> > > The simple part is you. He's made claims and I've made
claims.
> >
> > Not on this forum. Only you have made claims. I think it's now
all
> > too obvious that you don't even believe your lie. Thanks.
>
> So now, because little dicky just woke up and is trying
desperately to 'belong' to something, betting means nothing unless
it's done here! HAHAHA!
LMAO. Trying to change the subject again? This is so easy.
Seems not. You want the spotlight (gee, where's that come from) but
you missed the bus. It left long ago and WITHOUT you!!
> > > > > Lesson to
> > > > > little dicky #46,597---He said I don't win and he wanted
to
> bet me on that as well as the fact that he does win.
> > >
> > > > Stick to the present, not something that happen years ago.
> > >
> > > Or a few months ago??
> >
> > Lie. Give us a reference.
>
> Read my articles from July. You'll have all the hurt you can
handle there.
I don't read a con mans' psycho-babble. I've told you that many
times but I guess you can't read.
'Give me references'--you gots them! Good enough for a hundred
thousand people to read. Oh, but you're an AP--it only happens
to 'the other guys'!!
> > > You're still trying to belong where you just
> > > don't belong. Get over it.
> >
> > I can't get over something that is only a fantasy in your sick
mind.
>
> Denial ALWAYS comes before the act of getting over it.More psycho-babble.
More denial.
> Is that from your left hand or the right? If I know I'll win both
> sides then exactly how does this hedging apply??There's only one side, your claim, your failure to back it up, your
use of more psycho-babble to hide behind. LMAO.
??? You mind saying that in English??
Lie, I'm way smarter than you and prove it every day. Just the fact
> >you keep copying my writing techniques is proof enough.
> > >
> > > Yup, you're one feared writer allright!
> >
> > Evidently. Imitation is the ... (you know the rest)
>
> ??? Another dickyism??Don't worry your petty little head, everyone else got it.
But gee, you're addressing ME!
> > GRANDIOSE SELF-WORTH -- a grossly inflated view of one's
abilities
> > and self-worth, self-assured, opinionated, cocky, a braggart.
> > Psychopaths are arrogant people who believe they are superior
human
> > beings.
>
> Oh, you've finally followed up your statement above that
said "I'm way smarter than you"!! Tally-ho!!
I like to throw in a fact or two along the way. Oh, and thanks for
making it so obvious with your ???.
???
> > > about the 5-yr. old who does the same thing as an adult when
a
> car approaches--they must all be MATHEMATICAL GENIUSES like you!!
> >
> > I can't believe you would actually post this nonsense. There's
a reason good parents don't let small children play near streets.
>
> If you had had any children you'd know that a 5-yr. old is well
aware of what to do when he sees cars coming. And he doesn't need
to whip out the slide rule first!
It appears Robbie doesn't understand simple logic. Does the child
run away when he sees a parked car? What is the difference and what
exactly goes on in the brain? Let me help you out ... movement,
which is a mathematically describeable event. If you remember I said
it had a basis in mathematics. This is way too easy.
Here's a clue for you to learn from: It's sooo simple. Parked cars
aren't a threat. Moving ones are. At 5 the kid has apparently the
same clue as you about what's going on.
> > > > > You're so hung up on yourself and the big deal you never
> > > > > were that you associate every action with math. You're
> clearly misled and as far away from it all as one can possibly
get.
> > > > Lie, another invention that has no basis in fact. Simply a
> better understanding of how things really work lets me point out
your idiotic statements.
I think you just cornered that market on your last feeble try.
> > >
> > > Um, that's why there's a term called 'common sense' Mr.
> Wizard.....
> >
> > It's called language, common sense - "sound and prudent but
often
> > unsophisticated judgment". For ages it was common sense to
believe
> > the earth was flat and the center of the universe. Then,
science
> > changed it all.
>
> EXACTLY what they'll be saying 100 years from now when a few more
> geniuses like me come along and confirm not only was my book
right-on---but every one of my articles were so clearly relevant that
I may get a noble prize for enlightening people on how the brain is
supposed to work!
GRANDIOSE SELF-WORTH -- a grossly inflated view of one's abilities
and self-worth, self-assured, opinionated, cocky, a braggart.
Psychopaths are arrogant people who believe they are superior human
beings.
PS. The only future you, and anything you've written, will have is
to be laughed at by everyone else.
I could be dumb like you and say "Gimme a fact to support that" but
I'll just say take care of yourself, stay out of the casinos 'almost
daily' and stay alive a few more years to see it all unfold in front
of your eyes (if you can still see after all the vp playing that is).
Being superior is just the start.....
> > > It doesn't require your geeky 'basis in math' and the math
> wouldn't help the normal human being anyway. Most 'brains' are
capable of creating better ways than simple math allows for.
> >
> > Lie. Normal brains are wired to do associative activities. Even
our
> > understanding of math is through association. Brains do not
create
> > better ways to do anything. Brains DISCOVER ways to do things
that
> > are already described mathematically at their most basic level.
> That
> > is why brains are not "capable of creating better ways than
simple
> > math allows for". Math describes the universe and brains are
part
> of
> > that universe. You're simple minded statements show an immense
lack
> > of knowledge.
>
> Yup, you're onto something allright! This morning when I took my
dump I had that 'mathematical feeling' just before it came-a-
blasting out!!
Which ear?
The one hooked up to your computer.
> But really, you're a victim of your own neurosis. Brains are the
> ultimate discovery vehicle and the creator of computers as well
as everything else.
I think discover is the better word.
There's that thinking again..... What'd I tell you about trying that!
> Saying the issue was 'already described
> mathematically at its most basic level' is not only condescending
to every human who's ever livedNo, it's just the facts.
You neither have nor have shown facts on that. You're deep into your
theories again, and when you do that it becomes scary. The make
believe starts and you'll say just about anything.
> --it's making believe the very first
> things to have entered this world were due to magic.No, are you really this dense? I simply stated that every potential
thing in this universe exists whether we discover it or not. Pretty
much the opposite of "magic".
That's odd. Every 'potential thing' EXISTS?? You mean like the 2009
Chevy?? HAHAHAHA!!! Go back to that think tank you make believe you
visit and recharge your batteries!!
> My left nut is
> part of the universe. Mathematically describe that!Easy. It consists of specific cells, which are made up of
molecules, which are made up of elements, which are made up of basic
particles. The cellular processes are all describeable
mathematically. This is way too easy.
Just as I thought--reashing until the straws fall. I
said "Mathematically describe that" not make up some biological
masterbation followed by "it's all described mathematically. I
believe you'd best put a halt to your foolishness here. It's
embarrassing watching you try to walk thru quicksand.
>
> > > that's why the
> > > brain is far more the complex entity than any computer ever
will
> > be.
> >
> > No, it's just a different computer which will be duplicated
when
> our brains discover all the mechanisms. Your psycho brain
included.
>
> So you believe we'll create a 'mechanical brain' capable of
exactly the same things a human brain is. HAHAHA!!! Only a nerd could
love that one.
It won't be mechanical, it will be electronic or biologic. It won't
be "exactly" the same as a human brain because all human brains are
different (especially yours). However, we will come very close to
duplicating most of the functions. It appears you think the world
is controlled by "magic" if you think we won't eventually duplicate
the brain.
They tried that with Frankenstein. Quite a theory! Is the mummy up
next??
> > Your responses demonstrate a very simple understanding of the
world
> > around you. I suspect all the wasted brain cells dedicated to
lying
> > and fantasizing is responsible.
>
> The ultimate compliment from one who is on the slide in a debate.I think everyone can see Robbie, the psycho-boy, is the
one "sliding" down into his little "magic" universe of lies and
fantasies.
Pee Wee Herman again. That means I'm 'taking a bite out of slime'
again!
> > > > Lie, no one believes you. You have been labelled a liar and
> fraud for many years. How did this happen? You just gave a good
> > > demonstration.
> > >
> > > Which irks you and delights me. I enjoy watching you jealous
folk come on and try to discredit me while failing miserably on a
very consistent basis.
> >
> > More babbling ... I guess Robbie is stuck, yet again.
>
> Stuck in what appears to be an unpenetrable cloak of the truth.
Just thank your lucky stars you're being dealt this valuable lesson
> right from the master.GRANDIOSE SELF-WORTH -- a grossly inflated view of one's abilities
and self-worth, self-assured, opinionated, cocky, a braggart.
Psychopaths are arrogant people who believe they are superior human
beings.
> > > They all said I'd be gone years ago, only you're
> > > upset you weren't in on the call. You're friend who took a
shot here must also be agonizing over it...did I mention to my
delight? Well, guess who's STILL here and more popular than ever,
little dicky!! HAHAHAHA! Yup. Must be that 'demonstration'!
> >
> > GRANDIOSE SELF-WORTH -- a grossly inflated view of one's
abilities
> > and self-worth, self-assured, opinionated, cocky, a braggart.
> > Psychopaths are arrogant people who believe they are superior
human
> > beings.
>
> Enough to force you to ramble on with already-posted stuff!I guess little Robbie is having a problem having to read the TRUTH
over and over. Get used to it.
You mean all the compliments?
> > > Hmmmm....What the fact here--that you asked me a question?
Again,
> > too
> > > funny. You continue to step in your own mess.
> >
> > I already knew the answer. You stated investors
were "different" because they had economics degrees.
>
> Different from gambling addicts. You made up it's because of some
> degree. Now don't wag that tail too much as it gets stuck between
> your legs.....Scrambling does become you.
> >I refuted that with the fact that Bob has a economics degree.
>
> This is great--you didn't even KNOW what he had! That's why you
asked the master!!Now, why would I ask if I didn't already know? It's called a
rhetorical question. Think about that one, psycho-boy.
You and your 'questions' seem to confuse you too easily. The reason?
Just as with the loopholes and escape routes you put in place in case
a bet with me appears to come together as reality instead of theory,
you contaminate all you other nonsense with flip-flops and suspect
content 'just in case'. Goofy, but fun to slap you around with
afterwards.
Many small investors lose money. Know why?
> > > > > > > Who cares?
> > > > > > Once again I've exposed Robs' lies. Clearly he doesn't
want to compare these two occupations. Why?
> > > > > Because every time you get cornered you start wiggling
your
> way out with "something similar" or "let's play make-a-
comparison"
> just to get away from the original line of punishment you're
> absorbing for as long as possible. But unfortunately for you, my
> specialty is grinding away at you until you nearly lose it all!
> > > >
> > > > A longer than usual BABBLE. Robbie is getting frustrated.
> > >
> > > Whenever I can bring up how I punish you, it's worth the
effort.
> >
> > LACK OF REMORSE OR GUILT -- a lack of feelings or concern for
the
> > losses, pain, and suffering of victims; a tendency to be
> unconcerned,
> > dispassionate, coldhearted, and unempathic. This item is
usually
> > demonstrated by a disdain for one's victims.
>
> You got THAT one right! You make your bed of addiction along with
all the fantasy it creates, you sleep in it!PATHOLOGICAL LYING -- can be moderate or high; in moderate form,
they
will be shrewd, crafty, cunning, sly, and clever; in extreme form,
they will be deceptive, deceitful, underhanded, unscrupulous,
manipulative, and dishonest.
> > > > You see, Rob doesn't want anyone to see how stupid his
method appears when you put it in this light. It is a fantasy to
believe a progression could help.
> > > Theory is hardly important--except for wannabees and nerds of
> > course. It's a great feeling knowing that a progression WORKS!
> >
> > PATHOLOGICAL LYING -- can be moderate or high; in moderate
form,
> they
> > will be shrewd, crafty, cunning, sly, and clever; in extreme
form,
> > they will be deceptive, deceitful, underhanded, unscrupulous,
> > manipulative, and dishonest.
>
> You've got to be scrambling thru the cut-and-paste procedures----
I'm absolutely THRILLED to see you waste your time!But it's so easy. Bring up two browsers, cut from one, paste into
the
other. Now, that I've educated you again, made you look impotent
again, exposed your psycho tendencies again ... tell us how it
feels.
> But truthfully,
ROTFLMAO.
> i
> understand why you post these things. You're lost and looking for
> help. It just so happens you pulled on up this time that you wish
> applied to you even more so than the others! Being clever is
> definitely not one of your selling points.More psycho-babble. It won't stop me from posting the truth.
Keep posting! Every time I read one of them I see how far advanced I
am compared to you.
> > > > > > > Show me supporting evidence that only a nerd could
show!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've shown it to you many times including the latest
> > reference to
> > > > > my simulation work. Facts. What has been your response?
More
> > lies.
> > > > >
> > > > > REALITY CHECK PLEASE!! Theories aren't fact. REALITY
CHECK
> > > PLEASE!!
> > > >
> > > > No theory involved. Simple computer simulations based on a
RNG,
> > you
> > > > know those little things that are also in every VP machine.
> With
> > it
> > > I can simulate any method of VP play. That is a "REALITY
CHECK".
> > >
> > > HELLO McFLY!!! Anyone home in there??
> >
> > POOR BEHAVIORAL CONTROLS -- expressions of irritability,
annoyance,
> > impatience, threats, aggression, and verbal abuse; inadequate
> control
> > of anger and temper; acting hastily.
> >
> > I wonder if Rob even realizes that the words he uses from Back
to
> the Future are from a psychopathic bully?
>
> HAHAHA!! Now your relegated to comparing me with Hollywood actors
> again!No, not actors ... they are characters from a FICTIONAL story.
Don't you even know the difference?
How do you know it's 'fictional'? You got any proof? Biff is an
American icon to those of us you spank geeks.
> Let's get "Back To The Issue" REALITY CHECK!! HELLO
> McFLY...ANYONE HOME IN THERE!?!
> > > Simulations are theory and nothing else.
> >
> > Is that why they build those expensive flight simulators?
>
> Obviously. That's where they check out and/or confirm the
engineering models' representations. It doesn't transform any of it
into reality until everything checks out 100% -- unlike your stupid
simulation of video poker, and totally like my strategy development
and subsequent confirmation in the casinos.
All of the simulators I mentioned are significantly more complex
than the VP play simulator I wrote.
Now there's a breakthrough!
This demonstrates what a simple game VP is. You play a hand, get one
of 10-15 possible results based on an RNG and repeat.
It's almost as if you even make believe you know something about
everything at times. This stuff you're writing now has nothing to do
with your nonsensical portrayal of flight simulators being involved
in some kind of purported theory! Please stay on the same page if you
ever want to learn anything.
That's why it is so easy to PROVE that your strategy is a con.
Adding in the progression and your ridiculous subgoals took about 50
lines of code, that's it. I spent more time building the various
game probability tables and formating the output.
All to your complete satisfaction too, that is, after you ignored the
more complex portions of my strategy as well as the fact that the
machines are programmed to run in hot and cold cycles. It's all been
said before--you'll peel down the onion until you talk yourself into
what you intended to in the first place, just to feel good. Even my
win resilts have been marginalized into some anamoly of 1% or
something. I'm still betting you are playing a variation of my
strategy every time you hit the addict machines. THAT was your real
purpose for the dumb work!
>
> Is that why
> > most economic forecasters use models (often simulators)?
>
> Apples & oranges, and a misleading assumption.You stated "Simulations are theory and nothing else", I used clear
and reasonable examples to PROVE they are much more than "theory".
Where was THAT?? You've got your simulations mixed up with your
simulators. Why am I not surprised.....
> Is that why
> > engineering advances are often made using simulations of new
> > technology? Theory? ... LMAO.
>
> You're getting ahead of yourself and are looking doubly stupid.You stated "Simulations are theory and nothing else", I used clear
and reasonable examples to PROVE they are much more than "theory".
Only a liar would claim otherwise.
So confused....Good thing you're old and not able to enter the
workforce any more!
> > > Only a geek could be interested in or make believe sims
> > > would occur in the real world! Congratulations - You've now
> > > solidified your address smack dab in the middle of
Fantasyland.
> >
> > LMAO even harder. Now that Robbie has firmly inserted his foot
in his mouth, AGAIN, I can feel I've likely saved another victim from
> his con.
>
> It's interesting to see the ramble emitting from one who resides
in fantasyland.
Just the facts, as usual.
And straight from fantasyland. As usual.
···
--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@...> wrote: