vpFREE2 Forums

Anything goes on FREEvpFREE - Almost

#41

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

Let's see....1-3+6. That looks like 3 separate events to me. Once

the

operations have been completed? That sounds like you're saying a

person

who went to his job 2300 times over 10 years only really did it

ONCE!

Nope. He really did go to work 2300 times. And, in all ways other
than financailly had other impacts. However, let's get back to
finances. The net worth of the individual from working all those
years is one single number and what that person does with that net
worth today is INDEPENDENT of whether he earned it in 2300 events or
one event.

You see, it's quite difficult to argue against simple addition.

Here's another reason why your desparation reach doesn't work: The
worker only cares about what he's accomplished at the end of each

week

by how it affects his pay.

I doubt that true for most workers. There's something called job
satisfaction, interactions with co-workers, etc. that most normal
people care about. However, from this reply alone it's not too
difficult to see how you approach life.

That's what you call a SESSION. There's no
guarantees of what will happen tomorrow, or even if there will BE a
tomorrow.

Call it whatever you like. It doesn't change the math.

He needs to attain success TODAY, and he'll do whatever it
takes to make that happen. So all this metamorphosis stuff might

look

good in a test tube from the other side of the river, but up close

in

the school of common sense it's got less staying power than John

Kerry

in a bar in Southie.

The addition has 100% staying power and that's all anyone needs to be
concerned with to demonstrate that many VP hands can be treated as a
single event.

To take it one step further, many folks work for and hourly wage.
You'd have us all believe that each hours' pay is somehow different
than the sum of the pay for all the hours you worked.

Once again, please should how this is the sane approach?

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> > So now, when flabergasted with the truth, you make up a theory

that

> > says a session which includes hundreds or thousands of hands is

the

···

> > equivalent to just one. Are you nuts or what.......

> I guess I must be. I think 1-3+6 = 4. I also believe that talking
>about 4 works just as well as discussing 1-3+5 once the operations
have been completed. Since you obviously equate sanity with the
opposite view, please explain why this does not work.

#42

Nope. He really did go to work 2300 times. And, in all ways other
than financailly had other impacts. However, let's get back to
finances. The net worth of the individual from working all those
years is one single number and what that person does with that net
worth today is INDEPENDENT of whether he earned it in 2300 events
or one event.

You're all over the map again. The only issue here IS the financial
issue. No gambler has a 'net worth' from playing video poker. That's
ludicrous. Even with all I've made, it's fun money and no more. To
make believe a gambler only cares about the game's value as he steps
into his grave while dissing each session's outcome's value to
quality of life TODAY is a wonder beyond wonders.

I doubt that true for most workers. There's something called job
satisfaction, interactions with co-workers, etc. that most normal
people care about. However, from this reply alone it's not too
difficult to see how you approach life.

You're really from the 'old school' mentality. Job satisfaction?
Interaction with co-workers?? HA! Where've you been? Just as you
insist on incorrectly & misleadingly applying long-term rules to
short-term play, so too do you apply last generation's values to
today's realities. You're out of touch, and that's a direct result
from video poker being the driving force in your life. Anyone who
sends their wife to SEVERAL Dancer classes has distanced themselves
from what a normal life really is comprised of. If you don't wake up
soon, your declining years won't be as enjoyable as that retirement
booklet you've read.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#43

<<No gambler has a 'net worth' from playing video poker.>>

That's one of your more idiotic statements.

<<To make believe a gambler only cares about the game's value as he steps
into his grave while dissing each session's outcome's value to quality of
life TODAY is a wonder beyond wonders.>>

And yet after 20 of your snake-oil system sessions, the gambler using
optimal strategy is much more likely to be ahead than one using your magic
spell. Was that when you snapped, butthead? When your only hope for
salvation crashed and burned? Or have you been a liar, fraud, and welsher
your entire life?

Where's the million dollars you owe me?

Cogno

#44

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Cogno Scienti" <cognoscienti@g...>
wrote:

Where's the million dollars you owe me?

Show where your original post CLEARLY said 'he' AND did not say 'she'
and I'll give you $2million. Now you've got something to chase.
Otherwise, you may meet me at Wynn next week and I'll accept your
$1million in cash. But I won't cry if you don't bring it. 'Eppert' vp
players usually only have money the day they get paid or when their
welfare checks arrive.

#45

<<Show where your original post CLEARLY said 'he' AND did not say 'she'
and I'll give you $2million. Now you've got something to chase.
Otherwise, you may meet me at Wynn next week and I'll accept your $1million
in cash. But I won't cry if you don't bring it. 'Eppert' vp players usually
only have money the day they get paid or when their welfare checks arrive.>>

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FREEvpFREE/message/2165

What time at Wynn?

God are you stupid.

Cogno

#46

2168 Re: Anything goes on FREEvpFREE

Go back to this message. Guess all that scientific intellect isn't
doing a whole lot for your confidence now, is it?

I wouldn't expect someone like you would ever go inside a place like
Wynn. all that class and luxury doesn't seem to fit those dives you
make believe you're winning in. Just have someone shove the check under
my door.

#47

You are even stupider than I gave you credit for.

2168 is not "my original message." It is the one you replied to and
introduced the typo. You now owe me $2 million. Pay up.

<<I wouldn't expect someone like you would ever go inside a place like Wynn.
all that class and luxury doesn't seem to fit those dives you make believe
you're winning in. Just have someone shove the check under my door.>>

And you would be extremely consistent in being 100% wrong about everything.

Cogno

#48

I really do believe you are operating under the sicko influence of
Scientologi, Cognifico. And you are supposed to be at the right hand of
Dick for intelligence??

I don't read posts until I set them up for a REPLY, so 2168 is the
first time I originally saw your nonsense. Hello, McFly?? Anybody home
in there?? Hello genius?? I still expect to be paid.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Cogno Scienti" <cognoscienti@g...>
wrote:

···

You are even stupider than I gave you credit for.

2168 is not "my original message." It is the one you replied to and
introduced the typo. You now owe me $2 million. Pay up.

#49

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rsing1111" <rsinger1111@c...>
wrote:

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...>

wrote:

> Nope. He really did go to work 2300 times. And, in all ways other
> than financailly had other impacts. However, let's get back to
> finances. The net worth of the individual from working all those
> years is one single number and what that person does with that

net

> worth today is INDEPENDENT of whether he earned it in 2300 events
>or one event.

You're all over the map again. The only issue here IS the financial
issue. No gambler has a 'net worth' from playing video poker.

Trying to mince words won't buy you a thing. You only look like more
of a fool to everyone.

That's
ludicrous. Even with all I've made, it's fun money and no more. To
make believe a gambler only cares about the game's value as he

steps

into his grave while dissing each session's outcome's value to
quality of life TODAY is a wonder beyond wonders.

Oh, I see. Your trying to deflect the subject again since you have
ABSOLUTELY NO counter argument. The point is still the same, moron,
it doesn't matter how many hands you've played in the past. It all
adds up to one number, like it or not.

That's what really nice about addition, it all comes out so nicely.
The order doesn't matter and you can take an already computed result
and add more to it. It's so easy for the rest of us, if you had only
completed the 3rd grade you'd understand this simple fact.

> I doubt that true for most workers. There's something called job
> satisfaction, interactions with co-workers, etc. that most normal
> people care about. However, from this reply alone it's not too
> difficult to see how you approach life.

You're really from the 'old school' mentality. Job satisfaction?
Interaction with co-workers?? HA! Where've you been?

For most of my like ... working with good, moral, down to earth
people. Not sociopaths like yourself who could never hold down a real
job.

Just as you
insist on incorrectly & misleadingly applying long-term rules to
short-term play,

Nope. Never once. That's your game.

so too do you apply last generation's values to
today's realities. You're out of touch,

You wouldn't know reality if you tripped over it while cooking dinner
for your wife. Talk about out-of-touch. You are the poster boy.
However, this blatant and obvious attempt to continue deflecting the
debate away from your ludicrous position that 1-3+6 is not equal to 4
won't work.

and that's a direct result
from video poker being the driving force in your life. Anyone who
sends their wife to SEVERAL Dancer classes has distanced themselves
from what a normal life really is comprised of.

Now you're back lying again. I NEVER sent my wife to any of Dancers'
classes. In fact, I told her there was nothing there for her to learn
that I hadn't already explained to her. She went anyway as wives are
prone to do.

If you don't wake up
soon, your declining years won't be as enjoyable as that retirement
booklet you've read.

What booklet would that be? I been comfortably retired for 7 years
now. I have homes to two states that are completely paid for and
spend my spare time doing exactly what I want to do. Of course, a
small part of that is making you look like a complete fool.

Now, back to the topic at hand. Please explain why 1-3+6 is not equal
to 4?

Dick

#50

<<I don't read posts until I set them up for a REPLY, so 2168 is the first
time I originally saw your nonsense. Hello, McFly?? Anybody home in there??
Hello genius?? I still expect to be paid.>>

I would expect you to blame others for your mistakes.

Here's your offer:

<<Show where your original post CLEARLY said 'he' AND did not say 'she'
and I'll give you $2million. Now you've got something to chase.
Otherwise, you may meet me at Wynn next week and I'll accept your $1million
in cash. But I won't cry if you don't bring it. 'Eppert' vp players usually
only have money the day they get paid or when their welfare checks arrive.>>

Where's my two million?

Cogno

#51

> You're all over the map again. The only issue here IS the
financial issue. No gambler has a 'net worth' from playing video

poker.

Trying to mince words won't buy you a thing. You only look like

more of a fool to everyone.

....And that has WHAT to do with my point?

Oh, I see. Your trying to deflect the subject again since you have
ABSOLUTELY NO counter argument. The point is still the same, moron,
it doesn't matter how many hands you've played in the past. It all
adds up to one number, like it or not.

I can see you're getting frustrated. Your continuous name-calling
only exacerbates your blood pressure problems. What kind of a self-
proclaimed 'man of science' would offer "it all adds up to one
number" without clarity? Everything "adds up" Einstein. You can add
up how many gallons of gasoline you buy thru your entire life, yet
the only important part of that is in how much was bought TODAY and
how it affects TODAY's budget. Your "it all adds up" has no real
meaning other than to statistics freaks.

For most of my like ... working with good, moral, down to earth
people. Not sociopaths like yourself who could never hold down a
real job.

Yup. Yup. There's that theoretical life of yours again. And mine. You
can tell you have little experience in the world and have been locked
up in some sort of geek-room during your working career. You'd be
dangerous in today's climate.

Now you're back lying again. I NEVER sent my wife to any of
Dancers' classes. In fact, I told her there was nothing there for
her to learn that I hadn't already explained to her. She went anyway
as wives are prone to do.

I guess I hit that nerve again that triggers denial. I like how you
try to say how you know as much as or more than Dancer about vp (you
both deserve each other regardless), but the undeniable fact remains
that if you didn't turn your poor wife into the same type of gambling
addict you are, she wouldn't care one hoot about going to one of
those useless classes--let alone two. Now she's probably been
poisoned just like you are, with baloney about how if she plays
flawless video poker for long hours often and for as much of her
remaining days as she can, she'll be in line for a teeny-weeny
percentage win. That is pathetic, undeniably misleading, and a cruel
way to treat someone you're supposed to love. Shame on you. Why don't
you just drop the gambling and live out your days as respectable
retirees, with friends, enjoying relatives, and being able to take a
vacation having NOTHING to do with video poker. Wouldn't that be
refreshing....to be able to do what all those others do?

What booklet would that be? I been comfortably retired for 7 years
now. I have homes to two states that are completely paid for and
spend my spare time doing exactly what I want to do. Of course, a
small part of that is making you look like a complete fool.

Hey, I have homes in two states also--only one of them's not Nevada.
I'm not stupid. Video poker and gambling in general has a
stranglehold on your life. But that's what you 'want' to do.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "rgmustain" <rgmustain@a...> wrote:

#52

Who blamed 'others'? It's the way yahoo formulates words and spaces.
The fact is I'm right and you don't want to part with that theoretical
$1million that you lost here. Big surprise.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Cogno Scienti" <cognoscienti@g...>
wrote:

···

I would expect you to blame others for your mistakes.

#53

<<ho blamed 'others'? It's the way yahoo formulates words and spaces.
The fact is I'm right and you don't want to part with that theoretical
$1million that you lost here. Big surprise.>>

Wow, you're really scraping the bottom. Now you're claiming Yahoo is an
email client? What an idiot.

Where's the $2 million you owe me, welsher?

Cogno

#54

You don't determine how words will print out and I don't determine it.
The fact that you're such a poor loser doesn't detract from the fact
that you lost and have had enough losing at video poker, so you're
trying to weasle out of this loss. Pay up.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "Cogno Scienti" <cognoscienti@g...>
wrote:

<<ho blamed 'others'? It's the way yahoo formulates words and spaces.
The fact is I'm right and you don't want to part with that theoretical
$1million that you lost here. Big surprise.>>

Wow, you're really scraping the bottom. Now you're claiming Yahoo is

an

···

email client? What an idiot.

Where's the $2 million you owe me, welsher?

Cogno