--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>
wrote:
> What jaunts to what casino up where? I love it when you try to
change the subject. It demonstates an admittance of failure.
You do. There's 2 subjects here: 1. Your 'advantage player'
addiction
to video poker and why you lose all the time. &
OK. Now I'm at 8 RFs in less than 40 days. During this period I'm
over 7K ahead. I don't think that qualifies as "lose all the time".
It's what being an advantage player is all about.
2. Your sour-grapes
whining over GWB's historic win that you'll never get over as a
crying liberal pacifist.
Move on ...
>
> Hmmm. I wonder who copied who in the use of "translation". In
this
> case I simply threw back your assertions to show you how
ridiculous
> you've become. It's getting to you, isn't it?
This is where you use the word 'whom'--although it's obviously true
they don't teach SW people common sense at any point along the way.
Now you're copying me for saying you copied me. Kind of like the
whily little kid you used to be, right?
As usual, I just relay the facts. It's getting to you, isn't it?
>
> Clearly, the fact that I am a professional gets to you, doesn't
it?
You're a has-been, big difference. I'm a has-been EE also, as well
as
a has-been MBA.
You can add has-been gambler. Or, possibly, never-was.
However, TODAY is what counts, and I'm the
professional while you are in your declining years with nothing but
fading memories. THAT's what's a-hurtin'
Nope, not in the least. See above. I think the fact that I and other
advantage players continually make money while you lost is what makes
you so jealous.
> And, the best you can do, once again, is praise yourself.
Everyone
> knows that's because absolutely no one else would do it. Your
> panicing again, Rob.
When your the best at something that ticks a whiner off, you keep
it
up.
Are you talking about me now? Thanks.
>
> > You forgot? I'm the one with fame and legend here, while you
are
> > caught up with living in the past. Hurts a little, doesn't it?
You should have prepared for old age a bit better 'back then' don't
you think?
>
> The panic continues ..
Yes, I can see.......
It's about time.
>
> > Understanding means absolutely nothing without success. I
proved
> that 1990-1996. Today, to your chagrin, I am the best player
who's
ever played the game, hands down.
>
> The panic continues ...
....as you run out of things to blabber.
Nothing else is required. The facts speak for themselves.
>
> > All challengers to that, including your
> > hero Bob Dancer, have been made to eat crow. So unless you walk
on water, you can only dream of the success I've had. And unless
you
> > walk around with a constant hard-on all day long, leave your
wet
> > dreams alone.
>
> This is fantastic. Everyone gets to see the real Rob.
Correcto, while no one gets to see the real you until I tell the
truth about you. Super-Duper!
Hmmm. So far everything you've said about me has been proven false.
Could it get any better? Now, your bringing up your own errors.
>
> > You'd conjure up anything to make believe something that you
don't understand is true to your way of wishing. Reid is an idiot
that you know nothing about, and he certainly hasn't any expertise
in
> winning vp strategies.
>
> Actually, math is the game and his proof demonstates you are a
fraud.
Same old nonsense. You don't understand something and can't figure
it
out, so you bring in another nebulous personality. Just a bit on
the
weak side....
No, just more proof. However, what I've said previously is all that
is required for anyone with common sense.
>
> > This is the jist of your argument, and the rest of your babble
is
> of no concern to a pro player.
>
> Translation. Even my simple logic went WAY over Rob's simple
> intellect.
'Simple'...You said it.
And I'l' say it again. Rob's simple intellect. It's interesting that
your would appreciate being called a simpleton.
>
> > you conveniently ignore the large winners that come along
>
> I haven't ignored anything. I've simply related facts. You are
the
> one who continually ignores them. Have I mentioned before that
your
> personal results mean NOTHING. I'm discussing your system, it
either stands on its' merits or it doesn't. In this case, it
doesn't.
You purposely ignore large winners, because you can't understand
that
they do happen when your math says they should not.
The math says nothing of the sort. Anyone can have large winners at
any time. That is simply another fact.
You keep whining
that my personal results mean nothing, when that's they ONLY really
important issue to me, and you know that. Your constant frustration
comes from your inability to grasp onto the facts as presented. In
high school I've seen nerds bend their slide rules over their
pointed
heads because of such irritability.
You always revert to name-calling when you have nothing intelligent
to say. It's so obvious. The only issue I'll ever discuss with anyone
is whether a system works or not. It's not about YOU. I don't care
whether you win or lose.
>
> > but you keep making believe
> > i'm doing this for millions of years. Get real.
>
> Nope. I don't care what you do or when you do it. I'm just
stating
> proven facts.
You've never stated any clear facts--just conjectures and wishful
thinking due to a lack of understanding.
Let me repeat what I stated just a couple of posts ago. I'll try to
make it even simpler for your simple mind.
1) The overall results of YOUR progressive system can be broken down
as the sum of your results at all N levels of the progression. I
don't care whether you keep track of these results or not.
Are you with me so far? Hope that wasn't too complicated. All I
really said is addition works. If you disagree with 1), state why.
2) The results at ANY level (call it X) in your progression is no
different then the results of ANY person who plays single level VP.
If they play on negative machines then, over time, their results will
approach the ER of their ability on these machines, that is, they
will lose. There will always be a few lucky people who win, but the
vast majority will lose (this is what the casinos are banking on).
I hope this is still clear. Nothing too challenging here.
3) Since I didn't specify any pre-conditions on X. Statement 2)
applies to any and all levels in the progression. Finally, due to 1)
you are summing negative numbers which always yields a negative
result.
Can you find a single unproven conjecture here? Nope, it's really
just that simple.
>
> > I take advantage of it every time it comes
> > along because I've set goals
>
> Then you ARE admitting you control luck through setting goals.
Thank you for claiming the impossible. I think we can now all agree
that Rob is a fraud. QED.
Huh? Making believe of something out of nothing again?? You do have
trouble with words....
Nope. We all "take advantage" of luck when it comes along.
Unfortunately, there's no way to control when it will happen.
When you say you "allow luck to happen". You are simply trying to
wordsmith your way around saying you control luck. It has a softer
sound but it means EXACTLY the same thing. "Allow" means exactly the
same as "control" in this context because it requires an action on
your part to achieve the desired result.
Since the only way around my proof that your system can't work is to
claim a mysterious side-effect (allowing luck to happen), you have
done exactly that. This is a common practice among scammers. It is
obvious to anyone who cares to think about it, that your system is a
fraud and you are nothing but a two-bit scammer.
QED.
···
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote: