Denny,
Congratulations. That is great news.
I read your message and I said to myself, "This is like hitting a RF against something we despise more than the casinos!"
Guru
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is." - Yogi Berra
···
________________________________
From: denflo60 <dennis.florence@worldnet.att.net>
To: vpFREE@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, March 15, 2010 5:37:44 PM
Subject: [vpFREE] Re: 1099's
Hi: For those of you who followed this item, I previously mentioned that I would give an update of the ongoing process when I had something to report. You may recall that I received a notice from the IRS saying that they turned down my intial appeal ( I used Schedule C and they said I was not a business) and I had 90 days to either pay them or inform them that I wanted to go to tax court. In the interim my CPA and a lawyer I had used to establish my Corporation have been preparing a response which we planned to submit about the 26th of the month. No interim information has been provided for nor requested by/to the IRS after February 1st.
I received a call from my accountant today saying he received a new letter from the IRS saying . "We are pleased to tell you that with your help we were able to clear up the differences between your records and your payer's record...... ..If you have already received a notice of deficiency (I had), you may disregard it. You won't need to file a petition with the United States Tax Court I was planning to)."
While I am not sure what happened in the interim. I can only assume that the numerous attachments originally submitted or the subsequent appeal letters from my accountant were finally read by a knowledgable IRS person other than just a computer or clerk.
I thank the IRS and especially my accountant Mike McLennan of Detroit for bringing this to a resolution before the lawyer fees got out of hand. As I have said in the past I have read every book and tax case on this subject I could get my hands on and I believe I have ethically filed, have addressed every issue on this subject required by the tax code. I commend the work by Jean Scott and Marissa Chien which was my main book reference. Given the results of my case, I believe if you honestly follow this book and the related tax court cases and respond positively to the issues therein, Schedule C likely will be eventually approved by the IRS.
Sometime right tops might.
If someone would like any "off the record" advice on the topic, drop me a private note. Denny
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups. com, "denflo60" <dennis.florence@ ...> wrote:
Jan: Since I started filing as a recreational gambler some years ago I used the session method and was never audited. I reported based on the session length of a day because of the "churn" of the machines. To me the bigger question is the precise definition of a session.
When I started betting significant money and filed as a professional with schedule C, I continued using the session method. Given that the Casino supplies the total of my accrued W2G's, I have used the daily session method because it agrees with the W2G submission. I do have complete contemporary records of all $1200.+ wins from the attachments of the Casino W2's which can be tied back through time of day of the "hit" to my records. I survived the 2006 audit about using Scedule C but what never directly asked about session method or length. As I have reported here and you responded I have faced the same issues for the 2007 year and I, my accountant and my lawyer will fill out paper work to to request the matter be taken to tax court. Whether the session method or session length comes up at that time I do not know, we are prepared to defend it and its length. Of course whether I win or lose will be not known for some lengthy period.
Denny
--- In vpFREE@yahoogroups. com, "Jan Spornhauer" <janspornhauer@ > wrote:
>
> I would like to know of anyone has tried to use daily session win VS using
> the W2G as income. It seems to me this is a more fair way to report gambling
> income but maybe the IRS doesn't look at it that way. Unfortunately, a
> taxpayer who has any substantial W2G receipts and has equal losses is in the
> end paying more income tax.
>
>
>
> The Gambler
>
> _____
>
> From: vpFREE@yahoogroups. com [mailto:vpFREE@yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of
> tsaimitch
> Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 1:51 PM
> To: vpFREE@yahoogroups. com
> Subject: [vpFREE] Re: 1099's
>
>
>
>
>
> You can deduct losses on Schedule A, or file as a professional gambler with
> Schedule C.
> Might be able to use "Session wins" rather than 1099s as you wins, but I
> hear conflicting info on this board.
>
> See http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/vpFREE/ message/104962>
> yahoo.com/group/ vpFREE/message/ 104962 for some problems with Schedule C.
>
> http://www.readybet go.com/book- reviews/review- 606.html>
> go.com/book- reviews/review- 606.html
>
> How To Turn Poker Playing Into a Business (Knowing What to Deduct to Improve
> Your Odds With the IRS) by Ann-Margaret Johnston (122 pages, paperbound,
> $19.95) and The Tax Guide for Gamblers by Roger and Yolanda Roche -- Sixth
> Edition (64 pages, paperbound, $29.95). Both are excellent references and
> both are available at Gambler's Book Shop in Las Vegas.
>
> http://www.casinoga ming.com/ features/ taxlaws.html>
> ming.com/features/ taxlaws.html
>
> All winnings from all forms of gambling are taxable and must be declared as
> income on your tax return.
>
> All losses from all forms of gambling are deductible as an itemized
> deduction for recreational players, limited to the amount of winnings
> declared.
>
> Professional gamblers hold file as a self-employed business using Schedule
> C.
>
> The value of "comps" received are considered to be gaming winnings and
> should be included in your total winnings. This does allow you to deduct
> gaming losses to offset the income from the "comps."
>
> Wins and losses are reported only in the year they occur. Excess losses
> cannot be carried forward or back to offset winnings in other years.
>
> Married couples filing a joint return must combine their winnings and
> combine their losses, and report only one figure for each.
>
> The IRS has issued instructions that "lumping" is unacceptable. "Lumping" is
> the practice of reporting one net win figure and no losses, or reporting
> nothing if your net from gambling is a loss. You must report the total of
> your winning sessions separately from the total of your losing sessions.
>
> The IRS requires that an accurate diary or similar record must be maintained
> for substantiating your wins and losses, and that the diary should contain
> at least the following information: (1) the date and type of your specific
> wager; (2) the name of the gaming establishment; (3) the address or location
> of the gaming establishment; (4) the names of the other person(s), if any,
> present with you; (5) the amount(s) you won or lost.
>
> The IRS also requires that in order to substantiate your diary, supplemental
> records are required, including the following (these records are not to be
> submitted with your return, but will be needed should you be audited): (1)
> W-2Gs; (2) wagering tickets or receipts; (3) canceled checks; (4) credit
> card records such as cash advances; (5) bank withdrawals; (6) any receipts
> provided by the gambling establishment.
>
> KEEP RECORDS OF YOUR GAMBLING TRANSACTIONS
>
> In February of 1998, in a case involving an unemployed gambler who failed to
> file timely returns for two years and kept no records, the Tax Court ruled
> that the gambler could not deduct unsubstantiated gambling losses. In
> addition the Tax Court upheld the IRS which had levied additional amounts
> for failure to file on time and for the accuracy-related negligence penalty.
> This increased the gambler's tax liability by 43%!
>
> In other words, they threw the book at this gambler, who actually told the
> court that although he maintained a gambling log for one of the years in
> question, it was not accurate because it was too time-consuming to make it
> precise.
>
> If you are collecting W2-Gs and not keeping accurate records, this very well
> could be in your future.
>
> <many more details on the webpage>
>
> http://www.irs. gov/taxtopics/ tc419.html>
> gov/taxtopics/ tc419.html
>
> You may deduct gambling losses only if you itemize deductions. Claim your
> gambling losses as a miscellaneous deduction that is not subject to the 2%
> limit on Form 1040, Schedule A (PDF). However, the amount of losses you
> deduct may not be more than the amount of gambling income reported on your
> return. It is important to keep an accurate diary or similar record of your
> gambling winnings and losses. To deduct your losses, you must be able to
> provide receipts, tickets, statements or other records that show the amount
> of both your winnings and losses. Refer to Publication 529, Miscellaneous
> Deductions, for more information.
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]