbarian to see if

he

can talk some of that famous nerd-sense into the guy.

Nope, wouldn't happen. Personally, I'd try to infiltrate the
building, find the terrorists, capture them and use whatever means
necessary to find out where the bomb was located. Destroying the
building buys you nothing because you have no idea where the bomb is
located.

He of course
cannot because the Muslim idiots believe they're doing Allah's deed
and will get laid by 79 virgins in Muslim Heaven.

In the RS world the nuclear bomb goes off without any opportunity to
stop it.

Smart people have
understood that for years.

Understand what? You have to make a point somewhere don't you?

Liberals and anti-kill anything freaks
don't believe it. So in 6 days the weapon goes off, obliterating

the

city and its 2 million innocents. Guess who did the right thing. It
will happen sooner or later.

Sorry, destroying the building in your scenario did nothing to stop
the nuclear bomb from going off. Do you think they'd have it right
there with them making it an easy target? Do you think they'd be as
stupid are you are? I guess so.

Now, what does this have to do with nukeing Muslim cities?

#28

> You know what I mean.
> What's a 'good machine'? One that's ready to pay off?

A machine with a good paytable. Usually, a specific type of machine
if someone asks specifically. In any event, my answer proved you

were lying once again.

Your answer proved only that you're affected by neurosis. Good pay
tables mean nothing if the machine doesn't hit. A good machine is one
that wins, and nothing less.

How would you ever know how many credits you have without addition?

The machine tells you. Let IT do the work and forget about the math.
That's why you don't even enjoy playing the game. You are anal about
every statistical detail.
  

So, what? That makes everyone else non-"real"? LMAO

So it means you're absolutely anal-retentive about video poker and
what it means. Exactly why I'm 100% correct when I say it has
overtaken anything and everything in your life.

That's the reason to use statistics. To find the best way to
get "RESULTS". Seems a tad bit better then praying to the gambling
gods.

Your statistics mean nothing when the machine is being played. All of
your analysis means nothing after-the-fact except it for some reason
excites nerds with numbers crunching just to see what happened.
    

Nope, wouldn't happen. Personally, I'd try to infiltrate the
building, find the terrorists, capture them and use whatever means
necessary to find out where the bomb was located. Destroying the
building buys you nothing because you have no idea where the bomb
is located.

And if your efforts fail? If the bomb requires the animal to set it
off on-site? That's more realistic. You'd have no choice but to kill
1 radical and 99 innocents. But you wouldn't do it because you'd
falter and 2 million Americansd would perish.

In the RS world the nuclear bomb goes off without any opportunity

to stop it.

Why change the scenario? Why waffle? Never a straight answer.

> Liberals and anti-kill anything freaks
> don't believe it. So in 6 days the weapon goes off, obliterating
the city and its 2 million innocents. Guess who did the right

thing. It will happen sooner or later.

Sorry, destroying the building in your scenario did nothing to stop
the nuclear bomb from going off. Do you think they'd have it right
there with them making it an easy target? Do you think they'd be as
stupid are you are? I guess so.

Hello McFly?? The bomb was off-site and all the people were let go by
YOU hours after you were afraid to kill them all! The radical then
went to the site and detonated the bomb. Hello!!

Now, what does this have to do with nukeing Muslim cities?

It proves you'd wimp out and would prefer to let people in this
country die before you'd kill 'innocent' Muslims. It proves you'd
never destroy a foreign Muslim city to rid it of potential terrorists
who'd be a nuclear threat to the US. Just what John Kerry would do.
Congratulations.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#29

<<Good pay
tables mean nothing if the machine doesn't hit. A good machine is one
that wins, and nothing less.>>

This is possibly the stupidest thing you've ever said.

How would you ever know how many credits you have without addition?

<<The machine tells you. Let IT do the work and forget about the math. >>

Lie. Your system involves frequent cashouts, which must be added to make
decisions later on in the system. Now I'm wondering if you've ever actually
played your system or if the entire thing is a fabrication.

Cogno

#30

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> > You know what I mean.
> > What's a 'good machine'? One that's ready to pay off?
>
> A machine with a good paytable. Usually, a specific type of

machine

> if someone asks specifically. In any event, my answer proved you
were lying once again.

Your answer proved only that you're affected by neurosis. Good pay
tables mean nothing if the machine doesn't hit. A good machine is

one

that wins, and nothing less.

I've been on machines that have paid one time and not another. By
your definition I guess this would be goodbad machine. If only you
knew how ridiculous your statements have become.

> How would you ever know how many credits you have without

addition?

The machine tells you. Let IT do the work and forget about the

math.

That's why you don't even enjoy playing the game. You are anal

about

every statistical detail.

And just what operation inside the machine do you think is being used
ot ADD up the credits? ADDITION, that horrible little word that
proves you are a liar and fraud.

> So, what? That makes everyone else non-"real"? LMAO

So it means you're absolutely anal-retentive about video poker and
what it means. Exactly why I'm 100% correct when I say it has
overtaken anything and everything in your life.

Typical monkey boy response. Beat your chest and say nothing.

> That's the reason to use statistics. To find the best way to
> get "RESULTS". Seems a tad bit better then praying to the

gambling

> gods.

Your statistics mean nothing when the machine is being played. All

of

your analysis means nothing after-the-fact except it for some

reason

excites nerds with numbers crunching just to see what happened.

More monkey boy bravado. Do you have anything to say WHATSOEVER? No.
Why? Because I've already shown your system to be worthless with that
simple little addition operation, and you to be a liar and fraud.

> Nope, wouldn't happen. Personally, I'd try to infiltrate the
> building, find the terrorists, capture them and use whatever

means

> necessary to find out where the bomb was located. Destroying the
> building buys you nothing because you have no idea where the bomb
>is located.

And if your efforts fail? If the bomb requires the animal to set it
off on-site? That's more realistic.

Nope. More likely the bomb is set on a timer or has someone right
there with it.

> In the RS world the nuclear bomb goes off without any opportunity
to stop it.

Why change the scenario? Why waffle? Never a straight answer.

I used your scenario ECACTLY. You stated the location of the bomb
was "unknown". It now appears you're tying to change your own
scenario and "waffle" around.

> > Liberals and anti-kill anything freaks
> > don't believe it. So in 6 days the weapon goes off,

obliterating

> the city and its 2 million innocents. Guess who did the right
thing. It will happen sooner or later.
>
> Sorry, destroying the building in your scenario did nothing to

stop

> the nuclear bomb from going off. Do you think they'd have it

right

> there with them making it an easy target? Do you think they'd be

as

> stupid are you are? I guess so.

Hello McFly?? The bomb was off-site and all the people were let go

by

YOU hours after you were afraid to kill them all! The radical then
went to the site and detonated the bomb. Hello!!

Where did I say I would let anyone go. In fact, I said "capture".
This of course makes you, once again, a liar. How many times has that
been now? A 100 in the last month alone?

> Now, what does this have to do with nukeing Muslim cities?

It proves you'd wimp out and would prefer to let people in this
country die before you'd kill 'innocent' Muslims.

If only it were that easy. One situation is but a drop in the bucket
and "proves" nothing, except how small your mind has become.

It proves you'd
never destroy a foreign Muslim city to rid it of potential

terrorists

who'd be a nuclear threat to the US. Just what John Kerry would do.
Congratulations.

Thank you. One problem. I don't think your hero, George W. Bush,
would do it either (hasn't yet). I guess means you're calling the
president a "wimp" also. Now, if I could get all you racists in one
building ...

#31

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

I've been on machines that have paid one time and not another. By
your definition I guess this would be goodbad machine. If only you
knew how ridiculous your statements have become.

That's what I call pure brilliance. It wins today, it's a good
machine. It loses tomorrow it's a bad machine. vp machines are only
as good or bad as they do for you TODAY. No theories. No baloney.
Just the facts.

Nope. More likely the bomb is set on a timer or has someone right
there with it.

No waffling the issues with me! I've cleared the mess you wrote to
give it to he-who-cannot-comprehend again. 1000 Muslim scum in a
building. One is a terrorist who's brought a nuclear bomb into the US
and warns in advance, so we will sweat, that he will set it off
withing the next 10 days. It is off-site (do you know what that
means)? A radioactivity scan/check of the building confirms that. It
could be on a timer. Doesn't matter. The animal has to be identified
and eliminated just in case he needs to be there to detonate it (ever
hear of suicide bombers?).

RS IMMEDIATELY destroys the building, the terrorist, and 999
innocents. No loss to the civilized world. Threat reduced but not
eliminated. Reduced is the best we could do since there was no time
to investigate to find out who he was so we could torture him for
answers. A massive search entails and the bomb is located 8 days
later. Well-known among those familiar with suitcase nuclear weapons,
it requires hands-on detonation. Hope for the best that there's no
more. Lessons learned for the Muslim terrorists around the world: Pre-
emption is the policy, and you will lose.

RG on the other hand, shows typical liberal/peacenik weakness and
waffling. He begs the 1000 people to produce the terrorist so he can
have a 'reasonable discussion' with him. But of course, no one knows
who it is. So Dick, being the humanitarian that he is, lets everyone
go. 6 days later a massive explosion occurs and over 2 million people
die. All because he didn't want to kill 1000 people. When the dust
settles he posthumously receives a heroism award from the ACLU for
not violating the Muslim's rights. Sean Penn attends. So does pervert
Rosie O'Donnell. But not Michael Moore. You see, his mother was in
that city, and now that he's actually experienced a loss to these
barbarians that so many others have in the past that he's blinded
himself to since he uses his wealth to mask the world's real
problems, he suddenly is pressing the President to fire nukes at
Muslim support cities in retaliation and to help reduce the number of
terrorists and potential terrorists. He also joins the president in
making a point to terrorists: Attack the US and we'll systematically
destroy all your cities around the world. Since most of them are in
shithole countries, it's no big loss anyway.

Now do you get it?

#32

RS says: Good pay

tables mean nothing if the machine doesn't hit. A good machine is
one that wins, and nothing less.

This is possibly the stupidest thing you've ever said.

Lets see.....If I see a 10/7 DB machine then it's automaticall
a 'good machine'. Never mind that I just lost $4400 on it. HA! But
that 8/5 DDB machine next to it just paid me $2300 profit, but
according to you it's a 'bad machine'! Can you possibly become more
warped in your thinking?

Lie. Your system involves frequent cashouts, which must be added to

make

decisions later on in the system. Now I'm wondering if you've ever

actually

played your system or if the entire thing is a fabrication.

I could add up how many dumps I took on any given day too. No math
involved other than simple common sense. The sooner you geeks
eliminate statistical analyses of everything you experience in life,
the sooner you'll wake up to the real world.

#33

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
>I've been on machines that have paid one time and not another. By
>your definition I guess this would be goodbad machine. If only you
>knew how ridiculous your statements have become.

That's what I call pure brilliance. It wins today, it's a good
machine. It loses tomorrow it's a bad machine. vp machines are only
as good or bad as they do for you TODAY. No theories. No baloney.
Just the facts.

ROTFLMAO. It's a bad machine. No, it's a good machine. No, it's a bad
machine. No, it's a good machine.

Maybe it has nothing to do with the machine ... Robbie, you'll feel
better tomorrow after the doctors refill your prescription.

>Nope. More likely the bomb is set on a timer or has someone right
>there with it.

No waffling the issues with me!

I see you object to clear, crisp logic being applied to your murky
scenario. What a suprise.

I've cleared the mess you wrote to
give it to he-who-cannot-comprehend again. 1000 Muslim scum

Racist.

in a
building. One is a terrorist who's brought a nuclear bomb into the

US

and warns in advance, so we will sweat, that he will set it off
withing the next 10 days.

Stupid scenario at best. Why would they care if we sweat? Why give us
time to react? You really are a moron. In addition, previously, you
left it ambiguous whether all were terrorists or just one. Make up
your mind.

PS. The chances of him being alone in this are NIL.

It is off-site (do you know what that
means)?

Since that is what I said (not you) would be the case, it's pretty
clear I know. The real quetion is whether you'd have figured it out
without me.

A radioactivity scan/check of the building confirms that. It
could be on a timer. Doesn't matter. The animal has to be

identified

and eliminated just in case he needs to be there to detonate it

(ever

hear of suicide bombers?).

Anyone ever hear of ONE person on a mission like this? Acquiring a
nuclear device, getting it into the country, etc., etc. Only a moron
would come to the conclusion it was one man.

RS IMMEDIATELY destroys the building, the terrorist, and 999
innocents. No loss to the civilized world. Threat reduced but not
eliminated.

Not reduced in the least bit. I still think capture and interrogation
would work out a lot better. Of course, then you wouldn't get to kill
all those innocent folks, would you? Racist!

Reduced is the best we could do since there was no time
to investigate to find out who he was so we could torture him for
answers.

Of course there's time. 10 days. It's YOUR idiotic scenario.

A massive search entails and the bomb is located 8 days
later.

Great, now we have a chance to find and destroy it.

Well-known among those familiar with suitcase nuclear weapons,
it requires hands-on detonation.

What a joke. Who ever said it would be in a suitcase? By the way, ANY
device that can be detonated manually can be detonated remotely. Oh,
hold on, it was your idiotic secanrio in the first place. I'm not
surprised to see you toss in another idiotic statement.

Hope for the best that there's no
more. Lessons learned for the Muslim terrorists around the world:

Pre-

emption is the policy, and you will lose.

Kill the only possible lead you have and you will lose??? Can it
really be this easy to make you like an imbicile???

RG on the other hand, shows typical liberal/peacenik weakness and
waffling. He begs the 1000 people to produce the terrorist so he

can

have a 'reasonable discussion' with him. But of course, no one

knows

who it is. So Dick, being the humanitarian that he is, lets

everyone

go.

Nope. You can try putting words into my keyboard but it won't work,
AGAIN.

6 days later a massive explosion occurs and over 2 million people
die.

Most likely the result when you destroy your only lead. LMAO.

Now do you get it?

I got it all along. You tried to set up a ridiculous scenario to
make an idiotic point. All you ended up doing was looking like a fool.

#34

RS says: Good pay

tables mean nothing if the machine doesn't hit. A good machine is one
that wins, and nothing less.

This is possibly the stupidest thing you've ever said.

<<Lets see.....If I see a 10/7 DB machine then it's automaticall a 'good
machine'. Never mind that I just lost $4400 on it. HA! But that 8/5 DDB
machine next to it just paid me $2300 profit, but according to you it's a
'bad machine'!>>

Lie. I didn't call any machines "good" or "bad." I called your statement
"possibly the stupidest thing you've ever said." Either you're telling
people to play machines that have hit recently without regard for the odds,
which is a recipe for disaster, or you're telling people to pick machines
based on knowledge of the future, which is simply stupid. Our only knowledge
of the future is a probabilistic one, and in Nevada video poker that is 100%
pay tables.

Lie. Your system involves frequent cashouts, which must be added to

make

decisions later on in the system. Now I'm wondering if you've ever

actually

played your system or if the entire thing is a fabrication.

<<No math involved other than simple common sense.>>

Lie. You use addition, not "common sense," to run your system. In fact, your
system takes a hell of a lot more math to play than simply playing a
positive game.

Cogno

#35

> That's what I call pure brilliance. It wins today, it's a good
> machine. It loses tomorrow it's a bad machine. vp machines are

only as good or bad as they do for you TODAY. No theories. No
baloney. Just the facts.

ROTFLMAO. It's a bad machine. No, it's a good machine. No, it's a
bad machine. No, it's a good machine. Maybe it has nothing to do

with the machine ... Robbie, you'll feel

better tomorrow after the doctors refill your prescription.

How 'bout it has everything to do with the machine, like whether it
wins or loses for the player? Ever hear of that, or is all your play
in fantasyland?
  

I see you object to clear, crisp logic being applied to your murky
scenario. What a suprise.

The not-so-big-a-surprise is that you can't wiggle out of answering
it like you normally do.

> I've cleared the mess you wrote to
> give it to he-who-cannot-comprehend again. 1000 Muslim scum

Racist.

Better to be a live racist in a city where 2million people are saved
than a t-o-l-e-r-a-n-t fool who's driven by the guilt of d-i-v-e-r-s-
i-t-y.

Stupid scenario at best. Why would they care if we sweat? Why give
us time to react? You really are a moron. In addition, previously,
you left it ambiguous whether all were terrorists or just one. Make
up your mind. PS. The chances of him being alone in this are NIL.

This is your blatant inexperience outside the world of Dick being
exhibited once again. Muslim terrorists love to make their enemies
sweat because they irrationally think we do what we do to them to
make them sweat. I said ONE was a terrorist. Again, ONE. And your
comment about the chances of his being alone further demonstrate your
lack of knowledge of what we have to deal with in the real world, and
confirm your failed ability to waffle on the subject again.

Since that is what I said (not you) would be the case, it's pretty
clear I know. The real quetion is whether you'd have figured it out
without me.

Read the original scenario again and figure it out.

Anyone ever hear of ONE person on a mission like this? Acquiring a
nuclear device, getting it into the country, etc., etc. Only a
moron would come to the conclusion it was one man.

And that's the type of exact ignorance these people count on us
having to get and keep their advantage.
  

> RS IMMEDIATELY destroys the building, the terrorist, and 999
> innocents. No loss to the civilized world. Threat reduced but not
> eliminated.

Not reduced in the least bit. I still think capture and
interrogation would work out a lot better. Of course, then you
wouldn't get to kill all those innocent folks, would you? Racist!

Capture? Capture who? You gonna hand out ACLU laminated doctrine
cards also?

Of course there's time. 10 days. It's YOUR idiotic scenario.

Yo! It was UP TO 10 days. Big difference. Another case of reading
without comprehension.

> Well-known among those familiar with suitcase nuclear weapons,
> it requires hands-on detonation.

What a joke. Who ever said it would be in a suitcase? By the way,
ANY device that can be detonated manually can be detonated remotely.
Oh, hold on, it was your idiotic secanrio in the first place. I'm
not surprised to see you toss in another idiotic statement.

Another case of inexperienced blabber. There is only one type of
mobile nuclear device not being delivered by a missile system--
SUITCASE is the terminology for it. Generally, it IS in a suitcase.
And it cannot be detonated remotely. Ever.

Kill the only possible lead you have and you will lose??? Can it
really be this easy to make you like an imbicile???

What 'lead'? He'll be blown to bits too, unless if a peacenik like
you lets him get out. So now you say let him blow up the city, get
away so we can follow him to his leaders, and all will be fine. You
are so naiive. Thank God we have a strong leader and people like me
who understand the right way and the wrong way to handle things.
Imagine if Kerry were in now? BOOM--we'd all be gone. And if Ted
Kennedy were in charge? Ha! He has to have 5 meals a day just to have
the strength to bad-mouth GWB.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#36

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Cogno Scienti"
<cognoscienti@g...> wrote:

Lie. I didn't call any machines "good" or "bad." I called your

statement

"possibly the stupidest thing you've ever said." Either you're

telling

people to play machines that have hit recently without regard for

the odds,

which is a recipe for disaster, or you're telling people to pick

machines

based on knowledge of the future, which is simply stupid. Our only

knowledge

of the future is a probabilistic one, and in Nevada video poker

that is 100%

pay tables.

You've talked yourself into confusion corner. Machines can be deemed
neither good nor bad until AFTER you play them. All that theory and
math nonsense does is create a make-believe, feel-good or feel-bad
scenario for the statistical nerds to get excited about.

Lie. You use addition, not "common sense," to run your system. In
fact, your system takes a hell of a lot more math to play than
simply playing apositive game.

Each hand is simple common sense and has nothing to do with math.
Adding cash out slips is hardly applying the strange mathematics you
need in order to understand the useless stats of a machine.

#37

Again, you've run out of gas. I think your responses here are sufficient to
prove you a fraud.

Cogno

···

-----Original Message-----
From: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FREEvpF…@…com] On
Behalf Of rsing1111
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 10:42 PM
To: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FREEvpFREE] Re: Congoisms

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Cogno Scienti"
<cognoscienti@g...> wrote:

Lie. I didn't call any machines "good" or "bad." I called your

statement

"possibly the stupidest thing you've ever said." Either you're

telling

people to play machines that have hit recently without regard for

the odds,

which is a recipe for disaster, or you're telling people to pick

machines

based on knowledge of the future, which is simply stupid. Our only

knowledge

of the future is a probabilistic one, and in Nevada video poker

that is 100%

pay tables.

You've talked yourself into confusion corner. Machines can be deemed neither
good nor bad until AFTER you play them. All that theory and math nonsense
does is create a make-believe, feel-good or feel-bad scenario for the
statistical nerds to get excited about.

Lie. You use addition, not "common sense," to run your system. In
fact, your system takes a hell of a lot more math to play than simply
playing apositive game.

Each hand is simple common sense and has nothing to do with math.
Adding cash out slips is hardly applying the strange mathematics you need in
order to understand the useless stats of a machine.

vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm

Yahoo! Groups Links

#38

An easy way out Congo? Too much common sense for all the intellect to
handle?

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Cogno Scienti"
<cognoscienti@g...> wrote:

Again, you've run out of gas. I think your responses here are

sufficient to

prove you a fraud.

Cogno

From: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com

[mailto:FREEvpF…@…com] On

Behalf Of rsing1111
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 10:42 PM
To: FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FREEvpFREE] Re: Congoisms

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Cogno Scienti"
<cognoscienti@g...> wrote:
> Lie. I didn't call any machines "good" or "bad." I called your
statement
> "possibly the stupidest thing you've ever said." Either you're
telling
> people to play machines that have hit recently without regard for
the odds,
> which is a recipe for disaster, or you're telling people to pick
machines
> based on knowledge of the future, which is simply stupid. Our only
knowledge
> of the future is a probabilistic one, and in Nevada video poker
that is 100%
> pay tables.

You've talked yourself into confusion corner. Machines can be

deemed neither

good nor bad until AFTER you play them. All that theory and math

nonsense

does is create a make-believe, feel-good or feel-bad scenario for

the

statistical nerds to get excited about.

> Lie. You use addition, not "common sense," to run your system. In
>fact, your system takes a hell of a lot more math to play than

simply

>playing apositive game.

Each hand is simple common sense and has nothing to do with math.
Adding cash out slips is hardly applying the strange mathematics

you need in

···

-----Original Message-----
order to understand the useless stats of a machine.

vpFREE Links: http://members.cox.net/vpfree/Links.htm

Yahoo! Groups Links

#39

<<Too much common sense for all the intellect to handle?>>

Common sense (uneducated beliefs about practical matters) is what the
casinos depend on to take your money. You keep using that phrase as if
somehow it were superior to be uneducated.

You are a proven liar, fraud, and welsher.

Cogno

#40

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Cogno Scienti" <cognoscienti@g...>
wrote:

<<Too much common sense for all the intellect to handle?>>

Common sense (uneducated beliefs about practical matters) is what the
casinos depend on to take your money. You keep using that phrase as if
somehow it were superior to be uneducated.
You are a proven liar, fraud, and welsher.

Far from being 'uneducated' my Master's Degree qualifies my beliefs to
be just a tad bit more than you're nebulous definition for common
sense. That's why I've been able to out-wit, out-think and out-perform
every self-proclaimed guru and math geek that's come along during my
reign. As far as casinos taking money, I guess you're more of an expert
in that field than I'll ever be. I can't make out what the blabber in
your 2nd sentence was suppose to mean, otherwise I'm sure I'd be having
you look like twice the fool right now. Your 3rd sentence is the usual
unproven name-calling that those frustrated with my superiority and
incomprehensible winning rate, frequently resort to.