you think and has nothing to do with reality.
Please read that and grammarize it so it has meaning--right or wrong.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
And, as I said before, advantage play does require you to play any
more often or any where you don't want to. This is what Rob wants
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> > And this is supposed to mean something in a short-term session?
>
> Yes, are you brain dead? It means you may already be down more
> credits than the quad is worth.And most of the time it isn't,
Could you be LESS specific?
or other times a specal quad is hit
that automatically recovers everything and more.
And, at other times it isn't.
Try to allow your
pea brain to see the entire scenario rather than just the negative
part your theories want to be true all the time.
I've got it, Princess. And the negative goes right along with the
positive.
>
> Wong again Princess, you CAN have it both ways. You can set
whatever short goals you want while still playing positive games
correctly. I believe that is BOTH ways and shows beyond any doubt
that "you just don't understand".You mean "YOU" want to have it both ways, but you are 100%
incorrect
again. You keep blabbing that it's possible to win more than you
lose
in the 'short-term', but then you go on to mess up your spark of
common sense by making believe that "if it's a positive game you
will
win, and if it's a negative game you will lose' rhetoric.
Did you miss somethingagain, Princess. Did you entirely forget our
bell curve conversation? You are such an idiot.
THAT's what
wanting it both ways is, and THAT's why you understand little in
the
area of what constitutes successful video poker play.
No, wanting has nothing to do with it, Princess. It's all in the
numbers. Statistics is a proven method for understanding random
systems. You're crying "the earth is flat" can't overcome that fact.
>
> > Again, you confuse the issue with your math model nonsense.
Here's your answer, and I'm the one you should be asking unless you
are afraid to. When you get a quad at lower level you usually have
a
> cash-out in one strategy, and always in another.
>
> Sure, Princess ... Now click your heels together 3 times ...From someone who doesn't know how I play and can only theorize, I'd
say that was a fairly clear answer of "I don't understand".
It doesn't matter how you play, Princess. The statistical methods are
the only thing that matters.
>
> Once again, Princess, your individual results mean NOTHING (other
> than you've been lucky).No, one thing they do is irritate you, and that's worth the time.
Every bit of it.
Dream on, Princess.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> > > And this is supposed to mean something in a short-term
session?
> >
> > Yes, are you brain dead? It means you may already be down more
> > credits than the quad is worth.
>
> And most of the time it isn't,Could you be LESS specific?
For a brain like yours? You don't want to get it because it makes you
feel funny.
> or other times a specal quad is hit
> that automatically recovers everything and more.And, at other times it isn't.
As you've seen from my results, most of the time it is. But you get
heartburn when I say that, so I'll say it again: "Most of the time it
is".
> Try to allow your
> pea brain to see the entire scenario rather than just the
negative part your theories want to be true all the time.
I've got it, Princess. And the negative goes right along with the
positive.
And you think that if I were playing any game over 100%, theory says
I'd win and you'd be satisfied, but on games just a wee bit under
100%, it's not possible. Hahaha!! Pea brain strikes again. It's
amazing how one can be so thick at one end yet so tiny at the other.
> You mean "YOU" want to have it both ways, but you are 100%
incorrect again. You keep blabbing that it's possible to win more
than you lose in the 'short-term', but then you go on to mess up your
spark of common sense by making believe that "if it's a positive game
you will win, and if it's a negative game you will lose' rhetoric.
Did you miss somethingagain, Princess. Did you entirely forget our
bell curve conversation? You are such an idiot.
You and that crutch again. You have no creativity in you to reason
things out, so you hang your cookiness on some useless curve that is
a good make-believe tool for theorests and not realists. I hope you
were smarter in your younger years.....
No, wanting has nothing to do with it, Princess. It's all in the
numbers. Statistics is a proven method for understanding random
systems. You're crying "the earth is flat" can't overcome that fact.
Wanting has EVERYTHING to do with you and your theories when you
can't figure something out. Neurosis is a common problem among geeks
who are always on the verge of tilt. I unserstand you have one foot
in the grave and are anxious to get in as much video poker as
possible so you might get lucky enough to win something before you
go. Might that little fact be clouding your mind and altering your
thinking at this point?
> From someone who doesn't know how I play and can only theorize,
I'd say that was a fairly clear answer of "I don't understand".
It doesn't matter how you play, Princess. The statistical methods
are the only thing that matters.
Contradicting yourself again? First you say it does, then you say it
doesn't, then you say it does, etc. How i play is your ONLY problem
the past few weeks, and you are irritated no end at the fact you
can't figure out how it is my results are positive on games you
theorize cannot win over 229 sessions. Yes, first 229 is a teeny
weeny number that means nothing in the overall scheme of things, then
it's a huge number to you that says all you need to know to blurt out
your theoretical nonsense. We can easily see all you do is attempt to
make the situation fit your agenda. But you're such a weasel and get
caught with your pants down (heaven help us!) every time that I
wouldn't doubt it if your wife tried to slap some sense into you at
this point.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
> No, one thing they do is irritate you, and that's worth the time.
> Every bit of it.Dream on, Princess. Irritation??
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> > --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
> wrote:
> > > > And this is supposed to mean something in a short-term
session?
> > >
> > > Yes, are you brain dead? It means you may already be down
more
> > > credits than the quad is worth.
> >
> > And most of the time it isn't,
>
> Could you be LESS specific?For a brain like yours? You don't want to get it because it makes
you
feel funny.
Get what? That your system cannot work as shown conclusively in
Reids' proof. That you can't respond to my rational post with
anything but stupidity. Sure I get it.
>
> > or other times a specal quad is hit
> > that automatically recovers everything and more.
>
> And, at other times it isn't.As you've seen from my results, most of the time it is. But you get
heartburn when I say that, so I'll say it again: "Most of the time
it
is".
I don't care about your results, Princess, because, generally, those
wins don't make up for the times when you don't hit. Unless, of
course, you play positive machines.
>
> > Try to allow your
> > pea brain to see the entire scenario rather than just the
negative part your theories want to be true all the time.
>
> I've got it, Princess. And the negative goes right along with the
> positive.And you think that if I were playing any game over 100%, theory
says
I'd win and you'd be satisfied,
Of course, are you completely brain dead.
but on games just a wee bit under
100%, it's not possible. Hahaha!!
Generally speaking, if you're real close to 100% a larger part of the
bell curve will fall into winning category then if you're
significantly negative. Even more if the payback is over 100%. It's a
continuum, Princess. If you'd been listening you'd know there are no
absolutes.
>
> > You mean "YOU" want to have it both ways, but you are 100%
> incorrect again. You keep blabbing that it's possible to win more
than you lose in the 'short-term', but then you go on to mess up
your
spark of common sense by making believe that "if it's a positive
game
you will win, and if it's a negative game you will lose' rhetoric.
>
> Did you miss somethingagain, Princess. Did you entirely forget
our
> bell curve conversation? You are such an idiot.
You and that crutch again.
The same crutch used by ALL the fortune 500 companies? Yes, that one.
You have no creativity in you to reason
things out, so you hang your cookiness on some useless curve that
is
a good make-believe tool for theorests and not realists.
Yes, those companies that bet their profits every year on these silly
little theories. Imagine, all those companines using that useless
curve in their projections all year long.
>
> No, wanting has nothing to do with it, Princess. It's all in the
> numbers. Statistics is a proven method for understanding random
> systems. You're crying "the earth is flat" can't overcome that
fact.
Wanting has EVERYTHING to do with you and your theories
Not MY theories. Proven mathematical methods used by every single
fortune 500 company. Get it, Princess. These companies bet BILLIONs
of dollars annually using these methods. You can be assured they
would scoff at you're comical rants. So, tell me Princess, how is it
you know more than all of these companies???
> > From someone who doesn't know how I play and can only theorize,
> I'd say that was a fairly clear answer of "I don't understand".
>
> It doesn't matter how you play, Princess. The statistical methods
are the only thing that matters.Contradicting yourself again?
Not even once, Princess. So, tell me again that you know more than
ALL of the fortune 500 comapnies ...
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
> --- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
> For a brain like yours? You don't want to get it because it makes
you feel funny.Get what? That your system cannot work as shown conclusively in
Reids' proof. That you can't respond to my rational post with
anything but stupidity. Sure I get it.
Do you know how dumb you still sound? Who cares how it can
be "shown?" I certainly only care about its results during my play
sessions, just as any normal person else would. Worrying about how
and why it works in theory is only for nerds who just can't seem to
get those coke-bottle glasses clean enough to see anything clearly.
> As you've seen from my results, most of the time it is. But you
get heartburn when I say that, so I'll say it again: "Most of the
time it is".
I don't care about your results, Princess, because, generally,
those wins don't make up for the times when you don't hit. Unless, of
course, you play positive machines.
So you're again saying if the machine is 99.54% I can't do it
successfully, but if it's 100.17% I can. Haha! As dopey as they come.
Must be the same for everyone then who plays non-positive machines at
any time. Must be they lose, right--none of them ever win? Get the
techincal bug out of your mind and live a little.
> but on games just a wee bit under
> 100%, it's not possible. Hahaha!!Generally speaking, if you're real close to 100% a larger part of
the bell curve will fall into winning category then if you're
significantly negative. Even more if the payback is over 100%. It's
a continuum, Princess. If you'd been listening you'd know there are
no absolutes.
And again you're talking generalities here reflecting infinity. Get a
life! That stupid bell curve has nothing to do with results once you
actually go in to play a session. It's all nonsensical theory for
googly-eyed nerds to use as a tool since all they usually are able to
do is just that and not play. All that talk about probabilities and
absolutes--no wonder you lead a sour life. Everything must be
analyzed to the nth degree before you can either accept or decline it-
-whether or not it has anything to do with or affects you in the
slightest. That's called neurosis of the live-er.
Yes, those companies that bet their profits every year on these
silly little theories. Imagine, all those companines using that
useless curve in their projections all year long.
So who cares what they do or how you think they do it? You've already
shown little if any knowledge of how big companies operate. Now
you're trying to apply your stupid theories to what they do. Stick
with what you are tied to in a never-ending curse: video poker
neurotic anxieties.
Not MY theories. Proven mathematical methods used by every single
fortune 500 company. Get it, Princess. These companies bet BILLIONs
of dollars annually using these methods. You can be assured they
would scoff at you're comical rants. So, tell me Princess, how is
it you know more than all of these companies???
And you think it matter to me what a big company or companies would
say about my method of play? Hohoho! Do you worry about what others
think all the time? I play very successfully--moreso than anyone ever
has. And I need to be looking over my shoulder at some Fortune 500
analyst who can't keep up with me? Hahahehehe!!
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> > For a brain like yours? You don't want to get it because it
makes
> you feel funny.
>
> Get what? That your system cannot work as shown conclusively in
> Reids' proof. That you can't respond to my rational post with
> anything but stupidity. Sure I get it.Do you know how dumb you still sound? Who cares how it can
be "shown?"
Anyone who actually wants to have an edge over the casinos.
I certainly only care about its results during my play
sessions,
That's why you play positive or near positive machines, Princess.
just as any normal person else would.
As if you'd know one ...
Worrying about how
and why it works in theory is only for nerds who just can't seem to
get those coke-bottle glasses clean enough to see anything clearly.
Sure it is, Princess ... Keep clicking those heals together and say
it 2 more times.
>
> > As you've seen from my results, most of the time it is. But you
get heartburn when I say that, so I'll say it again: "Most of the
time it is".
>
> I don't care about your results, Princess, because, generally,
those wins don't make up for the times when you don't hit. Unless,
of
> course, you play positive machines.
So you're again saying if the machine is 99.54% I can't do it
successfully, but if it's 100.17% I can. Haha!
If you could read with understanding then you'd realize that is NOT
what I said. But read on, maybe you'll figure it out later.
>
> > but on games just a wee bit under
> > 100%, it's not possible. Hahaha!!
>
> Generally speaking, if you're real close to 100% a larger part of
the bell curve will fall into winning category then if you're
> significantly negative. Even more if the payback is over 100%.
It's
a continuum, Princess. If you'd been listening you'd know there are
no absolutes.And again you're talking generalities here reflecting infinity.
I see. You don't talk generalities. You must be able to predict the
future. So, tell us, Swami, who will win the world series? Who will
win the Super Bowl? What will the stock market hit next month? No
generalities now ...
But then, I thought you indicated earlier you didn't promise everyone
they would win with YOUR system? Has that changed now? If not, then
you DO speak in generalities.
Finally, when dealing with the future, there actually are an almost
infinite number of possibilities. That's why a statistical method is
the ONLY one that works.
Get a
life! That stupid bell curve has nothing to do with results once
you
actually go in to play a session.
There you go, showing your ignorance again. The bell curve actually
does contain everyones' possible results within it. And, it shows you
the likelihood of attaining said results. And, it does it much better
than the Princess could ever do.
It's all nonsensical theory for
googly-eyed nerds
So, now all the fortune 500 company executives are "googly-eyed
nerds". The Pincess is right and they are all wrong. Does this sound
like a sickness ???
>
> Yes, those companies that bet their profits every year on these
silly little theories. Imagine, all those companines using that
useless curve in their projections all year long.So who cares what they do or how you think they do it?
Obviously not you, Princess. But then if you did you wouldn't be able
to perpetuate your little scam, would you?
>
> Not MY theories. Proven mathematical methods used by every single
> fortune 500 company. Get it, Princess. These companies bet
BILLIONs
> of dollars annually using these methods. You can be assured they
> would scoff at you're comical rants. So, tell me Princess, how is
it you know more than all of these companies???And you think it matter to me what a big company or companies would
say about my method of play?
Of course I don't ... But you should care.
Hohoho! Do you worry about what others
think all the time? I play very successfully--moreso than anyone
ever
has. And I need to be looking over my shoulder at some Fortune 500
analyst who can't keep up with me? Hahahehehe!!
I'll take this as a 100% agreement that you believe you are right and
the fortune 500 companies are ALL wrong. Need I say more!
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
> Do you know how dumb you still sound? Who cares how it can
> be "shown?"Anyone who actually wants to have an edge over the casinos.
Having a so-called "edge" over a casino is of no value if it
is 'shown' to anyone. Winning is the proof. And if you think any
players who labels themselves 'advantage-players' truly have any sort
of an 'edge' over any casino anywhere, you should be living in LV so
you can be constantly roped in like cattle to the daily promotions
the rest of the poor misled souls there do. Then, I guarantee you'll
understand, and not just be licking your chops pretending how it has
got to be worth some stupid number like 27c/hour for this and
67.4c/hour for that.
> I certainly only care about its results during my play
> sessions,That's why you play positive or near positive machines, Princess.
But I don't. 7/5 BP? 9/6 DDB? Those are common in my play everywhere.
Pay tables are very low on my cares when i play. Any machine with a
reasonable pay table can be beaten.
> Worrying about how
> and why it works in theory is only for nerds who just can't seem
to get those coke-bottle glasses clean enough to see anything clearly.
Sure it is, Princess ... Keep clicking those heals together and say
it 2 more times.
So what happen to the crying about being a bigot this time? Oh I
know; I forgot to mention that stupid shirt-pocket protector with 6
or 7 pens inside. The "geek-completer"
> > I don't care about your results, Princess, because, generally,
> those wins don't make up for the times when you don't hit.
Unless, of course, you play positive machines.
Here's more. Generally and indeed most of the time, those hit DO make
up for the times I don't hit. Maybe your nerd work-up can't figure
out how to show that on paper, but that's what really happens. No
theories required.
>
> So you're again saying if the machine is 99.54% I can't do it
> successfully, but if it's 100.17% I can. Haha!If you could read with understanding then you'd realize that is NOT
what I said. But read on, maybe you'll figure it out later.
Even when you don't say it, you do.....
> > > but on games just a wee bit under
> > > 100%, it's not possible. Hahaha!!
> >
> > Generally speaking, if you're real close to 100% a larger part
of the bell curve will fall into winning category then if you're
significantly negative. Even more if the payback is over 100%. It's
> a continuum, Princess. If you'd been listening you'd know there
are no absolutes.
Ding dong, there's that useless-to-video-poker bell curve crutch once
again. As I said above, all you can say is "If it's 99.9999% you will
lose, but if it's 100.00001% you will win". It's starting to get
creepy.
I see. You don't talk generalities. You must be able to predict the
future. So, tell us, Swami, who will win the world series? Who will
win the Super Bowl? What will the stock market hit next month? No
generalities now ...
Depends on who plays, and when we know I can tell you who. If I win I
win, and if I lose I lose. There's absolutely no valueless theories
or science involved. If I were as good at winning on sports bets as I
am as winning at vp, most people would believe me when I told them,
because I'd have a significant set of actuals as support for my
choices. Same with the market. You live on theory and I live on
reality. I believe what I've already seen and you only do when you
match it up with something drawn out on a piece of paper. That's what
generalities are based on -- rampant insecurity.
But then, I thought you indicated earlier you didn't promise
everyone they would win with YOUR system? Has that changed now? If
not, then you DO speak in generalities.
How's that a generality? You're getting stuck now but I'll bail you
out once again. I said people will not consistently win unless they
do exactly as I do. That means, to the challenged here, that if they
happen to play under the exact same circumstances as I do then they
will win, and if they don't they will not. Clear and to the point,
and if you think there's a generality there somewhere then you won't
accept that point.
Finally, when dealing with the future, there actually are an almost
infinite number of possibilities. That's why a statistical method
is the ONLY one that works.
Sure, if you want to analyze something to death with absolutely no
point in doing so. But you cannot factor in anything humans do to
change what you precious statistics say SHOULD be the case.
> Get a life! That stupid bell curve has nothing to do with results
once you actually go in to play a session.
There you go, showing your ignorance again. The bell curve actually
does contain everyones' possible results within it. And, it shows
you the likelihood of attaining said results. And, it does it much
better than the Princess could ever do.
It's all a geek theory once again and it has been proven to be wrong.
Notice you said 'possible results'. Who cares what's possible? I only
care about what really happens, and in video poker anything can and
does happen all the time on a daily basis when you give it the chance
to....session by session. I'm not a dreamer. I actually go out and
make it happen.
So, now all the fortune 500 company executives are "googly-eyed
nerds".
No, just the analysts, and that's why we in management have the
opportunity to take any course we'd like when it make more sense to
do so. It's called risk--the source of every success known to man.
> And you think it matter to me what a big company or companies
would say about my method of play?
Of course I don't ... But you should care.
???
> Hohoho! Do you worry about what others think all the time? I play
very successfully--moreso than anyone ever has. And I need to be
looking over my shoulder at some Fortune 500 nerd who can't keep up
with me? Hahahehehe!!
I'll take this as a 100% agreement that you believe you are right
and the fortune 500 companies are ALL wrong. Need I say more!
No, because you look more dumb every second when you say even a
little. If I relied on what F-500 companies thought about me, I'd be
as neurotic as you are.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> > Do you know how dumb you still sound? Who cares how it can
> > be "shown?"
>
> Anyone who actually wants to have an edge over the casinos.Having a so-called "edge" over a casino is of no value if it
is 'shown' to anyone.
Is this another fantasy dream of yours or are you serious? An edge is
an edge, plain and simple.
Winning is the proof.
Sure it is, Princess. If it were true then lotteries would be easy
pickings. Hey, there's lots of big lottery winners out there.
And if you think any
players who labels themselves 'advantage-players' truly have any
sort
of an 'edge' over any casino anywhere, you should be living in LV
Who's says I'm not?
so
you can be constantly roped in like cattle to the daily promotions
the rest of the poor misled souls there do. Then, I guarantee
you'll
understand, and not just be licking your chops pretending how it
has
got to be worth some stupid number like 27c/hour for this and
67.4c/hour for that.
Actually, it's more like $17.11.
> >
> > So you're again saying if the machine is 99.54% I can't do it
> > successfully, but if it's 100.17% I can. Haha!
>
> If you could read with understanding then you'd realize that is
NOT
> what I said. But read on, maybe you'll figure it out later.
Even when you don't say it, you do.....
Did you read on? From your reply, I'd guess not ... At least not with
any kind of open mind.
>
> > > > but on games just a wee bit under
> > > > 100%, it's not possible. Hahaha!!
> > >
> > > Generally speaking, if you're real close to 100% a larger
part
of the bell curve will fall into winning category then if you're
significantly negative. Even more if the payback is over 100%. It's
> > a continuum, Princess. If you'd been listening you'd know there
are no absolutes.Ding dong, there's that useless-to-video-poker bell curve crutch
once
again. As I said above, all you can say is "If it's 99.9999% you
will
lose, but if it's 100.00001% you will win".
No, that's EXACTLY the opposite of what the bell curve indicates. Put
down that bottle and pay attention, Princess.
>
> I see. You don't talk generalities. You must be able to predict
the
> future. So, tell us, Swami, who will win the world series? Who
will
> win the Super Bowl? What will the stock market hit next month? No
> generalities now ...Depends on who plays, and when we know I can tell you who.
Come on, swami, if your so good at knowing the future give us your
best shot.
If I win I
win, and if I lose I lose. There's absolutely no valueless theories
or science involved.
You NEED to deny the science in order to perpetuate your fraud. It's
so obvious.
If I were as good at winning on sports bets as I
am as winning at vp, most people would believe me when I told them,
because I'd have a significant set of actuals as support for my
choices. Same with the market. You live on theory and I live on
reality. I believe what I've already seen and you only do when you
match it up with something drawn out on a piece of paper. That's
what
generalities are based on -- rampant insecurity.
Interestingly, the people who do WELL at sports betting and the stock
market tend to use statistical analysis techniques. The very same
thing you call nonsense.
>
> But then, I thought you indicated earlier you didn't promise
everyone they would win with YOUR system? Has that changed now? If
not, then you DO speak in generalities.How's that a generality? You're getting stuck now but I'll bail you
out once again. I said people will not consistently win unless they
do exactly as I do. That means, to the challenged here, that if
they
happen to play under the exact same circumstances as I do then they
will win, and if they don't they will not. Clear and to the point,
and if you think there's a generality there somewhere then you
won't
accept that point.
That's your escape route. "Oh, gee, you must not have played exactly
like I would ...". You are such an obvious scammer.
>
> Finally, when dealing with the future, there actually are an
almost
> infinite number of possibilities. That's why a statistical method
is the ONLY one that works.Sure, if you want to analyze something to death with absolutely no
point in doing so. But you cannot factor in anything humans do to
change what you precious statistics say SHOULD be the case.
And, what can a human do to change the output of a VP machine?
Nothing. Unless of course, you claim you can predict the future.
Wait, there's that swami thing again. You're in a box, Princess. You
either have claim you can predict the future, or you have to accept
that statistical analysis is the only valid approach. (Of course, you
won't do either, you'll just rant something that we've all heard
before).
>
> > Get a life! That stupid bell curve has nothing to do with
results
once you actually go in to play a session.
>
> There you go, showing your ignorance again. The bell curve
actually
> does contain everyones' possible results within it. And, it shows
you the likelihood of attaining said results. And, it does it much
better than the Princess could ever do.It's all a geek theory once again and it has been proven to be
wrong.
Of course it has, Princess ... The fact is, it has been proven RIGHT
many times which kind of gets in the way of your scam, doesn't it?
Notice you said 'possible results'. Who cares what's possible? I
only
care about what really happens,
If you're trying to figure out the future then "possible results" are
the only thing us mortals can consider, Swami.
>
> So, now all the fortune 500 company executives are "googly-eyed
> nerds".No, just the analysts, and that's why we in management have the
opportunity to take any course we'd like when it make more sense to
do so. It's called risk--the source of every success known to man.
Yes, that is true. Management hired the analysts and they pay them
good money. Why do they do that? Clearly, not to ignore what they
produce. It's so they can reduce the risk as much as possible.
> > And you think it matter to me what a big company or companies
would say about my method of play?
>
> Of course I don't ... But you should care.???
>
> > Hohoho! Do you worry about what others think all the time? I
play
very successfully--moreso than anyone ever has. And I need to be
looking over my shoulder at some Fortune 500 nerd who can't keep up
with me? Hahahehehe!!
>
> I'll take this as a 100% agreement that you believe you are right
and the fortune 500 companies are ALL wrong. Need I say more!No, because you look more dumb every second when you say even a
little. If I relied on what F-500 companies thought about me, I'd
be
as neurotic as you are.
Sure, Princess. Give it up. You are so behind the eight ball. You can
sit there and claim more knowledge than all the fortune 500 companies
all day long and no one will believe you.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
> Having a so-called "edge" over a casino is of no value if it
> is 'shown' to anyone.Is this another fantasy dream of yours or are you serious? An edge
is an edge, plain and simple.
Yeah, just like all the ninkompoops who chase casino promotions
whenever they scrape up enough cash to do so do. Casinos are the only
entity with an edge, ever. They are the only ones who are in it for
the long-term, ever. The rest is geek wannabee fantasy.
Sure it is, Princess. If it were true then lotteries would be easy
pickings. Hey, there's lots of big lottery winners out there.
Don't know about you, but I believe in lottery winners.
> And if you think any
> players who labels themselves 'advantage-players' truly have any
sort of an 'edge' over any casino anywhere, you should be living in
LV
Who's says I'm not?
An advantage player, or living in LV? Either way that makes you a
loser.
Actually, it's more like $17.11.
Yipee! Why not make that $645.79? We can all pay the bills with a
theoretical figure!
> >
> Ding dong, there's that useless-to-video-poker bell curve crutch
once again. As I said above, all you can say is "If it's 99.9999%
you will lose, but if it's 100.00001% you will win".
No, that's EXACTLY the opposite of what the bell curve indicates.
Put down that bottle and pay attention, Princess.
Now you change your tune again. Before it was this and now it isn't.
You sure that bell isn't ringing somewhere upstairs right now?
> Depends on who plays, and when we know I can tell you who.Come on, swami, if your so good at knowing the future give us your
best shot.
Red Sox an Patriots.
> If I win I win, and if I lose I lose. There's absolutely no
valueless theories or science involved.
You NEED to deny the science in order to perpetuate your fraud.
It's so obvious.
Huh? What did he just say?
Interestingly, the people who do WELL at sports betting and the
stock market tend to use statistical analysis techniques. The very
same thing you call nonsense.
There you go again, making up things based on your rampant
generalities that you've degenerated into using because you can't be
specific at all. Let's see, geek statistical analysis technique is
equivalent to being a good sports better and having success in the
stock market. How convenient for a computer fairy to say that. You're
also the type who has to hire one of those fraudulent Financial
Analysts to control your financial future for you. In other words,
you have more weaknesses than originally portrayed.
You're getting stuck now but I'll bail you out once again. I said
people will not consistently win unless they do exactly as I do. That
means, to the challenged here, that if they
> happen to play under the exact same circumstances as I do then
they will win, and if they don't they will not. Clear and to the
point, and if you think there's a generality there somewhere then you
won't accept that point.
That's your escape route. "Oh, gee, you must not have played
exactly like I would ...". You are such an obvious scammer.
If it is an 'escape route', then your argument is null & void. People
are told everything up front, and I charge nothing for my advice.
Unlike your fraudulent buddies who take people's money just to keep
gambling money in their pockets, I'm fair with everyone and I don't
need their money.
> Sure, if you want to analyze something to death with absolutely
no point in doing so. But you cannot factor in anything humans do to
> change what you precious statistics say SHOULD be the case.
And, what can a human do to change the output of a VP machine?
Nothing. Unless of course, you claim you can predict the future.
Wait, there's that swami thing again. You're in a box, Princess.
You tried to answer your own question in yet another attempt to talk
yourself into somehow being correct. But too bad you flunked again. I
change what the casino manager expects of me all the time. You try to
say I'm changing the output of the machine but I didn't say that. You
did because you're lost again..
> > > Get a life! That stupid bell curve has nothing to do with
results once you actually go in to play a session.
> >
> > There you go, showing your ignorance again. The bell curve
actually does contain everyones' possible results within it. And,
it shows you the likelihood of attaining said results. And, it does
it much better than the Princess could ever do.
> > > Get a life! That stupid bell curve has nothing to do with
results once you actually go in to play a session. Who cares a hoot
about "the likelihood" of this or that happening? Only a seriously
misled geek would say such an idiotic thing.
> >
> It's all a geek theory once again and it has been proven to be
wrong.Of course it has, Princess ... The fact is, it has been proven
RIGHT many times which kind of gets in the way of your scam, doesn't
it?
You certainly haven't proven anything but your ignorance over and
over here. Your constant failing has been worth the price of
admission though.
If you're trying to figure out the future then "possible results"
are the only thing us mortals can consider, Swami.
And again, YOU are the only fool trying to figure out the future. I
only care what happens WHEN it occurs - and not before or after.
Statistical analysis gone wild. You and your slide rule belong on
Jerry Springer.
> No, just the analysts, and that's why we in management have the
> opportunity to take any course we'd like when it make more sense
to do so. It's called risk--the source of every success known to man.
Yes, that is true. Management hired the analysts and they pay them
good money. Why do they do that? Clearly, not to ignore what they
produce. It's so they can reduce the risk as much as possible.
The analysts have some intrinsic value, but never when a serious
decision needs to be made that affects large profit-making. The
biggest successes I've ever seen is when we've dissed the
recommendations of those nerds in favor of a riskier approach.
> No, because you look more dumb every second when you say even a
> little. If I relied on what F-500 companies thought about me, I'd
be as neurotic as you are.Sure, Princess. Give it up. You are so behind the eight ball. You
can sit there and claim more knowledge than all the fortune 500
companies all day long and no one will believe you.
All that, and I'm simply talking about how neurotic you are.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> > Having a so-called "edge" over a casino is of no value if it
> > is 'shown' to anyone.
>
> Is this another fantasy dream of yours or are you serious? An
edge
is an edge, plain and simple.
Yeah, just like all the ninkompoops who chase casino promotions
whenever they scrape up enough cash to do so do. Casinos are the
only
entity with an edge, ever.
Sure they are, Princess. I thought you said YOU win. Isn't that an
edge? So, you are either lying about your system or lying just now
when you said "Casinos are the only entity with an edge, ever". So,
which is it?
>
> Sure it is, Princess. If it were true then lotteries would be
easy
> pickings. Hey, there's lots of big lottery winners out there.
Don't know about you, but I believe in lottery winners.
I'm waiting for you to come out with a guaranteed lottery winning
system. Couldn't be any worse than your flat earth progressive
system. You can all it the "Princess system that overcomes
120,000,000:1 odds" system.
>
> > And if you think any
> > players who labels themselves 'advantage-players' truly have
any
> sort of an 'edge' over any casino anywhere, you should be living
in
LV
>
> Who's says I'm not?An advantage player, or living in LV? Either way that makes you a
loser.
It appears you can't comprehend simple English once again. Too bad,
Princess.
>
> Actually, it's more like $17.11.Yipee! Why not make that $645.79? We can all pay the bills with a
theoretical figure!
Can't stand it when faced with the truth, Princess? Not surprising
for a gutless, slimeball coward.
> > >
> > Ding dong, there's that useless-to-video-poker bell curve
crutch
> once again. As I said above, all you can say is "If it's 99.9999%
you will lose, but if it's 100.00001% you will win".
>
> No, that's EXACTLY the opposite of what the bell curve indicates.
Put down that bottle and pay attention, Princess.Now you change your tune again. Before it was this and now it
isn't.
You sure that bell isn't ringing somewhere upstairs right now?
What I've said has been consistent all along. What you WANT to hear
is altogether different. I can't help you with your shortcomings,
Princess. So, read more closely if you want to figure it out.
>
> > Depends on who plays, and when we know I can tell you who.
>
> Come on, swami, if your so good at knowing the future give us
your
> best shot.
Red Sox an Patriots.
Home town favorites?
>
> > If I win I win, and if I lose I lose. There's absolutely no
valueless theories or science involved.
>
> You NEED to deny the science in order to perpetuate your fraud.
It's so obvious.Huh? What did he just say?
You NEED to deny the science in order to perpetuate your fraud. It's
so obvious.
>
> Interestingly, the people who do WELL at sports betting and the
stock market tend to use statistical analysis techniques. The very
same thing you call nonsense.There you go again, making up things based on your rampant
generalities that you've degenerated into using because you can't
be
specific at all. Let's see, geek statistical analysis technique is
equivalent to being a good sports better and having success in the
stock market. How convenient for a computer fairy to say that.
You're
also the type who has to hire one of those fraudulent Financial
Analysts to control your financial future for you. In other words,
you have more weaknesses than originally portrayed.
I see you're trying to change the subject again, Princess. You must
not feel too well having ALL of the fortune 500 companies using the
same statistical analysis techniques on a daily basis that you claim
are worthless. I'm not surprised. When you're caught in a lie, it's
about all you can do.
>
> > Sure, if you want to analyze something to death with absolutely
no point in doing so. But you cannot factor in anything humans do
to
> > change what you precious statistics say SHOULD be the case.
>
> And, what can a human do to change the output of a VP machine?
> Nothing. Unless of course, you claim you can predict the future.
> Wait, there's that swami thing again. You're in a box, Princess.You tried to answer your own question in yet another attempt to
talk
yourself into somehow being correct. But too bad you flunked again.
I
change what the casino manager expects of me all the time. You try
to
say I'm changing the output of the machine but I didn't say that.
You
did because you're lost again..
No, I didn't say that. However, your ramblings here TELL me exactly
what I want to know. You're completely lost and you have no idea how
to make an intelligent reply.
> > > > Get a life! That stupid bell curve has nothing to do with
> results once you actually go in to play a session.
> > >
> > > There you go, showing your ignorance again. The bell curve
> actually does contain everyones' possible results within it. And,
it shows you the likelihood of attaining said results. And, it does
it much better than the Princess could ever do.> > > > Get a life! That stupid bell curve has nothing to do with
> results once you actually go in to play a session. Who cares a
hoot
about "the likelihood" of this or that happening? Only a seriously
misled geek would say such an idiotic thing.
Or, those darn fortune 500 companies that use these same techniques
before they tackle their designated markets. Keep it up, Princess.
You look like such a fathead.
> > >
> > It's all a geek theory once again and it has been proven to be
> wrong.
>
> Of course it has, Princess ... The fact is, it has been proven
RIGHT many times which kind of gets in the way of your scam,
doesn't
it?
You certainly haven't proven anything but your ignorance over and
over here. Your constant failing has been worth the price of
admission though.
Keep on trying ... I'm sure you'll convince a couple of grade school
kids that the fortune 500 companies are all crazy.
>
> If you're trying to figure out the future then "possible results"
are the only thing us mortals can consider, Swami.And again, YOU are the only fool trying to figure out the future. I
only care what happens WHEN it occurs - and not before or after.
That's why you're such an idiot.
Statistical analysis gone wild. You and your slide rule belong on
Jerry Springer.
I suspect even Jerry Springers' production company uses statistical
analysis to determine how best to market the show. Thanks for
bringing it up.
>
> > No, just the analysts, and that's why we in management have the
> > opportunity to take any course we'd like when it make more
sense
to do so. It's called risk--the source of every success known to
man.
>
> Yes, that is true. Management hired the analysts and they pay
them
> good money. Why do they do that? Clearly, not to ignore what they
> produce. It's so they can reduce the risk as much as possible.The analysts have some intrinsic value, but never when a serious
decision needs to be made that affects large profit-making. The
biggest successes I've ever seen is when we've dissed the
recommendations of those nerds in favor of a riskier approach.
You think what you hold on a VP hand represents "large profit-
making"? You think this is comparable to the BILLION dollar decisions
that the fortune 500 companies make? I think you've gone way off the
deep end, Princess.
>
> > No, because you look more dumb every second when you say even a
> > little. If I relied on what F-500 companies thought about me,
I'd
> be as neurotic as you are.
>
> Sure, Princess. Give it up. You are so behind the eight ball. You
can sit there and claim more knowledge than all the fortune 500
companies all day long and no one will believe you.All that, and I'm simply talking about how neurotic you are.
I know. I'm talking facts and the best you can do is grade school
name calling. Put's it all in perspective, Princess.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> Yeah, just like all the ninkompoops who chase casino promotions
> whenever they scrape up enough cash to do so do. Casinos are the
only entity with an edge, ever.Sure they are, Princess. I thought you said YOU win. Isn't that an
edge? So, you are either lying about your system or lying just now
when you said "Casinos are the only entity with an edge, ever".
So, which is it?
I've written in articles many times and you've read many times that
no one, including weirdo math players and even myself, ever have an
edge over a casino. I win, as I constantly say but it doesn't seem
to penetrate the steel plate in your skull, by taking complete
advantage of the times good luck comes along. It is a simple
concept, a moneymaker, and you'll never agree to or get it. Why?
Because you can't figure out how to draw it up on paper or analyze
it on a spreadsheet.
> An advantage player, or living in LV? Either way that makes you
a loser.
> Yipee! Why not make that $645.79? We can all pay the bills with
a theoretical figure!
Can't stand it when faced with the truth, Princess? Not surprising
for a gutless, slimeball coward.
How does that stupid statement repudiate or disprove my comment? I
guess you're out of gas.
> Now you change your tune again. Before it was this and now it
isn't. You sure that bell isn't ringing somewhere upstairs right
now?
What I've said has been consistent all along. What you WANT to
hear is altogether different.
To you probably--but I don't think even you know the answer to that.
What I WANT to hear is nothing from you, because you are really a
nobody nothing, and I'm not.
Home town favorites?
From Arizona??? Guess sports isn't your bag either--just like vp.
You NEED to deny the science in order to perpetuate your fraud.
It's so obvious.
What did you just say? Deny science? In video poker? Hahaha hohoho!
There's the nerd in you yapping again.
I see you're trying to change the subject again, Princess. You
must not feel too well having ALL of the fortune 500 companies using
the same statistical analysis techniques on a daily basis that you
claim are worthless.
Who cares? You're a time waster.
No, I didn't say that. However, your ramblings here TELL me
exactly what I want to know. You're completely lost and you have no
idea how to make an intelligent reply.
"NO I DIDN'T, NO I DIDN'T"!! You're such a big baby (and I mean BIG)
when you don't have answers.
> > > > > Get a life! That stupid bell curve has nothing to do
with results once you actually go in to play a session. Who cares a
hoot about "the likelihood" of this or that happening? Only a
seriously misled geek would say such an idiotic thing.
Or, those darn fortune 500 companies that use these same
techniques before they tackle their designated markets. Keep it up,
Princess. You look like such a fathead.
We're talking video poker here, McFly, and not building bikes. Take
the dunce cap off for a change.
It's all a geek theory once again and it has been proven to be
wrong.
> >
Keep on trying ... I'm sure you'll convince a couple of grade
school kids that the fortune 500 companies are all crazy.
There you go again, leaning on some other entity when you get stuck.
> And again, YOU are the only fool trying to figure out the
future. I only care what happens WHEN it occurs - and not before or
after.
That's why you're such an idiot.
Yup, one who wins. That's usually good enough up against a nerd like
you, but I'll throw in your penchant for Indian casinos for a few
more laughs!
> Statistical analysis gone wild. You and your slide rule belong
on Jerry Springer.
I suspect even Jerry Springers' production company uses
statistical analysis to determine how best to market the show.
Thanks for bringing it up.
You'd suspect just about anything to calm yourself down....
> The analysts have some intrinsic value, but never when a serious
> decision needs to be made that affects large profit-making. The
> biggest successes I've ever seen is when we've dissed the
> recommendations of those nerds in favor of a riskier approach.You think what you hold on a VP hand represents "large profit-
making"? You think this is comparable to the BILLION dollar
decisions that the fortune 500 companies make? I think you've gone
way off the deep end, Princess.
It does compared to the investment in that hand. Obviously you've
never experienced a good win (oh, pardon me for forgetting about
that '50cent royal'), so you now lean on fortune 500 stuff.
> All that, and I'm simply talking about how neurotic you are.
I know. I'm talking facts and the best you can do is grade school
name calling. Put's it all in perspective, Princess.
You mean like nerd, computer fairy, fatboy and geek?
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> > Yeah, just like all the ninkompoops who chase casino promotions
> > whenever they scrape up enough cash to do so do. Casinos are
the
> only entity with an edge, ever.
>
> Sure they are, Princess. I thought you said YOU win. Isn't that
an
> edge? So, you are either lying about your system or lying just
now
> when you said "Casinos are the only entity with an edge, ever".
So, which is it?I've written in articles many times and you've read many times that
no one, including weirdo math players and even myself, ever have an
edge over a casino. I win, as I constantly say but it doesn't seem
to penetrate the steel plate in your skull, by taking complete
advantage of the times good luck comes along. It is a simple
concept, a moneymaker, and you'll never agree to or get it. Why?
Because you can't figure out how to draw it up on paper or analyze
it on a spreadsheet.
ROTFLMAO. It's about time you admitted the only reason you've won is
pure LUCK. Not much else to talk about.
>
> > An advantage player, or living in LV? Either way that makes you
a loser.
>
> > Yipee! Why not make that $645.79? We can all pay the bills with
a theoretical figure!
>
> Can't stand it when faced with the truth, Princess? Not
surprising
> for a gutless, slimeball coward.
How does that stupid statement repudiate or disprove my comment? I
guess you're out of gas.
It wasn't an attempt to repudiate your silly assertion. I don't care
what you think, Princess. Never will. I just present the facts.
>
> > Now you change your tune again. Before it was this and now it
> isn't. You sure that bell isn't ringing somewhere upstairs right
now?
>
> What I've said has been consistent all along. What you WANT to
hear is altogether different.To you probably--but I don't think even you know the answer to
that.
What I WANT to hear is nothing from you, because you are really a
nobody nothing, and I'm not.
Click your heels together again, Princess. Your hopes and desires are
here for all to see. Too bad they will never materialize.
> Home town favorites?
From Arizona??? Guess sports isn't your bag either--just like vp.
From your college days, dimwit? Or, was the reference to BC another
lie!
>
> You NEED to deny the science in order to perpetuate your fraud.
It's so obvious.What did you just say? Deny science? In video poker? Hahaha hohoho!
Exactly what I meant. Come on, say it again, Princess. The earth is
flat.
>
> I see you're trying to change the subject again, Princess. You
must not feel too well having ALL of the fortune 500 companies
using
the same statistical analysis techniques on a daily basis that you
claim are worthless.Who cares? You're a time waster.
Only if you continue to perpetuate your fraud. Give it up.
> No, I didn't say that. However, your ramblings here TELL me
exactly what I want to know. You're completely lost and you have no
idea how to make an intelligent reply."NO I DIDN'T, NO I DIDN'T"!! You're such a big baby (and I mean
BIG)
when you don't have answers.
Keep it up. You are really losing it now. I noticed you snipped your
own ramblings. Couldn't stand them either, Princess?
>
> > > > > > Get a life! That stupid bell curve has nothing to do
with results once you actually go in to play a session. Who cares a
> hoot about "the likelihood" of this or that happening? Only a
seriously misled geek would say such an idiotic thing.
>
> Or, those darn fortune 500 companies that use these same
techniques before they tackle their designated markets. Keep it up,
Princess. You look like such a fathead.We're talking video poker here, McFly, and not building bikes. Take
the dunce cap off for a change.
>
It's all a geek theory once again and it has been proven to be
wrong.
> > >
> Keep on trying ... I'm sure you'll convince a couple of grade
school kids that the fortune 500 companies are all crazy.There you go again, leaning on some other entity when you get stuck.
I have to admit those fortune 500 companies are a real good "entity"
to lean on. Much better than the house of toothpicks your flat earth
system is built on.
>
> > And again, YOU are the only fool trying to figure out the
future. I only care what happens WHEN it occurs - and not before or
after.
>
> That's why you're such an idiot.Yup, one who wins. That's usually good enough up against a nerd
like
you, but I'll throw in your penchant for Indian casinos for a few
more laughs!
You mean the very same Indian casino that cheated me out of ...
wait, I won $2200 yesterday. I sure hope they keep up the cheatin'.
>
> > Statistical analysis gone wild. You and your slide rule belong
on Jerry Springer.
>
> I suspect even Jerry Springers' production company uses
statistical analysis to determine how best to market the show.
Thanks for bringing it up.You'd suspect just about anything to calm yourself down....
No, just to show how stupid you are. And, what's more, I'm probably
right.
>
> > The analysts have some intrinsic value, but never when a
serious
> > decision needs to be made that affects large profit-making. The
> > biggest successes I've ever seen is when we've dissed the
> > recommendations of those nerds in favor of a riskier approach.
>
> You think what you hold on a VP hand represents "large profit-
> making"? You think this is comparable to the BILLION dollar
decisions that the fortune 500 companies make? I think you've gone
way off the deep end, Princess.It does compared to the investment in that hand. Obviously you've
never experienced a good win (oh, pardon me for forgetting about
that '50cent royal'), so you now lean on fortune 500 stuff.
Keep scrambling, Princess. This is close to the most idiotic reply
you've come up yet, and you've had some real idiotic ones. You think
a single VP hand is equivalent to BILLION dollar decisions? ROTFLMAO.
>
> > All that, and I'm simply talking about how neurotic you are.
>
> I know. I'm talking facts and the best you can do is grade school
> name calling. Put's it all in perspective, Princess.You mean like nerd, computer fairy, fatboy and geek?
Yes. More examples of the best intellect you have to offer, Princess.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
ROTFLMAO. It's about time you admitted the only reason you've won
is pure LUCK. Not much else to talk about.
Knew you couldn't connect the dots on your spreadsheets. Here's
another thorn in your side. I just got in from a 1-day trip to LV,
and I won $30. Another professional lesson on how to take complete
advantage of when luck shines upon you. Yes, I was down over $2000 at
one point, and the best vp player in the world came home with $1030
profit. What's that--you can't add right? Well, my name was called
out at the RIO and they handed me a grand. You would have stayed and
fed the bill feeders for hours until that was all gone.
Typical "expert". I scadadled. Typical "winner".
I just present the facts.
I haven't seen one fact yet. It's all in that flip-flop mind of yours.
Click your heels together again, Princess. Your hopes and desires
are here for all to see. Too bad they will never materialize.
Yeah, no one cares that you're a nobody nothing. I'm what they care
about.
From your college days, dimwit? Or, was the reference to BC another
lie!
Boston was ot my hometown, wombat.
> Who cares? You're a time waster.
Only if you continue to perpetuate your fraud. Give it up.
No, go right ahead and write that nonsense that no one, including me,
doesn't read. It's like vp articles that Dancer or Fromme write. All
statisticsal BS and what-ifs. No one reads them. As soon as they see
numbers galore then they turn the page. That's why I'm the most
popular columnist GT's ever had. Truth and experiences. That's what
people want. That's what I want to see YOU learn how to do.
> There you go again, leaning on some other entity when you get
stuck.
I have to admit those fortune 500 companies are a real
good "entity" to lean on. Much better than the house of toothpicks
your flat earth system is built on.
I lean on something? Another make-believe statistic. Better stick
with your nonsense about Fortune 500 or 600 or whatever that
meaningless thing is.
> Yup, one who wins. That's usually good enough up against a nerd
like you, but I'll throw in your penchant for Indian casinos for a
few more laughs!
You mean the very same Indian casino that cheated me out of ...
wait, I won $2200 yesterday. I sure hope they keep up the cheatin'.
Goody. A win for the nerd!! Yipee!!! And how was the smoking? What
about the delicious fry breads? Do they have a caricature of Custer
hog-tied in the men's bathroom too. Hahaha Hehehe!! You're a thousand
laughs!
Keep scrambling, Princess. This is close to the most idiotic reply
you've come up yet, and you've had some real idiotic ones. You
think a single VP hand is equivalent to BILLION dollar decisions?
ROTFLMAO.
What one person thinks is significant another may consider it noise.
Not everyone listens to geek theories. In fact, if we did then we'd
all be speaking German today.
> You mean like nerd, computer fairy, fatboy and geek?
Yes. More examples of the best intellect you have to offer,
Princess.
Oh, I forgot your favorite: DICKHEAD!! Hahaha Hehehe!!! What's that
moniker--LYMOAFATFATFAT??
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> ROTFLMAO. It's about time you admitted the only reason you've won
is pure LUCK. Not much else to talk about.Knew you couldn't connect the dots on your spreadsheets. Here's
another thorn in your side. I just got in from a 1-day trip to LV,
and I won $30.
I'm breathless.
Another professional lesson on how to take complete
advantage of when luck shines upon you. Yes, I was down over $2000
at
one point, and the best vp player in the world came home with $1030
profit. What's that--you can't add right? Well, my name was called
out at the RIO and they handed me a grand.
This from the man who ridicules promotions. Maybe some of what the
Queen says is finally getting though to the Princess.
You would have stayed and
fed the bill feeders for hours until that was all gone.
Typical "expert". I scadadled. Typical "winner".
I may have stayed, just like I did on Monday after getting ahead
$2000 with a RF. I ended up another $200 ahead. When playing POSITIVE
games it doesn't matter when you leave. The last time I had a RF in
the first 1/2 hour I made another $2300 before I left (without
another RF). Your theories are worthless, as are you, Princess.
>
> > Who cares? You're a time waster.
>
> Only if you continue to perpetuate your fraud. Give it up.No, go right ahead and write that nonsense that no one, including
me,
doesn't read.
It's been pretty obvious all along that reading is not one of your
strong points.
It's like vp articles that Dancer or Fromme write. All
statisticsal BS and what-ifs. No one reads them.
I suspect they don't get a lot of reading. However, the content is
truthful unlike the lies you spread.
As soon as they see
numbers galore then they turn the page. That's why I'm the most
popular columnist GT's ever had. Truth and experiences. That's what
people want. That's what I want to see YOU learn how to do.
Lie like you do, Princess? Not a chance.
> > Yup, one who wins. That's usually good enough up against a nerd
> like you, but I'll throw in your penchant for Indian casinos for
a
few more laughs!
>
> You mean the very same Indian casino that cheated me out of ...
> wait, I won $2200 yesterday. I sure hope they keep up the
cheatin'.
Goody. A win for the nerd!! Yipee!!! And how was the smoking? What
about the delicious fry breads? Do they have a caricature of Custer
hog-tied in the men's bathroom too. Hahaha Hehehe!! You're a
thousand
laughs!
Smoking wasn't bad since it's not all that busy on a Monday. The room
and food were free. I suspect you believe the casino is some small
place with low ceilings. Well, it's actually just as nice as most LV
locals casinos and ALL the Laughlin casinos you love to visit. It's
got a championship golf course as well. This is another example,
Princess, of where you spout off without having a clue.
>
> Keep scrambling, Princess. This is close to the most idiotic
reply
> you've come up yet, and you've had some real idiotic ones. You
think a single VP hand is equivalent to BILLION dollar decisions?
ROTFLMAO.What one person thinks is significant another may consider it
noise.
Not everyone listens to geek theories.
If they want to win they should. If they want to be scammed by your
worthless theories then they take their own chances. I'll stay with
the techniques used by the fortune 500 companies over your proven (by
Reid) fraudulent systems.
>
> > You mean like nerd, computer fairy, fatboy and geek?
>
> Yes. More examples of the best intellect you have to offer,
Princess.Oh, I forgot your favorite: DICKHEAD!! Hahaha Hehehe!!! What's that
moniker--LYMOAFATFATFAT??
More examples of your 3rd grade intellect. Keep em' coming, Princess.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
I'm breathless.
Careful. At your age that's not a good idea.
> Another professional lesson on how to take complete
> advantage of when luck shines upon you. Yes, I was down over
$2000 at one point, and the best vp player in the world came home
with $1030 profit. What's that--you can't add right? Well, my name
was called out at the RIO and they handed me a grand.
This from the man who ridicules promotions. Maybe some of what the
Queen says is finally getting though to the Princess.
Hahaha, I was waiting for that! You'll never see me play in
tournaments, fill out ridiculous drawing tickets, go to stupid
tournament banquets that are all better suited for old cows than
normal people, or get roped in to play by a promo. I stayed 1 nite
there but played zero, and entries were all automatic from past play.
And I guarantee, I was the ONLY participant who didn't play. The rest
of the addicts were glued to machines even during the drawings. My
play was at the HRH, Westin, Tuscany, Bellagio & Mandalay Bay--quite
a different line-up from your Indian habit, no? BTW--no Queen
present. She was probably having mechanical problems with that frugal
junk mini-van of hers.
> You would have stayed and
> fed the bill feeders for hours until that was all gone.
> Typical "expert". I scadadled. Typical "winner".I may have stayed, just like I did on Monday after getting ahead
$2000 with a RF. I ended up another $200 ahead. When playing
POSITIVE games it doesn't matter when you leave. The last time I had
a RF in first 1/2 hour I made another $2300 before I left (without
another RF). Your theories are worthless, as are you, Princess.
More chest pounding to go along with story-telling. It's a treat to
see you won. I guess you would have lost on negative games, so you
are really a true genius--one of a kind. Better watch those 50c
machines though. you're a quarter player and we wouldn't want to see
you dump every retirement check into an Indian burial ground.
> It's like vp articles that Dancer or Fromme write. All
> statisticsal BS and what-ifs. No one reads them.I suspect they don't get a lot of reading. However, the content is
truthful unlike the lies you spread.
More theories from you. What a life.
> Goody. A win for the nerd!! Yipee!!! And how was the smoking?
What about the delicious fry breads? Do they have a caricature of
Custer hog-tied in the men's bathroom too. Hahaha Hehehe!! You're a
thousand laughs!
Smoking wasn't bad since it's not all that busy on a Monday.
Big surprise. An Indian joint that cheats everyone out of their money
over the weekends isn't busy on a Monday.
The room and food were free. I suspect you believe the casino is
some small place with low ceilings. Well, it's actually just as nice
as most LV locals casinos and ALL the Laughlin casinos you love to
visit. It's got a championship golf course as well. This is another
example, Princess, of where you spout off without having a clue.
Just the way you write this tells me how addicted you are to the
dump. It's like you're a walikng advertisement all pumped up for the
days in-between visits where you finally won something and you have
to let the whole wide world know what a truly wonderful place it is!
And you can't stop talking about it since you believe your habit has
finally come through for you and yours, making up for the beatings
you always take. What a happy life it must be! Why, it'll last
FOREVER!!!
> Not everyone listens to geek theories.
If they want to win they should. If they want to be scammed by your
worthless theories then they take their own chances. I'll stay with
the techniques used by the fortune 500 companies over your proven
(by Reid) fraudulent systems.
But I just won $30 with my 'fraudulent system'. Doesn't that say
ANYTHING to you? (Careful, figure it out first).
> Oh, I forgot your favorite: DICKHEAD!! Hahaha Hehehe!!! What's
that moniker--LYMOAFATFATFAT??
More examples of your 3rd grade intellect. Keep em' coming,
Princess.
Ok here's a good one: One of the bosses' names I've had along the way
was Dick Zimlich. He was a weirdo math fairy just like you, who
didn't believe even what he saw without being able to draw it up on a
piece of paper or a spreadsheet. We used to call him 'Zim Dicklick'
behind his back. I think 'Dicklick' fits you perfectly, but out of
respect I won't call you Zim.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
>
> > Another professional lesson on how to take complete
> > advantage of when luck shines upon you. Yes, I was down over
$2000 at one point, and the best vp player in the world came home
with $1030 profit. What's that--you can't add right? Well, my name
was called out at the RIO and they handed me a grand.
>
> This from the man who ridicules promotions. Maybe some of what
the
> Queen says is finally getting though to the Princess.
Hahaha, I was waiting for that! You'll never see me play in
tournaments, fill out ridiculous drawing tickets, go to stupid
tournament banquets that are all better suited for old cows than
normal people, or get roped in to play by a promo. I stayed 1 nite
there but played zero, and entries were all automatic from past
play.
And I guarantee, I was the ONLY participant who didn't play.
In other words, I'm right on.
The rest
of the addicts were glued to machines even during the drawings. My
play was at the HRH, Westin, Tuscany, Bellagio & Mandalay Bay--
quite
a different line-up from your Indian habit, no?
No. You left out the other casinos I visited this year. Tuscany,
Sams' Town, Fiesta, GVR, Monte Lago, Stratosphere, Barleys, Sunset
and Boulder Stations, Rampart and the Rio. By the way, Tuscany has
the best OEJs in LV and they have worse paytables than the Indians.
> > You would have stayed and
> > fed the bill feeders for hours until that was all gone.
> > Typical "expert". I scadadled. Typical "winner".
>
> I may have stayed, just like I did on Monday after getting ahead
> $2000 with a RF. I ended up another $200 ahead. When playing
POSITIVE games it doesn't matter when you leave. The last time I
had
a RF in first 1/2 hour I made another $2300 before I left (without
> another RF). Your theories are worthless, as are you, Princess.More chest pounding to go along with story-telling.
I let the facts speak for themselves.
It's a treat to
see you won. I guess you would have lost on negative games, so you
are really a true genius--one of a kind.
No, Princess, there are hundreds of other advantage players around.
> > It's like vp articles that Dancer or Fromme write. All
> > statisticsal BS and what-ifs. No one reads them.
>
> I suspect they don't get a lot of reading. However, the content
is
> truthful unlike the lies you spread.
More theories from you. What a life.
Can't deny the facts, Princess? That's good for a change.
>
> > Goody. A win for the nerd!! Yipee!!! And how was the smoking?
What about the delicious fry breads? Do they have a caricature of
Custer hog-tied in the men's bathroom too. Hahaha Hehehe!! You're a
> thousand laughs!
>
> Smoking wasn't bad since it's not all that busy on a Monday.
The room and food were free. I suspect you believe the casino is
some small place with low ceilings. Well, it's actually just as
nice
as most LV locals casinos and ALL the Laughlin casinos you love to
visit. It's got a championship golf course as well. This is another
example, Princess, of where you spout off without having a clue.Just the way you write this tells me how addicted you are to the
dump. It's like you're a walikng advertisement all pumped up for
the
days in-between visits where you finally won something and you have
to let the whole wide world know what a truly wonderful place it
is!
And you can't stop talking about it since you believe your habit
has
finally come through for you and yours, making up for the beatings
you always take. What a happy life it must be! Why, it'll last
FOREVER!!!
Do you ever say anything intelligent, Princess? If you condemn me for
visiting a nice casino then you condemn yourself and every other
gambler in the world. You can't claim I'm an addict without calling
every gambler an addict. Oh, wait, you DO call every other gambler an
addict unless they follow your Princess system. It's one of your
attributes that clearly shows how sick you are.
>
> > Not everyone listens to geek theories.
>
> If they want to win they should. If they want to be scammed by
your
> worthless theories then they take their own chances. I'll stay
with
> the techniques used by the fortune 500 companies over your proven
(by Reid) fraudulent systems.But I just won $30 with my 'fraudulent system'. Doesn't that say
ANYTHING to you? (Careful, figure it out first).
NO. I see gamblers win all the time playing no system of any kind.
>
> > Oh, I forgot your favorite: DICKHEAD!! Hahaha Hehehe!!! What's
that moniker--LYMOAFATFATFAT??
>
> More examples of your 3rd grade intellect. Keep em' coming,
Princess.Ok here's a good one: One of the bosses' names I've had along the
way
was Dick Zimlich. He was a weirdo math fairy just like you, who
didn't believe even what he saw without being able to draw it up on
a
piece of paper or a spreadsheet. We used to call him 'Zim Dicklick'
behind his back. I think 'Dicklick' fits you perfectly, but out of
respect I won't call you Zim.
Keep them coming, Princess. More proof of your childish behavior. I'm
sure all the 3rd graders are getting a kick out of you.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
No, Princess, there are hundreds of other advantage players around.
Of course there are. I'd even bet there are thousands of you.
No other explanation of why casinos continue to flourish could
possibly be given except that it is because of the existence
of you people who really do believe you have an advantage.
> Hahaha, I was waiting for that! You'll never see me play in
> tournaments, fill out ridiculous drawing tickets, go to stupid
> tournament banquets that are all better suited for old cows than
> normal people, or get roped in to play by a promo. I stayed 1
nite there but played zero, and entries were all automatic from past
play. And I guarantee, I was the ONLY participant who didn't play.
In other words, I'm right on.
I don't think you're reading the same page I wrote. The only time
you're right on is at the dinner table.
No. You left out the other casinos I visited this year. Tuscany,
Sams' Town, Fiesta, GVR, Monte Lago, Stratosphere, Barleys, Sunset
and Boulder Stations, Rampart and the Rio. By the way, Tuscany has
the best OEJs in LV and they have worse paytables than the Indians.
Tuscany pay tables aren't what's important. They're a big deal only
to neurotic geeks. I'm $28k ahead there on 8/5 BP and DDB. Think of
that when you search for these stupid oej's--and don't be saying you
don't care, because the envy glows whenever you respond to my
prowess. GVR is out of your league. Strato is for queers on the
prowl. Barley's has good beer but the worst pizza in town, and I
believe the pizza is along your line of interest. Boulder Station is
the next slummiest Station to Palace. A geek like you likely gets
lost in Rampart. And the Rio? Waaaaaay out of your class, although
it's a good place for an ugly puss to hide by blending in with all
the cuties in the place.
> > I may have stayed, just like I did on Monday after getting
ahead $2000 with a RF. I ended up another $200 ahead. When playing
> POSITIVE games it doesn't matter when you leave. The last time I
had a RF in first 1/2 hour I made another $2300 before I left
(without > another RF). Your theories are worthless, as are you,
Princess.
The only reason you stayed is to get your fix until either you tired
or your wife nagged the addict to leave because she or you were broke
and your ATM cards didn't work.
I let the facts speak for themselves.
Like a geek, I say 'prove them'. Until then, you are only a foolish
theorist who writes down that which makes you feel good.
No, Princess, there are hundreds of other advantage players around.
So I've heard. And so I've often ridiculed....with pride.
> Just the way you write this tells me how addicted you are to the
> dump. It's like you're a walikng advertisement all pumped up for
the days in-between visits where you finally won something and you
have to let the whole wide world know what a truly wonderful place it
is! And you can't stop talking about it since you believe your
habit has finally come through for you and yours, making up for the
beatings you always take. What a happy life it must be! Why, it'll
last FOREVER!!!
Do you ever say anything intelligent, Princess? If you condemn me
for visiting a nice casino then you condemn yourself and every other
gambler in the world.
A nice casino? Hahaha you're kidding, right? You must pee Indian red!
The only reason Indian casinos exist is for revenge. They know they
don't have to play by the rules, so they count on a bewildered,
unaware-because-of-no-brains customer base of addicts like you guys,
who have the burning need to believe they're fair so you can justify
the fact that you have to play there all the time. The condemnation
goes that far, and it is well deserved. I say the same thing to the
poor fools who go to the joints around here regularly. They know it,
and they agree I'm 'right on'.
You can't claim I'm an addict without calling every gambler an
addict. Oh, wait, you DO call every other gambler an addict unless
they follow your Princess system. It's one of your attributes that
clearly shows how sick you are.
Wrong,and if you've been reading you'd see how dumb you are to
support the type of gambling that you do. Stick to trips to Nevada
and see if you folks can just drive by the Indian joints when you
travel. I'll bet you can't.
> But I just won $30 with my 'fraudulent system'. Doesn't that say
> ANYTHING to you? (Careful, figure it out first).NO. I see gamblers win all the time playing no system of any kind.
You see addicts at Indian casinos win at a machine usint either no
method or the dufus expert-play method and then disappear to another
machine. It's the same strategy as locals use everywhere. When they
win they let people know around them, but they hit another casino on
the way home and that you'll never hear a word about. It's
called 'pathetic behavior'.
> Ok here's a good one: One of the bosses' names I've had along the
way was Dick Zimlich. He was a weirdo math fairy just like you, who
> didn't believe even what he saw without being able to draw it up
on a piece of paper or a spreadsheet. We used to call him 'Zim
Dicklick' behind his back. I think 'Dicklick' fits you perfectly, but
out of respect I won't call you Zim.
Keep them coming, Princess. More proof of your childish behavior.
I'm sure all the 3rd graders are getting a kick out of you.
Ill leave it in just for you, Zim!
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "bonuspokergod"
<bonuspokergod@y...> wrote:
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> No, Princess, there are hundreds of other advantage players
around.
Of course there are. I'd even bet there are thousands of you.
No other explanation of why casinos continue to flourish could
possibly be given except that it is because of the existence
of you people who really do believe you have an advantage.
Casinos flourish because of the MILLIONS of players who play for
recreation only. They have no system whatsoever. That's the other
explanation that also happens to be a FACT.
Such a brilliant answer, Mr. Wizard. You and your made-up facts are a
hoot to behold. Who's self-promoting website did you get THAT
information from? Bilbo Jazbo, Stanford Wrong, Bob 'gimmee your
money' Dancer, Dan 'pay me' Paymar, 'Reid my lips Reid', Skippy 'Skip-
a-payment-and-buy-access-to-my-website' Hughes, or the Frugal 'phony
as a 3 dollar bill' Gambler? Seems you just can't let go of the fact
that most video poker players believe themselves to be so-called
advantage players just like you foolishly label yourself as, or else
they just wouldn't play. Casinos don't flourish on Mr. & Mrs. tourist
who have a drink at the bar while dropping 20 bucks. They grow
exceedingly fast because of idiot gamblers such as you and your Queen
and the millions of others you mention and as she ropes in with her
underhanded sales pitches, who all go in believing they hold a
mythical advantage over the casino and then get their lunches handed
to them in the process. And some of you are even stupid and addicted
enough to play at Indian casinos, where you're pretend 'advantage'
has been absorbed by the tribes long ago with their cheating as they
scalp one after another after another.
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:
Casinos flourish because of the MILLIONS of players who play for
recreation only. They have no system whatsoever. That's the other
explanation that also happens to be a FACT.