vpFREE2 Forums

100 Facts and 1 Opinion

#61

> The next thing you're about to say is that Teddy Kennedy was a
> Republican just on the night he killed Mary Jo Kopeckne.

South Vietnam Under Ngo Dinh Diem
Using SEATO for political cover, the Eisenhower administration
helped create a new nation from dust in southern Vietnam. In 1955,
with the help of massive amounts of American military, political,
and economic aid, the Government of the Republic of Vietnam (GVN or
South Vietnam) was born.

??? Might as well pull out quotes from Indonesia's inception,
because that has about as much to do with the Vietnam War as this.

> Have you ever heard of politics? Wake up and get out of the
clouds.
> Saudi is the last place we'd attack because of political ties,
> favors, and yes, because of it's having the world's largest oil
> reserves. I myself am in favor of eliminating that country from
the face of the earth for their internal support of terrorism, but

it can't be done in a flash. It is a real puzzle.

They are terrorists but we can't kill them because they are our
friends? Such bullcrap. So we invade Iraq cause we don't like them
much??

We attacked Iraq because of reasons you can't come to grips with and
never will because of your sour grapes over the election.

> > > Man, now maybe you once again see why Kerry the
> > > fairy got 86'd.
> >
> > I would think that a male cheerleader was more of a fairy than

a decorated war hero. But, once again, the election is over and

this is about the war.

He's as much a REAL hero as my dog. You only read what you want to
believe. Typical democrat.

>
Again, you totally avoid the point. I will say again: I would think
that a male cheerleader was more of a fairy than a decorated war
hero.

And again, my dog has done more heroic things than Kerry the traitor.

> >
If the Iraq situation was the only factor to
> consider last month, there would have been a different outcome.
>
> That a democratic dream, and a feel-good position for those who
just can't get over the results

December 1, 2004--Three weeks following the battle for Fallujah,

44% voters rate President Bush's handling of the situation in Iraq
good or excellent while 55% say he is doing a fair or poor job in
this area. (Rasmussen Reports)

So even while scraping the bottom for anti-bush info, all you could
come up with is positive results from a meaningless report. But I'm
sure you've rearranged it around in your head to be a knock on bush,
so all is OK within the twisted mind of 'John'.

> > Saddam was killing his own people while we were financing his
war with Iran.
>
> That's what you are supposed to have been thinking without

knowing what really was going on.

In other words, you don't know how it happened but you are
pretending to be privy to other information. Next you will say that
the GI Joe action figure was based on you. Clueless.

There is no pretending. Your pal Dicky has the patent on that one--
one of "SEVERAL" patents he's responsible for.

> It was a lot more complicated than that.
> The general public isn't always going to be privy to the facts on
why and how. My belief is that we should have exterminated both
country's leaderships and there would be far less trouble now.
> >
> > > > Again, every reason that was used to go to war with Iraq

was false.

Are you sure the napalm fumes didn't get too inside your head? Or
maybe it was agent orange.....

>
> The same old song and dance again that Kerry used as he lost the
> election.

OK, Kerry again. Damn Rob you sure are a sore winner. This is about
the war, not the election. Concentrate.

To the complete contrary, I'm a CONSTANTLY JUBILANT WINNER.

A suicide bomber is just a person without a jet fighter at his
disposal to deliver explosives.

You're not even corny here. You mean to say "Kamakazi Pilot". I don't
think there's any in the USAF, last I read.

OK, let me see..... Scott Peterson divided by OJ Simpson...carry

the two....equal Michael Jackson. I still don't understand your point.

Peterson thought he was smart enough never to get caught....that it
would all just eventually blow over. Sadam had the same attitude. Why
do you think he toyed with the inspectors so often and for so long?
why do you think he challenged the USAF now and then? Why do you
think he supported terrorism??

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

#62

> What's a 'beatnik'?? A peacenik is someone like you, who would
rather run than fight. Someone who'd rather take a chance at other

people dying so that you would have a better chance at survival.

I can prove my service record which is more than you or w can do.

If

you would take the time to actually read some of these replies you
would know that my position on war is as a last resort. Don't even
attempt to put words into my mouth you chickenhawk.

You can prove your service, RIGHT. Just like your friend Dicky can
PROVE he has $700k to show me, or that he can "PROVE" there are
hundreds of 'winning advantage players' out there right alongside his
wet dreams.

> You'd likely do something stupid like that because you radiate
> stupidity here.

Oh ass-clown, you know me so well? Again, clueless. I rely on

facts, you on your own opinion presented as fact. The difference is
obvious.

It's radiating again.....

  
> While you'd
> prefer others have veto power over what we do and how we do it,
our
> president's strength lies in the fact that he'll never allow such
> foolishness to occur.

His strength sure doesn't lie in his service record or his
accomplishments. Again Rob, some proof if it's not too much trouble.

You idiot---or maybe you just can't help it. Service proves nothing
about anyone. Oh, with one possible exception---maybe Clinton. He
just didn't get to unload in young girls' mouths enough when he was
young like soldiers do, so he tried to catch up in the Oval Office.

> The only thing that matters to me is how courageously GWB has
> attacked terrorism in Afg., Iraq, here with the Patriotic Act,

and wherever it needs to be done and whenever it needs to be done.

Pretty much the answer I expected since all he has done is get us
into an unwinnable war and give tax breaks to the wealthy.

Another reason why you're still looking at him in the most powerful
job on earth.....and why Kerry is taking tomato ketchup baths with
Michael Moore.

Right, taking care of the need of your own population is
meaningless. Improving the quality of life in Iraq is paramount. If
all that is up to me, why do I pay so many taxes?? So w can send

our youth overseas to die for a personal vendetta?

I don't know about you (but I can probably take a good guess) but my
quality of life has improved drastically over the past 4 years.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

#63

> If you really think the election is over, then you'd stop
parroting your boy-loser Kerry.

The opinions expressed are mine. All mine. I fought to be able to
express them and damn if I will let you stop me.

Obviously I cannot stop you, but they are humorous.

> Movies?? I asked if you've ever BEEN on one.

No, they didn't exist when I was on active. But I'm sure with your
security clearance level that you haven't been on one either. The
Soviets had an impressive arsenal of supersubs too. I wonder who

has them now??

I've never been in the service yet I've been on many subs of all
classes. It's too bad you didn't get to see them up close. It would
probably change your sour attitude towards the US. And ALL of the
former Soviet 'supersubs' are drydocked for good or sunk. And since
they haven't kept up with technologies in the past decade,
their 'supersubs' even if in top shape would be worthless today.

> > > Yeah it sure does. I'm the only one who matters here, and I
say you are a true and certified fool.
> >
> > Rob, Rob, a legend in your own mind.
>
> Gee, where'd you dig that one up from.
>
> You don't matter, not at all,
> > not to anyone.
>
> Just like with your liberal friend and coward Dicky

Don't even know the man, but I think I like him if he can get your
panties in a bunch.

I don't wear underwear. But I'll bet HE's had a fudgie-wudgie or two.

>
> I wonder....Did you get a lot of laughs over bringing up the loss
of your brother in Vietnam. I did.

How cowardly you are. You are truely a "compassionate" conservative.

You're a funny storyteller. Think about it.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

#64

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

> > Then learn how to get over it and move on. Instead of

dishonoring

> his memory with cowardice statements,
>
> You are the stupidist man I have ever met.

I don't believe you have had the privilege of meeting me as yet.

If I am lucky, I will never face-to-face with you.

Dishonoring his memory,

> fuck you, I love my brother and don't see how his death
accomplished anything considering how Nixon cut and ran. Typical
republicant. If it effects the approval rating, get out. Dying in

a

senseless war is senseless. Does your son know that you are ready

for

him to die??

My son and I have talked and he understands. His wife does not
however, but she's supportive, approving, and will listen to every
word I say knowing it is more educational than liberal-bashing

(which

is fun). You totally have dishonored your brother's memory and
contribution to this country by taking the anti-war positions --

esp.

in the Vietnam War

If you are going to tell me now that Vietnam was a good and just
war, then you have definately taken leave of your senses.

-- and the anti-USA blabber that you do

Not anti-USA. I love America I have served my country and would
again if the cause was just.

. You
should be ashamed and mortified. If you aren't able to condescend,
then I will be ashamed for you.
>
> > respect him like a man. Should my
> > son be killed, I am prepared for the loss, because I will

always

> have pride in that he knew he was doing the just and right thing.
>
> So, he's a sheep too?

It's called a word that did not escape your brother but has

escaped

you: Bravery.

In this conflict it is called stupidity.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

#65

> > You are the stupidist man I have ever met.
>
> I don't believe you have had the privilege of meeting me as yet.

If I am lucky, I will never face-to-face with you.

Maybe you should try to be 'skillful' like The Dicker makes believe
he is.

If you are going to tell me now that Vietnam was a good and just
war, then you have definately taken leave of your senses.

Not my problem, and I don't waste time when it has no effect either
way on me now.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

#66

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

>
> > The next thing you're about to say is that Teddy Kennedy was a
> > Republican just on the night he killed Mary Jo Kopeckne.
>
> South Vietnam Under Ngo Dinh Diem
> Using SEATO for political cover, the Eisenhower administration
> helped create a new nation from dust in southern Vietnam. In

1955,

> with the help of massive amounts of American military,

political,

> and economic aid, the Government of the Republic of Vietnam (GVN

or

> South Vietnam) was born.

??? Might as well pull out quotes from Indonesia's inception,
because that has about as much to do with the Vietnam War as this.

Rob, you dunce, I am presenting facts, not twisted opinion. Don't
insult me with idle blabberings

>
> > Have you ever heard of politics? Wake up and get out of the
> clouds.
> > Saudi is the last place we'd attack because of political ties,
> > favors, and yes, because of it's having the world's largest

oil

> > reserves. I myself am in favor of eliminating that country

from

> the face of the earth for their internal support of terrorism,

but

it can't be done in a flash. It is a real puzzle.
>
> They are terrorists but we can't kill them because they are our
> friends? Such bullcrap. So we invade Iraq cause we don't like

them

> much??

We attacked Iraq because of reasons you can't come to grips with

and

never will because of your sour grapes over the election.

Every reason that was given for the war with Iraq has been
subsequently found to be false. It's called truth, deal with it.

>
> > > > Man, now maybe you once again see why Kerry the
> > > > fairy got 86'd.
> > >
> > > I would think that a male cheerleader was more of a fairy

than

a decorated war hero. But, once again, the election is over and
> this is about the war.

He's as much a REAL hero as my dog. You only read what you want to
believe. Typical democrat.

OK, what would you like me to believe about w and this war?? Try to
be factual as I have been.

> >
> Again, you totally avoid the point. I will say again: I would

think

> that a male cheerleader was more of a fairy than a decorated war
> hero.

And again, my dog has done more heroic things than Kerry the

traitor.

And yet again, you totally avoid the point. I will say again: I
would think that a male cheerleader was more of a fairy than a
decorated war hero. Facts Rob, facts. If you have none, just admit
it. Coward.

> > >
> If the Iraq situation was the only factor to
> > consider last month, there would have been a different outcome.
> >
> > That a democratic dream, and a feel-good position for those

who

> just can't get over the results
>
> December 1, 2004--Three weeks following the battle for Fallujah,
44% voters rate President Bush's handling of the situation in Iraq
good or excellent while 55% say he is doing a fair or poor job in
this area. (Rasmussen Reports)

So even while scraping the bottom for anti-bush info, all you

could

come up with is positive results from a meaningless report. But

I'm

sure you've rearranged it around in your head to be a knock on

bush,

so all is OK within the twisted mind of 'John'.

They are called facts, again I have to say, facts. If you have some;
present them. Not your opinion, facts.

>
> > > Saddam was killing his own people while we were financing

his

> war with Iran.
> >
> > That's what you are supposed to have been thinking without
knowing what really was going on.
>
> In other words, you don't know how it happened but you are
> pretending to be privy to other information. Next you will say

that

> the GI Joe action figure was based on you. Clueless.

There is no pretending. Your pal Dicky has the patent on that one--
one of "SEVERAL" patents he's responsible for.

Again, don't know the man. Just stay on topic.

>
> > It was a lot more complicated than that.
> > The general public isn't always going to be privy to the facts

on

> why and how. My belief is that we should have exterminated both
> country's leaderships and there would be far less trouble now.
> > >
> > > > > Again, every reason that was used to go to war with Iraq
was false.

Are you sure the napalm fumes didn't get too inside your head? Or
maybe it was agent orange.....
> >
> > The same old song and dance again that Kerry used as he lost

the

> > election.
>
> OK, Kerry again. Damn Rob you sure are a sore winner. This is

about

> the war, not the election. Concentrate.

To the complete contrary, I'm a CONSTANTLY JUBILANT WINNER.

Then let the election rest and concentrate on the discussion at hand.

>
> A suicide bomber is just a person without a jet fighter at his
> disposal to deliver explosives.

You're not even corny here. You mean to say "Kamakazi Pilot". I

don't

think there's any in the USAF, last I read.

I didn't say kamikazi and I didn't mean kamikazi. If these people
had a way to deliver their explosives without dying, I'm pretty sure
that they would. It seems to be their only option.

>
> OK, let me see..... Scott Peterson divided by OJ Simpson...carry
the two....equal Michael Jackson. I still don't understand your

point.

Peterson thought he was smart enough never to get caught....that

it

would all just eventually blow over. Sadam had the same attitude.

Why

do you think he toyed with the inspectors so often and for so

long?

why do you think he challenged the USAF now and then? Why do you
think he supported terrorism??

I don't know. What about OJ and MJ? will they ever pay the price for
their crimes??

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

>

#67

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

>
> > What's a 'beatnik'?? A peacenik is someone like you, who would
> rather run than fight. Someone who'd rather take a chance at

other

people dying so that you would have a better chance at survival.
>
> I can prove my service record which is more than you or w can

do.

If
> you would take the time to actually read some of these replies

you

> would know that my position on war is as a last resort. Don't

even

> attempt to put words into my mouth you chickenhawk.

You can prove your service, RIGHT. Just like your friend Dicky can
PROVE he has $700k to show me, or that he can "PROVE" there are
hundreds of 'winning advantage players' out there right alongside

his

wet dreams.

Stay on topic, Robbie. I don't know this person of which you speak.
Oh yes, I can prove my service!! Can you. Your whole scenario is so
tied up in secracy and slight of mouth that I'm not even sure that
you can tell the difference between real and fantasy.

>
> > You'd likely do something stupid like that because you radiate
> > stupidity here.
>
> Oh ass-clown, you know me so well? Again, clueless. I rely on
facts, you on your own opinion presented as fact. The difference

is

obvious.

It's radiating again.....

The ignorance of your inability to back up one thing that you state
with a single fact is the only thing radiating around here.

>
> > While you'd
> > prefer others have veto power over what we do and how we do

it,

> our
> > president's strength lies in the fact that he'll never allow

such

> > foolishness to occur.
>
> His strength sure doesn't lie in his service record or his
> accomplishments. Again Rob, some proof if it's not too much

trouble.

You idiot---or maybe you just can't help it. Service proves

nothing

about anyone.

A statement made by someone that has not served. To serve their
stupid idea of a false truth. Blow it out your ass, it couldn't
smell any worse.

Oh, with one possible exception---maybe Clinton. He
just didn't get to unload in young girls' mouths enough when he

was

young like soldiers do, so he tried to catch up in the Oval Office.
>
> > The only thing that matters to me is how courageously GWB has
> > attacked terrorism in Afg., Iraq, here with the Patriotic Act,
and wherever it needs to be done and whenever it needs to be done.
>
> Pretty much the answer I expected since all he has done is get

us

> into an unwinnable war and give tax breaks to the wealthy.

Another reason why you're still looking at him in the most

powerful

job on earth.....and why Kerry is taking tomato ketchup baths with
Michael Moore.

???

>
> Right, taking care of the need of your own population is
> meaningless. Improving the quality of life in Iraq is paramount.

If

> all that is up to me, why do I pay so many taxes?? So w can send
our youth overseas to die for a personal vendetta?

I don't know about you (but I can probably take a good guess) but

my

quality of life has improved drastically over the past 4 years.

Welcome to the minority on that one.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

#68

This entire load of shit deserves no response.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

>
> > If you really think the election is over, then you'd stop
> parroting your boy-loser Kerry.
>
> The opinions expressed are mine. All mine. I fought to be able

to

> express them and damn if I will let you stop me.

Obviously I cannot stop you, but they are humorous.
>
> > Movies?? I asked if you've ever BEEN on one.
>
> No, they didn't exist when I was on active. But I'm sure with

your

> security clearance level that you haven't been on one either.

The

> Soviets had an impressive arsenal of supersubs too. I wonder who
has them now??

I've never been in the service yet I've been on many subs of all
classes. It's too bad you didn't get to see them up close. It

would

probably change your sour attitude towards the US. And ALL of the
former Soviet 'supersubs' are drydocked for good or sunk. And

since

they haven't kept up with technologies in the past decade,
their 'supersubs' even if in top shape would be worthless today.
>
> > > > Yeah it sure does. I'm the only one who matters here, and

I

> say you are a true and certified fool.
> > >
> > > Rob, Rob, a legend in your own mind.
> >
> > Gee, where'd you dig that one up from.
> >
> > You don't matter, not at all,
> > > not to anyone.
> >
> > Just like with your liberal friend and coward Dicky
>
> Don't even know the man, but I think I like him if he can get

your

> panties in a bunch.

I don't wear underwear. But I'll bet HE's had a fudgie-wudgie or

two.

> >
> > I wonder....Did you get a lot of laughs over bringing up the

loss

> of your brother in Vietnam. I did.
>
> How cowardly you are. You are truely a "compassionate"

conservative.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

You're a funny storyteller. Think about it.

#69

> ??? Might as well pull out quotes from Indonesia's inception,
> because that has about as much to do with the Vietnam War as this.

Rob, you dunce, I am presenting facts, not twisted opinion. Don't
insult me with idle blabberings.

Duh! And those facts are supposed to have WHAT to do with anything
here? Clear the napalm fumes out and try again.

> > They are terrorists but we can't kill them because they are our
> > friends? Such bullcrap. So we invade Iraq cause we don't like
them much??
>
> We attacked Iraq because of reasons you can't come to grips with
and never will because of your sour grapes over the election.

Every reason that was given for the war with Iraq has been
subsequently found to be false. It's called truth, deal with it.

So say the democrats led by traiterous T. Kennedy. (Daschel got what
was coming), and Reid's no leader. So now tell me why they lost so
much in the election?? Could it possibly be because THEY were the
ones not being truthful? Maybe just a teensy weensy bit???

> He's as much a REAL hero as my dog. You only read what you want

to believe. Typical democrat.

OK, what would you like me to believe about w and this war?? Try to
be factual as I have been.

Iraq equates to terrorism support which equates to 9-11 which equates
to Muslim scum of the earth. GWB's dealing with it. Now all we need
to do is clamp down on thoise terrorists hiding over here. That's why
the Patriot Act needs a little beefing up, and anyone who has
something to hide in this country will be scanned over like a fly on
shit.

> And again, my dog has done more heroic things than Kerry the
traitor.

And yet again, you totally avoid the point. I will say again: I
would think that a male cheerleader was more of a fairy than a
decorated war hero. Facts Rob, facts. If you have none, just admit
it. Coward.

A fact doesn't mean conjecture and what you think. You've already
proven something here--that your mind doesn't work well....and maybe
never has.

> So even while scraping the bottom for anti-bush info, all you
could come up with is positive results from a meaningless report.

But I'm sure you've rearranged it around in your head to be a knock
on bush, so all is OK within the twisted mind of 'John'.

They are called facts, again I have to say, facts. If you have

some; present them. Not your opinion, facts.

I'm too busy right now making you look like a Dick-like fool for your
inability to understand what a 'fact' really is.

  
> > > The same old song and dance again that Kerry used as he lost
the election.
> >
> > OK, Kerry again. Damn Rob you sure are a sore winner. > > To

the complete contrary, I'm a CONSTANTLY JUBILANT WINNER.

Then let the election rest and concentrate on the discussion at

hand.

   

Tell that to yourself first.

> > A suicide bomber is just a person without a jet fighter at his
> > disposal to deliver explosives.
>
> You're not even corny here. You mean to say "Kamakazi Pilot". I
don't think there's any in the USAF, last I read.

I didn't say kamikazi and I didn't mean kamikazi. If these people
had a way to deliver their explosives without dying, I'm pretty

sure that they would. It seems to be their only option.

Ha! And now you show how little you know ablout these muslim animals.
They WANT to die for their sickly cause because they believe that's
what allah wants them to do so they can go to some mutant heaven and
get laid by a bunch of greasy-legged virgins. (The grease is
purported to be there in order that hundreds of these degenerates can
slip in and out as quickly as possible).

> Peterson thought he was smart enough never to get caught....that
it would all just eventually blow over. Sadam had the same

attitude. Why do you think he toyed with the inspectors so often and
for so long? why do you think he challenged the USAF now and then?
Why do you think he supported terrorism??

I don't know. What about OJ and MJ? will they ever pay the price

for their crimes??

MJ hasn't been tried yet. Last I heard and saw on the TV, OJ was
found innocent by a jury of 12 who were there to observe 100% of the
facts and not what just the ones the reporters wanted their readers
and listeners to know.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

> >

#70

> You can prove your service, RIGHT. Just like your friend Dicky

can PROVE he has $700k to show me, or that he can "PROVE" there are

> hundreds of 'winning advantage players' out there right alongside
his wet dreams.

Stay on topic, Robbie. I don't know this person of which you speak.
Oh yes, I can prove my service!! Can you. Your whole scenario is so
tied up in secracy and slight of mouth that I'm not even sure that
you can tell the difference between real and fantasy.

"I can prove my service" is as nebulous as Dicky saying "I can prove
there are hundreds of 'advantage' players out there somewhere". On
the other hand, I was NOT in the service, and although I worked for
the US Gov't for 10 years when I was young (and part-time up until
last year since 9-11) my service to this country was every bit as and
likely more risky than any soldier's.

> > > You'd likely do something stupid like that because you

radiate stupidity here.

> >
> > Oh ass-clown, you know me so well? Again, clueless. I rely on
> facts, you on your own opinion presented as fact. The difference
is obvious.
>
> It's radiating again.....

The ignorance of your inability to back up one thing that you state
with a single fact is the only thing radiating around here.

Democrats don't believe in facts--only make-believe theory. That's
all you've shown. And that's why you constantly radiate stupidity.

> > His strength sure doesn't lie in his service record or his
> > accomplishments. Again Rob, some proof if it's not too much
trouble.
>
> You idiot---or maybe you just can't help it. Service proves
nothing about anyone.

A statement made by someone that has not served. To serve their
stupid idea of a false truth. Blow it out your ass, it couldn't
smell any worse.

That's a contradictory statement. One more try please.

> Oh, with one possible exception---maybe Clinton. He
> just didn't get to unload in young girls' mouths enough when he
was oung like soldiers do, so he tried to catch up in the Oval

Office.

> >
> > > The only thing that matters to me is how courageously GWB has
> > > attacked terrorism in Afg., Iraq, here with the Patriotic

Act,

> and wherever it needs to be done and whenever it needs to be done.
> >
> > Pretty much the answer I expected since all he has done is get
us
> > into an unwinnable war and give tax breaks to the wealthy.
>
> Another reason why you're still looking at him in the most
powerful
> job on earth.....and why Kerry is taking tomato ketchup baths

with

> Michael Moore.

???

> >
> > Right, taking care of the need of your own population is
> > meaningless. Improving the quality of life in Iraq is

paramount.

If
> > all that is up to me, why do I pay so many taxes?? So w can

send

> our youth overseas to die for a personal vendetta?
>
> I don't know about you (but I can probably take a good guess) but
my
> quality of life has improved drastically over the past 4 years.

Welcome to the minority on that one.

Like I care WHERE I sit on that one.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

#71

Then you should have gotten rid of it to make your response appear to
have any sense involved.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

This entire load of shit deserves no response.

#72

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

>
> Rob, you dunce, I am presenting facts, not twisted opinion.

Don't

> insult me with idle blabberings.

Duh! And those facts are supposed to have WHAT to do with anything
here? Clear the napalm fumes out and try again.

I can see why you're confused. I'm on topic here and that is
confusing to you.

>
> Every reason that was given for the war with Iraq has been
> subsequently found to be false. It's called truth, deal with it.

So say the democrats led by traiterous T. Kennedy. (Daschel got

what

was coming), and Reid's no leader. So now tell me why they lost so
much in the election?? Could it possibly be because THEY were the
ones not being truthful? Maybe just a teensy weensy bit???

No, so say the 9/11 comission, the news media and even the secretary
of defense (the real one). Everyone but Ninja Robbie.

Iraq equates to terrorism support which equates to 9-11 which

equates

to Muslim scum of the earth. GWB's dealing with it. Now all we

need

to do is clamp down on thoise terrorists hiding over here. That's

why

the Patriot Act needs a little beefing up, and anyone who has
something to hide in this country will be scanned over like a fly

on

shit.

Freedoms and rights granted by the constitution be damned. The
patriot act (funny name for fascist bullshit) has taken presidence.

>
> > Peterson thought he was smart enough never to get

caught....that

> it would all just eventually blow over. Sadam had the same
attitude. Why do you think he toyed with the inspectors so often

and

for so long? why do you think he challenged the USAF now and then?
Why do you think he supported terrorism??
>
> I don't know. What about OJ and MJ? will they ever pay the price
for their crimes??

MJ hasn't been tried yet. Last I heard and saw on the TV, OJ was
found innocent by a jury of 12 who were there to observe 100% of

the

facts and not what just the ones the reporters wanted their

readers

and listeners to know.

OJ wasn't found innocent. He was found not guilty. You can buy a
verdict with enough money but not innocence. Just like you can pay
to spin a war into good PR but if it stinks like Nam. Well, nuff
said.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

> > >

#73

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

>
> > You can prove your service, RIGHT. Just like your friend Dicky
can PROVE he has $700k to show me, or that he can "PROVE" there

are

> > hundreds of 'winning advantage players' out there right

alongside

> his wet dreams.
>
> Stay on topic, Robbie. I don't know this person of which you

speak.

> Oh yes, I can prove my service!! Can you. Your whole scenario is

so

> tied up in secracy and slight of mouth that I'm not even sure

that

> you can tell the difference between real and fantasy.

"I can prove my service" is as nebulous as Dicky saying "I can

prove

there are hundreds of 'advantage' players out there somewhere". On
the other hand, I was NOT in the service, and although I worked

for

the US Gov't for 10 years when I was young (and part-time up until
last year since 9-11) my service to this country was every bit as

and

likely more risky than any soldier's.

What in the hell does VP have to do with this stupid war that you
are so proud of?? You've been spending too mach time with your buddy
Rush Limbaugh and his medicine cabinet. Or maybe it's your good
friend G. Gordon who must be your source for truth. Maybe Ollie
North? It was OK cause it was a bad law. You badmouth democrats but
look at what your party has produced. Clinton got blown, so what.
Bush is screwing America and you are there holding the Vaseline. If
this were 230 years ago and you, with your hero worship of the
ruling party, you would be piss-boy for king George IIII.

>
> The ignorance of your inability to back up one thing that you

state

> with a single fact is the only thing radiating around here.

Democrats don't believe in facts--only make-believe theory. That's
all you've shown. And that's why you constantly radiate stupidity.

I believe in facts and have done all I could to back up my
statements made in this thread. You, on the other hand, have used
insult and innuendo to make your case. Poor politics. Non-factual.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

>
> > >
> > > Right, taking care of the need of your own population is
> > > meaningless. Improving the quality of life in Iraq is
paramount.
> If
> > > all that is up to me, why do I pay so many taxes?? So w can
send
> > our youth overseas to die for a personal vendetta?
> >

#74

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

>
> This entire load of shit deserves no response.

Then you should have gotten rid of it to make your response appear

to

have any sense involved.

Anyone who reads your constant regurgatation of the same myths and
mistruths knows, absolutely, that you are full of shit and full of
yourself. Same thing...could be.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

#75

> Duh! And those facts are supposed to have WHAT to do with

anything

> here? Clear the napalm fumes out and try again.

I can see why you're confused. I'm on topic here and that is
confusing to you.

Now THERE's something that makes a lot of sense and really clears
things up. I guess that's what anti-war protesting with napalm on the
brain can do.

> > Every reason that was given for the war with Iraq has been
> > subsequently found to be false. It's called truth, deal with it.
>
> So say the democrats led by traiterous T. Kennedy. (Daschel got
what was coming), and Reid's no leader. So now tell me why they

lost so much in the election?? Could it possibly be because THEY were
the ones not being truthful? Maybe just a teensy weensy bit???

No, so say the 9/11 comission, the news media and even the

secretary of defense (the real one). Everyone but Ninja Robbie.

And one more very important person on this earth: President Bush! And
that's all it takes to sit a peacenik like you down for the count.

Freedoms and rights granted by the constitution be damned. The
patriot act (funny name for fascist bullshit) has taken presidence.

Only those with something to hide are against such an act. To those
toads I say TS. It was enacted to protect even cowards like you.

> MJ hasn't been tried yet. Last I heard and saw on the TV, OJ was
> found innocent by a jury of 12 who were there to observe 100% of
the facts and not what just the ones the reporters wanted their
readers and listeners to know.

OJ wasn't found innocent. He was found not guilty.

Another twisted "fact" Johnny boy?? All you do is complain about
everything American, and for that you deserve to miss your brother
after protesting everything he died for.

You can buy a

verdict with enough money but not innocence. Just like you can pay
to spin a war into good PR but if it stinks like Nam. Well, nuff
said.

Waa Waa Waaaaaa.....That famous democratic baby is whining again.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

#76

> "I can prove my service" is as nebulous as Dicky saying "I can
prove there are hundreds of 'advantage' players out there

somewhere". On the other hand, I was NOT in the service, and although
I worked for the US Gov't for 10 years when I was young (and part-
time up until last year since 9-11) my service to this country was
every bit as and likely more risky than any soldier's.

What in the hell does VP have to do with this stupid war that you
are so proud of?? You've been spending too mach time with your

buddy Rush Limbaugh and his medicine cabinet.

I don't like or listen to Rush Limbaugh. But I do listen to Michael
Savage once a month or so. Don't have all that much time. Everybody's
always listening to me!

Or maybe it's your good

friend G. Gordon who must be your source for truth. Maybe Ollie
North? It was OK cause it was a bad law. You badmouth democrats but
look at what your party has produced. Clinton got blown, so what.
Bush is screwing America and you are there holding the Vaseline. If
this were 230 years ago and you, with your hero worship of the
ruling party, you would be piss-boy for king George IIII.

I never listen to any of these guys. Clinton mocked the oval office
and position of president of the US. Other than that, who wouldn't
take a header from a 22 yr. old girl?

> > The ignorance of your inability to back up one thing that you
state with a single fact is the only thing radiating around here.
>
> Democrats don't believe in facts--only make-believe theory.

That's all you've shown. And that's why you constantly radiate
stupidity.

I believe in facts and have done all I could to back up my
statements made in this thread. You, on the other hand, have used
insult and innuendo to make your case. Poor politics. Non-factual.

All you do is drag other opinions in from the Internet. Like Dicky,
you have zero originality, less-than-zero credibility, and a whole
lot of rage.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

#77

> > This entire load of shit deserves no response.
>
> Then you should have gotten rid of it to make your response

appear to have any sense involved.

Anyone who reads your constant regurgatation of the same myths and
mistruths knows, absolutely, that you are full of shit and full of
yourself. Same thing...could be.

Doesn't change the 'fact' (ever hear of that word or know what it
entails??) that you lead a sour life and blame all your misfortunes
on GWB. To that I scratch my butt once and laugh a thousand times.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...> wrote:

#78

Robbie, if you have nothing clever to say, just go back and have
another oxy with your good buddy Rush.

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

>
> > Duh! And those facts are supposed to have WHAT to do with
anything
> > here? Clear the napalm fumes out and try again.
>
> I can see why you're confused. I'm on topic here and that is
> confusing to you.

Now THERE's something that makes a lot of sense and really clears
things up. I guess that's what anti-war protesting with napalm on

the

brain can do.
>
> > > Every reason that was given for the war with Iraq has been
> > > subsequently found to be false. It's called truth, deal with

it.

> >
> > So say the democrats led by traiterous T. Kennedy. (Daschel

got

> what was coming), and Reid's no leader. So now tell me why they
lost so much in the election?? Could it possibly be because THEY

were

the ones not being truthful? Maybe just a teensy weensy bit???
>
> No, so say the 9/11 comission, the news media and even the
secretary of defense (the real one). Everyone but Ninja Robbie.

And one more very important person on this earth: President Bush!

And

that's all it takes to sit a peacenik like you down for the count.
>
> Freedoms and rights granted by the constitution be damned. The
> patriot act (funny name for fascist bullshit) has taken

presidence.

Only those with something to hide are against such an act. To

those

toads I say TS. It was enacted to protect even cowards like you.
>
> > MJ hasn't been tried yet. Last I heard and saw on the TV, OJ

was

> > found innocent by a jury of 12 who were there to observe 100%

of

> the facts and not what just the ones the reporters wanted their
> readers and listeners to know.
>
> OJ wasn't found innocent. He was found not guilty.

Another twisted "fact" Johnny boy?? All you do is complain about
everything American, and for that you deserve to miss your brother
after protesting everything he died for.

You can buy a
> verdict with enough money but not innocence. Just like you can

pay

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

> to spin a war into good PR but if it stinks like Nam. Well, nuff
> said.

Waa Waa Waaaaaa.....That famous democratic baby is whining again.

#79

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

>
> > "I can prove my service" is as nebulous as Dicky saying "I can
> prove there are hundreds of 'advantage' players out there
somewhere". On the other hand, I was NOT in the service, and

although

I worked for the US Gov't for 10 years when I was young (and part-
time up until last year since 9-11) my service to this country was
every bit as and likely more risky than any soldier's.
>
> What in the hell does VP have to do with this stupid war that

you

> are so proud of?? You've been spending too mach time with your
buddy Rush Limbaugh and his medicine cabinet.

I don't like or listen to Rush Limbaugh.

C'mon Robbie-boy, you and Rush go way back. You both like the same
drugs and have the same opinions. You and he are pretty much
intrrchangeable.

But I do listen to Michael

Savage once a month or so. Don't have all that much time.

Everybody's

always listening to me!

Or maybe it's your good
> friend G. Gordon who must be your source for truth. Maybe Ollie
> North? It was OK cause it was a bad law. You badmouth democrats

but

> look at what your party has produced. Clinton got blown, so

what.

> Bush is screwing America and you are there holding the Vaseline.

If

> this were 230 years ago and you, with your hero worship of the
> ruling party, you would be piss-boy for king George IIII.

I never listen to any of these guys. Clinton mocked the oval

office

and position of president of the US. Other than that, who wouldn't
take a header from a 22 yr. old girl?

I heard G. Gordon tell you how republican presidents get oral too.
So don't be coy.

>
> > > The ignorance of your inability to back up one thing that

you

> state with a single fact is the only thing radiating around here.
> >
> > Democrats don't believe in facts--only make-believe theory.
That's all you've shown. And that's why you constantly radiate
stupidity.
>
> I believe in facts and have done all I could to back up my
> statements made in this thread. You, on the other hand, have

used

> insult and innuendo to make your case. Poor politics. Non-

factual.

All you do is drag other opinions in from the Internet. Like

Dicky,

you have zero originality, less-than-zero credibility, and a whole
lot of rage.

Tell Ollie all about it over drinks at the pub tonight. You guys are
great on karoke night. Are you Sonny or Cher??

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote:

#80

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "John" <three2theroyal@y...>

wrote:

>
> > > This entire load of shit deserves no response.
> >
> > Then you should have gotten rid of it to make your response
appear to have any sense involved.
>
> Anyone who reads your constant regurgatation of the same myths

and

> mistruths knows, absolutely, that you are full of shit and full

of

> yourself. Same thing...could be.

Doesn't change the 'fact' (ever hear of that word or know what it
entails??) that you lead a sour life and blame all your

misfortunes

on GWB. To that I scratch my butt once and laugh a thousand times.

C'mon Rob. You scratch and sniff. And there is no fact listed above,
just the fact that you have no point and back it up with opinion.

···

--- In FREEvpFREE@yahoogroups.com, "deadin7" <deadin7@y...> wrote: